Mario Schubert

Dr. Mario Schubert

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2002 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFederica Castellani
Federica Castellani
BRBarth van Rossum
Barth van Rossum
ADAnnette Diehl
Annette Diehl
MSMario Schubert
Mario Schubert
KRKristina Rehbein
Kristina Rehbein
HOHartmut Oschkinat
Hartmut Oschkinat

7 December 2007 in Molecular Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKarine Lapouge
Karine Lapouge
MSMario Schubert
Mario Schubert
FAFrédéric H.‐T. Allain
Frédéric H.‐T. Allain
DHDieter Haas
Dieter Haas
Summary: In many γ‐proteobacteria, the conserved GacS/GacA (BarA/UvrY) two‐component system positively controls the expression of one to five genes specifying small RNAs (sRNAs) that are characterized by repeated unpaired GGA motifs but otherwise appear to belong to several independent families. The GGA motifs are essential for binding small, dimeric RNA‐binding proteins of a single conserved family designated RsmA (CsrA). These proteins, which also occur in bacterial species outside the γ‐proteobacteria, act as translational repressors of certain mRNAs when these contain an RsmA/CsrA binding site at or near the Shine‐Dalgarno sequence plus additional binding sites located in the 5′ untranslated leader mRNA. Recent structural data have established that the RsmA‐like protein RsmE of Pseudomonas fluorescens makes specific contacts with an RNA consensus sequence 5′‐A/UCANGGANGU/A‐3′ (where N is any nucleotide). Interaction with an RsmA/CsrA protein promotes the formation of a short stem supporting an ANGGAN loop. This conformation hinders access of 30S ribosomal subunits and hence translation initiation. The output of the Gac/Rsm cascade varies widely in different bacterial species and typically involves management of carbon storage and expression of virulence or biocontrol factors. Unidentified signal molecules co‐ordinate the activity of the Gac/Rsm cascade in a cell population density‐dependent manner.

1 October 2002 in Journal of Biomolecular NMR
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMario Schubert
Mario Schubert
DLDirk Labudde
Dirk Labudde
HOHartmut Oschkinat
Hartmut Oschkinat
PSPeter Schmieder
Peter Schmieder

14 May 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ODOlivier Duss
Olivier Duss
EMErich Michel
Erich Michel
MYMaxim Yulikov
Maxim Yulikov
MSMario Schubert
Mario Schubert
GJGunnar Jeschke
Gunnar Jeschke
FAFrédéric H.-T. Allain
Frédéric H.-T. Allain
MicroRNA and protein sequestration by non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) has recently generated much interest. In the bacterial Csr/Rsm system, which is considered to be the most general global post-transcriptional regulatory system responsible for bacterial virulence, ncRNAs such as CsrB or RsmZ activate translation initiation by sequestering homodimeric CsrA-type proteins from the ribosome-binding site of a subset of messenger RNAs. However, the mechanism of ncRNA-mediated protein sequestration is not understood at the molecular level. Here we show for Pseudomonas fluorescens that RsmE protein dimers assemble sequentially, specifically and cooperatively onto the ncRNA RsmZ within a narrow affinity range. This assembly yields two different native ribonucleoprotein structures. Using a powerful combination of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy we elucidate these 70-kilodalton solution structures, thereby revealing the molecular mechanism of the sequestration process and how RsmE binding protects the ncRNA from RNase E degradation. Overall, our findings suggest that RsmZ is well-tuned to sequester, store and release RsmE and therefore can be viewed as an ideal protein ‘sponge’.

19 August 2007 in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMario Schubert
Mario Schubert
KLKarine Lapouge
Karine Lapouge
ODOlivier Duss
Olivier Duss
FOFlorian C Oberstrass
Florian C Oberstrass
IJIlian Jelesarov
Ilian Jelesarov
FAFrédéric H-T Allain
Frédéric H-T Allain

1 November 2011 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDiana Santelia
Diana Santelia
OKOliver Kötting
Oliver Kötting
DSDavid Seung
David Seung
MSMario Schubert
Mario Schubert
MTMatthias Thalmann
Matthias Thalmann
SZSamuel C. Zeeman
Samuel C. Zeeman
Starch contains phosphate covalently bound to the C6-position (70 to 80% of total bound phosphate) and the C3-position (20 to 30%) of the glucosyl residues of the amylopectin fraction. In plants, the transient phosphorylation of starch renders the granule surface more accessible to glucan hydrolyzing enzymes and is required for proper starch degradation. Phosphate also confers desired properties to starch-derived pastes for industrial applications. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the removal of phosphate by the glucan phosphatase Starch Excess4 (SEX4) is essential for starch breakdown. We identified a homolog of SEX4, LSF2 (Like Sex Four2), as a novel enzyme involved in starch metabolism in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Unlike SEX4, LSF2 does not have a carbohydrate binding module. Nevertheless, it binds to starch and specifically hydrolyzes phosphate from the C3-position. As a consequence, lsf2 mutant starch has elevated levels of C3-bound phosphate. SEX4 can release phosphate from both the C6- and the C3-positions, resulting in partial functional overlap with LSF2. However, compared with sex4 single mutants, the lsf2 sex4 double mutants have a more severe starch-excess phenotype, impaired growth, and a further change in the proportion of C3- and C6-bound phosphate. These findings significantly advance our understanding of the metabolism of phosphate in starch and provide innovative options for tailoring novel starches with improved functionality for industry.