Ulf Betke

Dr. Ulf Betke

Institute for Materials and Joining Technology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2017 in Advanced Engineering Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Tobias FeyTobias Fey
Tobias Fey
Ulf BetkeUlf Betke
Ulf Betke
SRStefan Rannabauer
Stefan Rannabauer
Michael SchefflerMichael Scheffler
Michael Scheffler

4 June 2018 in Advanced Engineering Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ulf BetkeUlf Betke
Ulf Betke
ALAlexandra Lieb
Alexandra Lieb


29 March 2019 in Advanced Engineering Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKatja Schelm
Katja Schelm
TFTobias Fey
Tobias Fey
KDKathleen Dammler
Kathleen Dammler
Ulf BetkeUlf Betke
Ulf Betke
MSMichael Scheffler
Michael Scheffler

9 June 2017 in Advanced Engineering Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SRStefan Rannabauer
Stefan Rannabauer
GSGerrit‐Maximilian Söffker
Gerrit‐Maximilian Söffker
MSMarcel Scheunemann
Marcel Scheunemann
Ulf BetkeUlf Betke
Ulf Betke
MSMichael Scheffler
Michael Scheffler

21 November 2019 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlina Sutygina
Alina Sutygina
Ulf BetkeUlf Betke
Ulf Betke
Michael SchefflerMichael Scheffler
Michael Scheffler
Open-cell aluminum foams were manufactured by a sponge replication technique having a total porosity of ~90%. The influence of the thermal processing conditions such as atmosphere and temperature on the cellular structure, phase composition porosity, thermal conductivity, and compressive strength of the foams was studied. It was found that the thermal processing of aluminum foams in Ar at temperatures up to 800 °C led to aluminum foams with a reduced strut porosity, a lower amount of aluminum oxide, a higher thermal conductivity, and a higher compression strength, compared to foams thermally processed in air. These results were explained by the lower amount of aluminum oxide after thermal processing of the foams.