Jonathan Stephan

Dr. Jonathan Stephan

Institute of Neurobiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, D 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2008 in Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKarl Wolfgang Kafitz
Karl Wolfgang Kafitz
SMSilke Doris Meier
Silke Doris Meier
JSJonathan Stephan
Jonathan Stephan
CRChristine Rosemarie Rose
Christine Rosemarie Rose

24 October 2011 in Glia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJulia Langer
Julia Langer
JSJonathan Stephan
Jonathan Stephan
MTMartin Theis
Martin Theis
Christine R. RoseChristine R. Rose
Christine R. Rose

27 April 2017 in The Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSandra Schilling
Sandra Schilling
AMAnnika Mehr
Annika Mehr
SLSusann Ludewig
Susann Ludewig
JSJonathan Stephan
Jonathan Stephan
MZMarius Zimmermann
Marius Zimmermann
SESimone Eggert
Simone Eggert
The amyloid precursor protein (APP), a key player in Alzheimer's disease, belongs to the family of synaptic adhesion molecules (SAMs) due to its impact on synapse formation and synaptic plasticity. These functions are mediated by both the secreted APP ectodomain that acts as a neurotrophic factor and full-length APP formingtrans-cellular dimers. Two homologs of APP exist in mammals: the APP like proteins APLP1 and APLP2, exhibiting functions that partly overlap with those of APP. Here we tested whether APLP1 and APLP2 also show features of SAMs. We found that all three family members were upregulated during postnatal development coinciding with synaptogenesis. We observed presynaptic and postsynaptic localization of all APP family members and could show that heterologous expression of APLP1 or APLP2 in non-neuronal cells induces presynaptic differentiation in contacting axons of cocultured neurons, similar to APP and other SAMs. Moreover, APP/APLPs all bind to synaptic-signaling molecules, such as MINT/X11. Furthermore, we report that aged APLP1 knock-out mice show impaired basal transmission and a reduced mEPSC frequency, likely resulting from reduced spine density. This demonstrates an essential nonredundant function of APLP1 at the synapse. Compared to APP, APLP1 exhibits increasedtrans-cellular binding and elevated cell-surface levels due to reduced endocytosis. In conclusion, our results establish that APLPs show typical features of SAMs and indicate that increased surface expression, as observed for APLP1, is essential for proper synapse formationin vitroand synapse maintenancein vivo.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTAccording to the amyloid-cascade hypothesis, Alzheimer's disease is caused by the accumulation of Aβ peptides derived from sequential cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) and γ-secretase. Here we show that all mammalian APP family members (APP, APLP1, and APLP2) exhibit synaptogenic activity, involvingtrans-synaptic dimerization, similar to other synaptic cell adhesion molecules, such as Neuroligin/Neurexin. Importantly, our study revealed that the loss of APLP1, which is one of the major substrates of BACE1, causes reduced spine density in aged mice. Because some therapeutic interventions target APP processing (e.g., BACE inhibitors), those strategies may alter APP/APLP physiological function. This should be taken into account for the development of pharmaceutical treatments of Alzheimer's disease.

10 March 2021 in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJonathan Stephan
Jonathan Stephan
SESara Eitelmann
Sara Eitelmann
Min ZhouMin Zhou
Min Zhou
Astrocytes and oligodendrocytes are main players in the brain to ensure ion and neurotransmitter homeostasis, metabolic supply, and fast action potential propagation in axons. These functions are fostered by the formation of large syncytia in which mainly astrocytes and oligodendrocytes are directly coupled. Panglial networks constitute on connexin-based gap junctions in the membranes of neighboring cells that allow the passage of ions, metabolites, and currents. However, these networks are not uniform but exhibit a brain region-dependent heterogeneous connectivity influencing electrical communication and intercellular ion spread. Here, we describe different approaches to analyze gap junctional communication in acute tissue slices that can be implemented easily in most electrophysiology and imaging laboratories. These approaches include paired recordings, determination of syncytial isopotentiality, tracer coupling followed by analysis of network topography, and wide field imaging of ion sensitive dyes. These approaches are capable to reveal cellular heterogeneity causing electrical isolation of functional circuits, reduced ion-transfer between different cell types, and anisotropy of tracer coupling. With a selective or combinatory use of these methods, the results will shed light on cellular properties of glial cells and their contribution to neuronal function.

19 March 2012 in Glia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJonathan Stephan
Jonathan Stephan
NHNicole Haack
Nicole Haack
KKKarl W. Kafitz
Karl W. Kafitz
SDSimone Durry
Simone Durry
DKDaniel Koch
Daniel Koch
Christine R. RoseChristine R. Rose
Christine R. Rose

14 May 2020 in European Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLisa Felix
Lisa Felix
JSJonathan Stephan
Jonathan Stephan
Christine R. RoseChristine R. Rose
Christine R. Rose
In the rodent forebrain, the majority of astrocytes are generated during the early postnatal phase. Following differentiation, astrocytes undergo maturation which accompanies the development of the neuronal network. Neonate astrocytes exhibit a distinct morphology and domain size which differs to their mature counterparts. Moreover, many of the plasma membrane proteins prototypical for fully developed astrocytes are only expressed at low levels at neonatal stages. These include connexins and Kir4.1, which define the low membrane resistance and highly negative membrane potential of mature astrocytes. Newborn astrocytes moreover express only low amounts of GLT‐1, a glutamate transporter critical later in development. Furthermore, they show specific differences in the properties and spatio‐temporal pattern of intracellular calcium signals, resulting from differences in their repertoire of receptors and signalling pathways. Therefore, roles fulfilled by mature astrocytes, including ion and transmitter homeostasis, are underdeveloped in the young brain. Similarly, astrocytic ion signalling in response to neuronal activity, a process central to neuron–glia interaction, differs between the neonate and mature brain. This review describes the unique functional properties of astrocytes in the first weeks after birth and compares them to later stages of development. We conclude that with an immature neuronal network and wider extracellular space, astrocytic support might not be as demanding and critical compared to the mature brain. The delayed differentiation and maturation of astrocytes in the first postnatal weeks might thus reflect a reduced need for active, energy‐consuming regulation of the extracellular space and a less tight control of glial feedback onto synaptic transmission.