Tianyu Hu

Mr. Tianyu Hu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 July 2016 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
THTianyu Hu
Tianyu Hu
Yanjun SuYanjun Su
Yanjun Su
BXBao-Lin Xue
Bao-Lin Xue
JLJin Liu
Jin Liu
XZXiaoqian Zhao
Xiaoqian Zhao
QGQinghua Guo
Qinghua Guo
As a large carbon pool, global forest ecosystems are a critical component of the global carbon cycle. Accurate estimations of global forest aboveground biomass (AGB) can improve the understanding of global carbon dynamics and help to quantify anthropogenic carbon emissions. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) techniques have been proven that can accurately capture both horizontal and vertical forest structures and increase the accuracy of forest AGB estimation. In this study, we mapped the global forest AGB density at a 1-km resolution through the integration of ground inventory data, optical imagery, Geoscience Laser Altimeter System/Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite data, climate surfaces, and topographic data. Over 4000 ground inventory records were collected from published literatures to train the forest AGB estimation model and validate the resulting global forest AGB product. Our wall-to-wall global forest AGB map showed that the global forest AGB density was 210.09 Mg/ha on average, with a standard deviation of 109.31 Mg/ha. At the continental level, Africa (333.34 ± 63.80 Mg/ha) and South America (301.68 ± 67.43 Mg/ha) had higher AGB density. The AGB density in Asia, North America and Europe were 172.28 ± 94.75, 166.48 ± 84.97, and 132.97 ± 50.70 Mg/ha, respectively. The wall-to-wall forest AGB map was evaluated at plot level using independent plot measurements. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) between our predicted results and the validation plots were 0.56 and 87.53 Mg/ha, respectively. At the ecological zone level, the R2 and RMSE between our map and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change suggested values were 0.56 and 101.21 Mg/ha, respectively. Moreover, a comprehensive comparison was also conducted between our forest AGB map and other published regional AGB products. Overall, our forest AGB map showed good agreements with these regional AGB products, but some of the regional AGB products tended to underestimate forest AGB density.

26 July 2018 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shichao JinShichao Jin
Shichao Jin
Yanjun SuYanjun Su
Yanjun Su
SGShang Gao
Shang Gao
THTianyu Hu
Tianyu Hu
JLJin Liu
Jin Liu
QGQinghua Guo
Qinghua Guo
Canopy height is an important forest structure parameter for understanding forest ecosystem and improving global carbon stock quantification accuracy. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) can provide accurate canopy height measurements, but its application at large scales is limited. Using LiDAR-derived canopy height as ground truth to train the Random Forest (RF) algorithm and therefore predict canopy height from other remotely sensed datasets in areas without LiDAR coverage has been one of the most commonly used method in large-scale canopy height mapping. However, how variances in location, vegetation type, and spatial scale of study sites influence the RF modelling results is still a question that needs to be addressed. In this study, we selected 16 study sites (100 km2 each) with full airborne LiDAR coverage across the United States, and used the LiDAR-derived canopy height along with optical imagery, topographic data, and climate surfaces to evaluate the transferability of the RF-based canopy height prediction method. The results show a series of findings from general to complex. The RF model trained at a certain location or vegetation type cannot be transferred to other locations or vegetation types. However, by training the RF algorithm using samples from all sites with various vegetation types, a universal model can be achieved for predicting canopy height at different locations and different vegetation types with self-predicted R2 higher than 0.6 and RMSE lower than 6 m. Moreover, the influence of spatial scales on the RF prediction accuracy is noticeable when spatial extent of the study site is less than 50 km2 or the spatial resolution of the training pixel is finer than 500 m. The canopy height prediction accuracy increases with the spatial extent and the targeted spatial resolution.