Nicola Whiffin

Ms. Nicola Whiffin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2017 in Genetics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NWNicola Whiffin
Nicola Whiffin
EMEric Minikel
Eric Minikel
RWRoddy Walsh
Roddy Walsh
AOAnne H O’dOnnell-Luria
Anne H O’dOnnell-Luria
KKKonrad Karczewski
Konrad Karczewski
JWJames S Ware
James S Ware
PurposeWhole-exome and whole-genome sequencing have transformed the discovery of genetic variants that cause human Mendelian disease, but discriminating pathogenic from benign variants remains a daunting challenge. Rarity is recognized as a necessary, although not sufficient, criterion for pathogenicity, but frequency cutoffs used in Mendelian analysis are often arbitrary and overly lenient. Recent very large reference datasets, such as the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), provide an unprecedented opportunity to obtain robust frequency estimates even for very rare variants.MethodsWe present a statistical framework for the frequency-based filtering of candidate disease-causing variants, accounting for disease prevalence, genetic and allelic heterogeneity, inheritance mode, penetrance, and sampling variance in reference datasets.ResultsUsing the example of cardiomyopathy, we show that our approach reduces by two-thirds the number of candidate variants under consideration in the average exome, without removing true pathogenic variants (false-positive rate<0.001).ConclusionWe outline a statistically robust framework for assessing whether a variant is "too common" to be causative for a Mendelian disorder of interest. We present precomputed allele frequency cutoffs for all variants in the ExAC dataset.

25 January 2021 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RTRafik Tadros
Rafik Tadros
CFCatherine Francis
Catherine Francis
XXXiao Xu
Xiao Xu
AVAlexa M. C. Vermeer
Alexa M. C. Vermeer
AHAndrew R. Harper
Andrew R. Harper
CBConnie Bezzina
Connie Bezzina

19 July 2022 in Genome Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJamie Ellingford
Jamie Ellingford
JAJoo Wook Ahn
Joo Wook Ahn
RBRichard D. Bagnall
Richard D. Bagnall
DBDiana Baralle
Diana Baralle
SBStephanie Barton
Stephanie Barton
NWNicola Whiffin
Nicola Whiffin
Background: The majority of clinical genetic testing focuses almost exclusively on regions of the genome that directly encode proteins. The important role of variants in non-coding regions in penetrant disease is, however, increasingly being demonstrated, and the use of whole genome sequencing in clinical diagnostic settings is rising across a large range of genetic disorders. Despite this, there is no existing guidance on how current guidelines designed primarily for variants in protein-coding regions should be adapted for variants identified in other genomic contexts. Methods: We convened a panel of nine clinical and research scientists with wide-ranging expertise in clinical variant interpretation, with specific experience in variants within non-coding regions. This panel discussed and refined an initial draft of the guidelines which were then extensively tested and reviewed by external groups. Results: We discuss considerations specifically for variants in non-coding regions of the genome. We outline how to define candidate regulatory elements, highlight examples of mechanisms through which non-coding region variants can lead to penetrant monogenic disease, and outline how existing guidelines can be adapted for the interpretation of these variants. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to increase the number and range of non-coding region variants that can be clinically interpreted, which, together with a compatible phenotype, can lead to new diagnoses and catalyse the discovery of novel disease mechanisms.

27 May 2012 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCThe Colorectal Tumour Gene Identification (CORGI) Consortium
The Colorectal Tumour Gene Identification (CORGI) Consortium
MDMalcolm G Dunlop
Malcolm G Dunlop
TGThe Swedish Low-Risk Colorectal Cancer Study Group
The Swedish Low-Risk Colorectal Cancer Study Group
TGThe COIN Collaborative Group
The COIN Collaborative Group
SDSara E Dobbins
Sara E Dobbins
Richard HoulstonRichard Houlston
Richard Houlston

2 June 2011 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ITIan P. M. Tomlinson
Ian P. M. Tomlinson
LCLuis G. Carvajal-Carmona
Luis G. Carvajal-Carmona
SDSara E. Dobbins
Sara E. Dobbins
ATAlbert Tenesa
Albert Tenesa
AJAngela M. Jones
Angela M. Jones
MDMalcolm G. Dunlop
Malcolm G. Dunlop
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 14 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) that are associated with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), and several of these tagSNPs are near bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway loci. The penalty of multiple testing implicit in GWAS increases the attraction of complementary approaches for disease gene discovery, including candidate gene- or pathway-based analyses. The strongest candidate loci for additional predisposition SNPs are arguably those already known both to have functional relevance and to be involved in disease risk. To investigate this proposition, we searched for novel CRC susceptibility variants close to the BMP pathway genes GREM1 (15q13.3), BMP4 (14q22.2), and BMP2 (20p12.3) using sample sets totalling 24,910 CRC cases and 26,275 controls. We identified new, independent CRC predisposition SNPs close to BMP4 (rs1957636, P = 3.93×10−10) and BMP2 (rs4813802, P = 4.65×10−11). Near GREM1, we found using fine-mapping that the previously-identified association between tagSNP rs4779584 and CRC actually resulted from two independent signals represented by rs16969681 (P = 5.33×10−8) and rs11632715 (P = 2.30×10−10). As low-penetrance predisposition variants become harder to identify—owing to small effect sizes and/or low risk allele frequencies—approaches based on informed candidate gene selection may become increasingly attractive. Our data emphasise that genetic fine-mapping studies can deconvolute associations that have arisen owing to independent correlation of a tagSNP with more than one functional SNP, thus explaining some of the apparently missing heritability of common diseases. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility polymorphisms near genes that encode proteins in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway. However, most of the inherited susceptibility to CRC remains unexplained. We investigated three of the best candidate BMP genes (GREM1, BMP4, and BMP2) for additional polymorphisms associated with CRC. By extensive validation of polymorphisms with only modest evidence of association in the initial phases of the GWAS, we identified new, independent CRC predisposition polymorphisms close to BMP4 (rs1957636) and BMP2 (rs4813802). Near GREM1, we used additional genotyping around the GWAS-identified polymorphism rs4779584 to demonstrate two independent signals represented by rs16969681 and rs11632715. Common genes with modest effects on disease risk are becoming harder to identify, and approaches based on informed candidate gene selection may become increasingly attractive. In addition, genetic fine mapping around polymorphisms identified in GWAS can deconvolute associations which have arisen owing to two independent functional variants. These types of study can identify some of the apparently missing heritability of common disease.

27 May 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NWNicola Whiffin
Nicola Whiffin
KKKonrad J. Karczewski
Konrad J. Karczewski
XZXiaolei Zhang
Xiaolei Zhang
SCSonia Chothani
Sonia Chothani
MSMiriam J. Smith
Miriam J. Smith
JWJames S. Ware
James S. Ware
Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are tissue-specific cis-regulators of protein translation. Isolated reports have shown that variants that create or disrupt uORFs can cause disease. Here, in a systematic genome-wide study using 15,708 whole genome sequences, we show that variants that create new upstream start codons, and variants disrupting stop sites of existing uORFs, are under strong negative selection. This selection signal is significantly stronger for variants arising upstream of genes intolerant to loss-of-function variants. Furthermore, variants creating uORFs that overlap the coding sequence show signals of selection equivalent to coding missense variants. Finally, we identify specific genes where modification of uORFs likely represents an important disease mechanism, and report a novel uORF frameshift variant upstream of NF2 in neurofibromatosis. Our results highlight uORF-perturbing variants as an under-recognised functional class that contribute to penetrant human disease, and demonstrate the power of large-scale population sequencing data in studying non-coding variant classes.