This meta-analysis sought to evaluate the potential benefits and harms of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer versus open surgery. A comprehensive search for randomized controlled studies that compared laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer published until December 31, 2018, was conducted. Operative outcomes, early postoperative outcomes, and long-term results were analyzed using a random effects model. Five randomized controlled trials containing a collective total of 2157 patients were included. In comparison with open surgery, laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer showed similar risks of short-term mortality and serious adverse events within 30 days after surgery. Regarding intraoperative outcomes, operative time was increased for the laparoscopic approach, whereas the estimated intraoperative blood loss tended to be less. However, the amount of evidence was low for most outcomes. In addition, the results for the length of hospital stay and time to first flatus did not show statistically significant differences. The number of harvested lymph nodes and compliance with D2 lymphadenectomy did not significantly differ between the two groups, indicating oncological equivalence of both approaches. However, long-term oncological results could not be evaluated due to a lack of relevant data in four of the trials. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy can be performed with equivalent overall short-term morbidity and mortality versus the open approach for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are necessary to assess the possible advantages and risks of the laparoscopic approach as well as the long-term results.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of the TNF superfamily. TRAIL has historically been distinct from the Fas ligand and TNFα in terms of selective apoptosis induction in tumor cells and has a nearly non-existent systemic toxicity. Consequently, in the search for an ideal drug for tumor therapy, TRAIL rapidly drew interest, promising effective tumor control with minimal side effects. However, euphoria gave way to disillusionment as it turned out that carcinoma cells possess or can acquire resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Additionally, studies on models of inflammation and autoimmunity revealed that TRAIL can influence immune cells in many different ways. While TRAIL was initially found to be an important player in tumor defense by natural killer cells or cytotoxic T cells, additional effects of TRAIL on regulatory T cells and effector T cells, as well as on neutrophilic granulocytes and antigen-presenting cells, became focuses of interest. The tumor-promoting effects of these interactions become particularly important for consideration in cases where tumors are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Consequently, murine models have shown that TRAIL can impair the tumor microenvironment toward a more immunosuppressive type, thereby promoting tumor growth. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on TRAIL’s interactions with the immune system in the context of cancer.

Cholinergic signaling via the muscarinic M3 acetylcholine receptor (M3R) is involved in the development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study aimed to analyze the blocking of M3R signaling in CRC using darifenacin, a selective M3R antagonist. Darifenacin effects were studied on HT-29 and SW480 CRC cells using MTT and BrdU assays, Western blotting and real time RT-PCR. In vivo, blocking of M3R was assessed in an orthotopic CRC xenograft BALB/c^nu/nu mouse model. M3R expression in clinical tumor specimens was studied by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray of 585 CRC patients. In vitro, darifenacin decreased tumor cell survival and proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Acetylcholine-induced p38, ERK1/2 and Akt signaling, and MMP-1 mRNA expression were decreased by darifenacin, as well as matrigel invasion of tumor cells. In mice, darifenacin reduced primary tumor volume and weight (p < 0.05), as well as liver metastases, compared to controls. High expression scores of M3R were found on 89.2% of clinical CRC samples and correlated with infiltrative tumor border and non-mucinous histology (p < 0.05). In conclusion, darifenacin inhibited components of tumor growth and progression in vitro and reduced tumor growth in vivo. Its target, M3R, was expressed on the majority of CRC. Thus, repurposing darifenacin may be an attractive addition to systemic tumor therapy in CRC patients expressing M3R.

Background: Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery is gaining popularity, but limited data are available on the safety, efficacy, and cost of robotic-assisted restorative proctectomy with the construction of an ileal pouch and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted comparing consecutively performed robotic-assisted and laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA between 1 January 2016 and 31 September 2021. In total, 67 adult patients with medically refractory UC without proven dysplasia or carcinoma underwent surgery: 29 operated robotically and 38 laparoscopically. Results: There were no differences between both groups regarding postoperative complications within 30 days according to Clavien-Dindo classification’ grades 1–5 (51.7% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.468) and severe grades 3b–5 (17.2% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.485). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with an increased urinary tract infection rate (n = 7, 24.1% vs. n = 1, 2.6%; p = 0.010) and longer operative time (346 ± 65 min vs. 281 ± 66 min; p < 0.0001). Surgery costs were higher when operated robotically (median EUR 10.377 [IQR EUR 4.727] vs. median EUR 6.689 [IQR EUR 3.170]; p < 0.0001), resulting in reduced total inpatient profits (median EUR 110 [IQR EUR 4.971] vs. median EUR 2.853 [IQR EUR 5.386]; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Robotic-assisted proctectomy with IPAA can be performed with comparable short-term clinical outcomes to laparoscopy but is associated with a longer duration of surgery and higher surgery costs. As experience increases, some advantages may become evident regarding operative time, postoperative recovery, and length of stay. The robotic procedure might then become cost-efficient.

Opinion statement: The surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma has progressed significantly in the past few decades. A major milestone was the establishment of multimodal therapies for locally advanced tumours. Improvements in the technique of endoscopic resection have supplanted surgery in the early stages of many cases of gastric cancer. In cases in which an endoscopic resection is not possible, surgical limited resection procedures for the early stages of carcinoma are an equal alternative to gastrectomy in the field of oncology. Proximal gastrectomy is extensively discussed in this context. Whether proximal gastrectomy leads to a better quality of life and better nutritional well-being than total gastrectomy depends on the reconstruction chosen. The outcome cannot be conclusively assessed at present. For locally advanced stages, total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is now the global standard. A subtotal gastrectomy requires sufficiently long tumour-free proximal resection margins. Recent data indicate that proximal margins of at least 3 cm for tumours with an expansive growth pattern and at least 5 cm for those with an infiltrative growth pattern are sufficient. The most frequently performed reconstruction worldwide following gastrectomy is the Roux-en-Y reconstruction. However, there is evidence that pouch reconstruction is superior in terms of quality of life and nutritional well-being. Oncological gastric surgery is increasingly being performed laparoscopically. The safety and oncological equivalency were first demonstrated for early carcinomas and then for locally advanced tumours, by cohort studies and RCTs. Some studies suggest that laparoscopic procedures may be advantageous in early postoperative recovery. Robotic gastrectomy is also increasing in use. Preliminary results suggest that robotic gastrectomy may have added value in lymphadenectomy and in the early postoperative course. However, further studies are needed to substantiate these results. There is an ongoing debate about the best treatment option for gastric cancer with oligometastatic disease. Preliminary results indicate that certain patient groups could benefit from resection of the primary tumour and metastases following chemotherapy. However, the exact conditions in which patients may benefit have yet to be confirmed by ongoing trials.

Interleukine-6 plays a key role in the progression and poor survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The present study aimed to clarify if targeting the interleukin-6/glycoprotein-130 signaling cascade using the small-molecule gp130 inhibitor SC144 or raloxifene, a non-steroidal selective estrogen receptor modulator, enhances paclitaxel efficacy. MTT/BrdU assays or TUNEL staining were performed to investigate cell viability, proliferation and apoptosis induction in L3.6pl and AsPC-1 human pancreatic cell lines. In vivo, effects were studied in an orthotopic PDAC mouse model. Tumor specimens were analyzed by qPCR, immunohistochemistry and ELISA. Combination of paclitaxel/raloxifene, but not paclitaxel/SC144, enhanced proliferation and viability inhibition and increased apoptosis compared to single treatment in vitro. Synergy score calculations confirmed an additive influence of raloxifene on paclitaxel. In the PDAC mouse model, both combinations of raloxifene/paclitaxel and SC144/paclitaxel reduced tumor weight and volume compared to single-agent therapy or control. Raloxifene/paclitaxel treatment decreased survivin mRNA expression and showed tendencies of increased caspase-3 staining in primary tumors. SC144/paclitaxel reduced interleukin-6 levels in mice’s tumors and plasma. In conclusion, raloxifene or SC144 can enhance the anti-tumorigenic effects of paclitaxel, suggesting that paclitaxel doses might also be reduced in combined chemotherapy to lessen paclitaxel side effects.