Maria Lampridi

Mrs. Maria Lampridi

Institute for Bio-economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (CERTH)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 September 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria LampridiMaria Lampridi
Maria Lampridi
Claus SørensenClaus Sørensen
Claus Sørensen
Dionysis BochtisDionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis
This paper presents a methodological framework for the systematic literature review of agricultural sustainability studies. The framework synthesizes all the available literature review criteria and introduces a two-level analysis facilitating systematization, data mining, and methodology analysis. The framework was implemented for the systematic literature review of 38 crop agricultural sustainability assessment studies at farm-level for the last decade. The investigation of the methodologies used is of particular importance since there are no standards or norms for the sustainability assessment of farming practices. The chronological analysis revealed that the scientific community’s interest in agricultural sustainability is increasing in the last three years. The most used methods include indicator-based tools, frameworks, and indexes, followed by multicriteria methods. In the reviewed studies, stakeholder participation is proved crucial in the determination of the level of sustainability. It should also be mentioned that combinational use of methodologies is often observed, thus a clear distinction of methodologies is not always possible.

5 October 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dionysis BochtisDionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis
Lefteris BenosLefteris Benos
Lefteris Benos
Maria LampridiMaria Lampridi
Maria Lampridi
VMVasso Marinoudi
Vasso Marinoudi
Simon PearsonSimon Pearson
Simon Pearson
Claus SørensenClaus Sørensen
Claus Sørensen
COVID-19 and the restrictive measures towards containing the spread of its infections have seriously affected the agricultural workforce and jeopardized food security. The present study aims at assessing the COVID-19 pandemic impacts on agricultural labor and suggesting strategies to mitigate them. To this end, after an introduction to the pandemic background, the negative consequences on agriculture and the existing mitigation policies, risks to the agricultural workers were benchmarked across the United States’ Standard Occupational Classification system. The individual tasks associated with each occupation in agricultural production were evaluated on the basis of potential COVID-19 infection risk. As criteria, the most prevalent virus transmission mechanisms were considered, namely the possibility of touching contaminated surfaces and the close proximity of workers. The higher risk occupations within the sector were identified, which facilitates the allocation of worker protection resources to the occupations where they are most needed. In particular, the results demonstrated that 50% of the agricultural workforce and 54% of the workers’ annual income are at moderate to high risk. As a consequence, a series of control measures need to be adopted so as to enhance the resilience and sustainability of the sector as well as protect farmers including physical distancing, hygiene practices, and personal protection equipment.

16 December 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEirini Aivazidou
Eirini Aivazidou
Georgios F. BaniasGeorgios F. Banias
Georgios F. Banias
Maria LampridiMaria Lampridi
Maria Lampridi
GVGiorgos Vasileiadis
Giorgos Vasileiadis
Athanasios AnagnostisAthanasios Anagnostis
Athanasios Anagnostis
Dionysis BochtisDionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis
As projections highlight that half of the global population will be living in regions facing severe water scarcity by 2050, sustainable water management policies and practices are more imperative than ever. Following the Sustainable Development Goals for equitable water access and prudent use of natural resources, emerging digital technologies may foster efficient monitoring, control, optimization, and forecasting of freshwater consumption and pollution. Indicatively, the use of sensors, Internet of Things, machine learning, and big data analytics has been catalyzing smart water management. With two-thirds of the global population to be living in urban areas by 2050, this research focuses on the impact of digitization on sustainable urban water management. More specifically, existing scientific literature studies were explored for providing meaningful insights on smart water technologies implemented in urban contexts, emphasizing supply and distribution networks. The review analysis outcomes were classified according to three main pillars identified: (i) level of analysis (i.e., municipal or residential/industrial); (ii) technology used (e.g., sensors, algorithms); and (iii) research scope/focus (e.g., monitoring, optimization), with the use of a systematic approach. Overall, this study is expected to act as a methodological tool and guiding map of the most pertinent state-of-the-art research efforts to integrate digitalization in the field of water stewardship and improve urban sustainability.

5 April 2019 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria LampridiMaria Lampridi
Maria Lampridi
Dimitrios KaterisDimitrios Kateris
Dimitrios Kateris
GVGiorgos Vasileiadis
Giorgos Vasileiadis
VMVasso Marinoudi
Vasso Marinoudi
Simon PearsonSimon Pearson
Simon Pearson
Dionysis BochtisDionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis
The need to intensify agriculture to meet increasing nutritional needs, in combination with the evolution of unmanned autonomous systems has led to the development of a series of “smart” farming technologies that are expected to replace or complement conventional machinery and human labor. This paper proposes a preliminary methodology for the economic analysis of the employment of robotic systems in arable farming. This methodology is based on the basic processes for estimating the use cost for agricultural machinery. However, for the case of robotic systems, no average norms for the majority of the operational parameters are available. Here, we propose a novel estimation process for these parameters in the case of robotic systems. As a case study, the operation of light cultivation has been selected due the technological readiness for this type of operation.

2 November 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVasso Marinoudi
Vasso Marinoudi
Maria LampridiMaria Lampridi
Maria Lampridi
Dimitrios KaterisDimitrios Kateris
Dimitrios Kateris
Simon PearsonSimon Pearson
Simon Pearson
Claus SørensenClaus Sørensen
Claus Sørensen
Dionysis BochtisDionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis
Robotics and computerization have drastically changed the agricultural production sector and thus moved it into a new automation era. Robots have historically been used for carrying out routine tasks that require physical strength, accuracy, and repeatability, whereas humans are used to engage with more value-added tasks that need reasoning and decision-making skills. On the other hand, robots are also increasingly exploited in several non-routine tasks that require cognitive skills. This technological evolution will create a fundamental and an unavoidable transformation of the agricultural occupations landscape with a high social and economic impact in terms of jobs creation and jobs destruction. To that effect, the aim of the present work is two-fold: (a) to map agricultural occupations in terms of their cognitive/manual and routine/non-routine characteristics and (b) to assess the susceptibility of each agricultural occupation to robotization. Seventeen (17) agricultural occupations were reviewed in relation to the characteristics of each individual task they entail and mapped onto a two-dimensional space representing the manual versus cognitive nature and the routine versus non-routine nature of an occupation. Subsequently, the potential for robotization was investigated, again concerning each task individually, and resulted in a weighted average potential adoption rate for each one of the agricultural occupations. It can be concluded that most of the occupations entail manual tasks that need to be performed in a standardised manner. Considering also that almost 81% of the agricultural work force is involved with these activities, it turns out that there is strong evidence for possible robotization of 70% of the agricultural domain, which, in turn, could affect 56% of the total annual budget dedicated to agricultural occupations. The presented work silhouettes the expected transformation of occupational landscape in agricultural production as an effort for a subsequent identification of social threats in terms of unemployment and job and wages polarization, among others, but also of opportunities in terms of emerged skills and training requirements for a social sustainable development of agricultural domain.

10 February 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria LampridiMaria Lampridi
Maria Lampridi
Dimitrios KaterisDimitrios Kateris
Dimitrios Kateris
Claus SørensenClaus Sørensen
Claus Sørensen
Dionysis BochtisDionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis
The calculation of the energy cost of a cultivation is a determining factor in the overall assessment of agricultural sustainability. Most studies mainly examine the entire life cycle of the operation, considering reference values and reference databases for the determination of the machinery contribution to the overall energy balance. This study presents a modelling methodology for the precise calculation of the energy cost of performing an agricultural operation. The model incorporates operational management into the calculation, while simultaneously considering the commercially available machinery (implements and tractors). As a case study, the operation of tillage was used considering both primary and secondary tillage (moldboard plow and field cultivator, respectively). The results show the importance of including specific operation parameters and the available machinery as part of determining the accurate total energy consumption, even though the field size and available time do not have a significant effect.