Andrew Neilson

Dr. Andrew Neilson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2020 in GeroScience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VBVienna E. Brunt
Vienna E. Brunt
TLThomas J LaRocca
Thomas J LaRocca
ABAmy E. Bazzoni
Amy E. Bazzoni
ZSZachary J. Sapinsley
Zachary J. Sapinsley
JMJill Miyamoto-Ditmon
Jill Miyamoto-Ditmon
DSDouglas R. Seals
Douglas R. Seals

11 December 2019 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QJQing Jin
Qing Jin
JOJoshua OHair
Joshua OHair
ASAmanda Stewart
Amanda Stewart
Sean O'KeefeSean O'Keefe
Sean O'Keefe
ANAndrew Neilson
Andrew Neilson
HAIBO HUANGHAIBO HUANG
HAIBO HUANG
To better evaluate potential uses for grape pomace (GP) waste, a comprehensive chemical composition analysis of GP in Virginia was conducted. Eight commercial white and red pomace samples (cv. Viognier, Vidal Blanc, Niagara, Petit Manseng, Petit Verdot, Merlot, Cabernet Franc, and Chambourcin) obtained from different wineries in Virginia, USA were used. For extractives, GPs contained 2.89%–4.66% titratable acids, 4.32%–6.60% ash, 4.62%–12.5% lipids with linoleic acid being the predominant (59.0%–70.9%) fatty acid, 10.4–64.8 g total phenolic content (gallic acid equivalents)/kg GP, 2.09–53.3 g glucose/kg GP, 3.79–52.9 g fructose/kg GP, and trace sucrose. As for non-extractives, GPs contained 25.2%–44.5% lignin, 8.04%–12.7% glucan, 4.42%–7.05% xylan, and trace amounts of galactan, arabinan, and mannan (less than 3% in total). Potential usages of these components were further examined to provide information on better valorization of GP. Considering the valuable extractives (e.g., polyphenols and oil) and non-extractives (e.g., lignin), designing a biorefinery process aiming at fully recover and/or utilize these components is of future significance.

1 August 2015 in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZBZachary T. Bitzer
Zachary T. Bitzer
SGShannon L. Glisan
Shannon L. Glisan
MDMelanie R. Dorenkott
Melanie R. Dorenkott
KGKatheryn M. Goodrich
Katheryn M. Goodrich
LYLiyun Ye
Liyun Ye
ANAndrew Neilson
Andrew Neilson

1 October 2015 in Nutrition Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNabil Boutagy
Nabil Boutagy
ANAndrew Neilson
Andrew Neilson
KOKristin L. Osterberg
Kristin L. Osterberg
ASAndrew T. Smithson
Andrew T. Smithson
TETessa Englund
Tessa Englund
KDKevin Davy
Kevin Davy

1 September 2016 in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKaren M. Strat
Karen M. Strat
TRThomas J. Rowley
Thomas J. Rowley
ASAndrew T. Smithson
Andrew T. Smithson
Jeffery TessemJeffery Tessem
Jeffery Tessem
MHMatthew W. Hulver
Matthew W. Hulver
ANAndrew Neilson
Andrew Neilson

28 February 2016 in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ANAndrew Neilson
Andrew Neilson
Sean O'KeefeSean O'Keefe
Sean O'Keefe
BBBradley W Bolling
Bradley W Bolling
Proanthocyanidins (PACs) are an abundant but complex class of polyphenols found in foods and botanicals. PACs are polymeric flavanols with a variety of linkages and subunits. Connectivity and degree of polymerization (DP) determine PAC bioavailability and bioactivity. Current quantitative and qualitative methods may ignore a large percentage of dietary PACs. Subsequent correlations between intake and activity are hindered by a lack of understanding of the true PAC complexity in many foods. Additionally, estimates of dietary intakes are likely inaccurate, as nutrient databank values are largely based on standards from cocoa (monomers to decamers) and blueberries (mean DP of 36). Improved analytical methodologies are needed to increase our understanding of the biological roles of these complex compounds.