André Pacheco

Dr. André Pacheco

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2015 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
APAndré Pacheco
André Pacheco
JHJ. Horta
J. Horta
CLCarlos Loureiro
Carlos Loureiro
ÓFÓ. Ferreira
Ó. Ferreira


1 August 2010 in Marine Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAndré Pacheco
André Pacheco
ÓFÓ. Ferreira
Ó. Ferreira
JWJ.J. Williams
J.J. Williams
EGE. Garel
E. Garel
AVAna Vila-Concejo
Ana Vila-Concejo
JDJ.A. Dias
J.A. Dias

1 May 2019 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CSclaudia sequeira
claudia sequeira
APAndré Pacheco
André Pacheco
PGP. Galego
P. Galego
EEEduardo González-gorbeña Eisenmann
Eduardo González-gorbeña Eisenmann

4 May 2016 in Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ÓFÓscar Ferreira
Óscar Ferreira
AMAna Matias
Ana Matias
APAndré Pacheco
André Pacheco

20 September 2010 in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALuis Pedro Melo de Almeida
Luis Pedro Melo de Almeida
ÓFÓ. Ferreira
Ó. Ferreira
APAndré Pacheco
André Pacheco
A sandy beach in the south of Portugal (Faro beach, Ria Formosa) was surveyed from the dune crest seaward to 15 m depth 20 times over a period of 26 months. Wave time‐series between surveys were analysed to obtain relationships between wave height and vertical profile variations and to define wave thresholds for important morphological changes. Results show that the active zone of the profile lies between 5 m above and 10·4 m below mean sea level, and that there are clear cross‐shore differences in the vertical variability of the profile. Based on the pattern of vertical variability, the profile was divided into four cross‐shore sectors: A (berm), 20–80 m from the profile origin; B (sub‐tidal terrace), 80–170 m; C (long‐shore bar), 170–360 m; and D, 360–700 m. The relationship between the modulus of the maximum vertical change in each sector and the 99th percentile of significant wave height between surveys was always significant. Calculated thresholds for significant wave height generating important morphological changes were 2·3 m in sector A, 3·2 m in sectors B and C, and 4·1 m in sector D. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.