Alex Thomsen

Dr. Alex Thomsen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2016 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAlex Thomsen
Alex Thomsen
BPBianca Plouffe
Bianca Plouffe
TCThomas J. Cahill
Thomas J. Cahill
ASArun K. Shukla
Arun K. Shukla
JTJeffrey T. Tarrasch
Jeffrey T. Tarrasch
RLRobert J. Lefkowitz
Robert J. Lefkowitz

21 February 2017 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCThomas J. Cahill
Thomas J. Cahill
ATAlex Thomsen
Alex Thomsen
JTJeffrey T. Tarrasch
Jeffrey T. Tarrasch
BPBianca Plouffe
Bianca Plouffe
ANAnthony H. Nguyen
Anthony H. Nguyen
RLRobert J. Lefkowitz
Robert J. Lefkowitz
Significance: β-Arrestins (βarrs) interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to desensitize G protein signaling, initiate signaling on their own, and mediate receptor endocytosis. Using a panel of GPCRs believed to couple differently to βarrs, we demonstrate how distinct conformations of GPCR–βarr complexes are specialized to perform different subsets of these cellular functions. Our results thus provide a new signaling paradigm for the understanding of GPCRs, whereby a specific GPCR–βarr conformation mediates receptor desensitization, and another drives internalization and some forms of signaling.

1 April 2014 in Current Opinion in Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJames W Wisler
James W Wisler
KXKunhong Xiao
Kunhong Xiao
ATAlex Thomsen
Alex Thomsen
RLRobert J Lefkowitz
Robert J Lefkowitz

18 November 2019 in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANAnthony H. Nguyen
Anthony H. Nguyen
ATAlex Thomsen
Alex Thomsen
TCThomas J. Cahill
Thomas J. Cahill
RHRick Huang
Rick Huang
LHLi-Yin Huang
Li-Yin Huang
RLRobert J. Lefkowitz
Robert J. Lefkowitz

1 May 2014 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRyan T. Strachan
Ryan T. Strachan
JSJin-Peng Sun
Jin-Peng Sun
DRDavid H. Rominger
David H. Rominger
JVJonathan D. Violin
Jonathan D. Violin
SASeungkirl Ahn
Seungkirl Ahn
RLRobert J. Lefkowitz
Robert J. Lefkowitz
The concept of "biased agonism" arises from the recognition that the ability of an agonist to induce a receptor-mediated response (i.e. "efficacy") can differ across the multiple signal transduction pathways (e.g. G protein and β-arrestin (βarr)) emanating from a single GPCR. Despite the therapeutic promise of biased agonism, the molecular mechanism(s) whereby biased agonists selectively engage signaling pathways remain elusive. This is due in large part to the challenges associated with quantifying ligand efficacy in cells. To address this, we developed a cell-free approach to directly quantify the transducer-specific molecular efficacies of balanced and biased ligands for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), a prototypic GPCR. Specifically, we defined efficacy in allosteric terms, equating shifts in ligand affinity (i.e. KLo/KHi) at AT1R-Gq and AT1R-βarr2 fusion proteins with their respective molecular efficacies for activating Gq and βarr2. Consistent with ternary complex model predictions, transducer-specific molecular efficacies were strongly correlated with cellular efficacies for activating Gq and βarr2. Subsequent comparisons across transducers revealed that biased AT1R agonists possess biased molecular efficacies that were in strong agreement with the signaling bias observed in cellular assays. These findings not only represent the first measurements of the thermodynamic driving forces underlying differences in ligand efficacy between transducers but also support a molecular mechanism whereby divergent transducer-specific molecular efficacies generate biased agonism at a GPCR.

25 November 2008 in Human Mutation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PAPaal Skytt Andersen
Paal Skytt Andersen
OHOle Havndrup
Ole Havndrup
LHLotte Hougs
Lotte Hougs
KSKarina M. Sørensen
Karina M. Sørensen
MJMorten Jensen
Morten Jensen
HBHenning Bundgaard
Henning Bundgaard
The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends family screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We assessed the outcome of family screening combining clinical evaluation and screening for sarcomere gene mutations in a cohort of 90 Danish HCM patients and their close relatives, in all 451 persons. Index patients were screened for mutations in all coding regions of 10 sarcomere genes (MYH7, MYL3, MYBPC3, TNNI3, TNNT2, TPM1, ACTC, CSRP3, TCAP, and TNNC1) and five exons of TTN. Relatives were screened for presence of minor or major diagnostic criteria for HCM and tracking of DNA variants was performed. In total, 297 adult relatives (>18 years) (51.2%) fulfilled one or more criteria for HCM. A total of 38 HCM‐causing mutations were detected in 32 index patients. Six patients carried two disease‐associated mutations. Twenty‐two mutations have only been identified in the present cohort. The genetic diagnostic yield was almost twice as high in familial HCM (53%) vs. HCM of sporadic or unclear inheritance (19%). The yield was highest in families with an additional history of HCM‐related clinical events. In relatives, 29.9% of mutation carriers did not fulfil any clinical diagnostic criterion, and in 37.5% of relatives without a mutation, one or more criteria was fulfilled. A total of 60% of family members had no mutation and could be reassured and further follow‐up ceased. Genetic diagnosis may be established in approximately 40% of families with the highest yield in familial HCM with clinical events. Mutation‐screening was superior to clinical investigation in identification of individuals not at increased risk, where follow‐up is redundant, but should be offered in all families with relatives at risk for developing HCM. Hum Mutat 0,1–8, 2008.