The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B or Akt (PKB/Akt) signaling pathways are considered as two but somewhat interconnected significant immune pathways which play complex roles in a variety of physiological processes as well as pathological conditions. Aberrant activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways has been reported to be associated in a wide variety of human diseases. Over the past few years, growing evidence in in vitro and in vivo models suggest that this sophisticated and subtle cascade mediates the orchestration of the immune response in health and disease through exposure to probiotics. An expanding body of literature has highlighted the contribution of probiotics and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways in gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic syndrome, skin diseases, allergy, salmonella infection, and aging. However, longitudinal human studies are possibly required to verify more conclusively whether the investigational tools used to understand the regulation of these pathways might provide effective approaches in the prevention and treatment of various disorders. In this Review, we summarize the experimental evidence from recent peer-reviewed studies and provide a brief overview of the causal relationship between the effects of probiotics and their metabolites on the components of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways and human disease.

The gut microbiota plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis in the human body, and the disruption of these communities can lead to compromised host health and the onset of disease. Current research on probiotics is quite promising and, in particular, these microorganisms have demonstrated their potential for use as adjuvants for the treatment of colorectal cancer. This review addresses the possible applications of probiotics, postbiotics, synbiotics, and next-generation probiotics in colorectal cancer research.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the causative agent of COVID-19, now represents the sixth Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)—as declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) since 2009. Considering that SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted via the mucosal route, a therapy administered by this same route may represent a desirable approach to fight SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is now widely accepted that genetically modified microorganisms, including probiotics, represent attractive vehicles for oral or nasal mucosal delivery of therapeutic molecules. Previous studies have shown that the mucosal administration of therapeutic molecules is able to induce an immune response mediated by specific serum IgG and mucosal IgA antibodies along with mucosal cell-mediated immune responses, which effectively concur to neutralize and eradicate infections. Therefore, advances in the modulation of mucosal immune responses, and in particular the use of probiotics as live delivery vectors, may encourage prospective studies to assess the effectiveness of genetically modified probiotics for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerging trends in the ever-progressing field of vaccine development re-emphasize the contribution of adjuvants, along with optimization of codon usage (when designing a synthetic gene), expression level, and inoculation dose to elicit specific and potent protective immune responses. In this review, we will highlight the existing pre-clinical and clinical information on the use of genetically modified microorganisms in control strategies against respiratory and non-respiratory viruses. In addition, we will discuss some controversial aspects of the use of genetically modified probiotics in modulating the cross-talk between mucosal delivery of therapeutics and immune system modulation.

A dose-escalation, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I clinical trial was performed in healthy Iranian volunteer women to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of NZ8123-HPV16-optiE7 vaccine involving recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing the codon-optimized human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 E7 oncogene. Fifty-five eligible subjects were divided into 6 cohorts based on the dosages (1 × 109, 5 × 109, and 1 × 1010 CFU/mL) of either vaccine or placebo, which were administrated orally a total of 4 times at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8. Then, adverse events, specific serum IgG and vaginal IgA, and E7-specific IFNγ-secreting CD8+ CTL responses were evaluated. The vaccination was well tolerated by 40 subjects who completed the immunization schedule, and no serious adverse effects were reported. The IgG and IgA levels peaked at day 60, and the levels for the 5 × 109 CFU/mL and 1 × 1010 CFU/mL dose groups were higher than those for the 1 × 109 CFU/mL dose group. Time-to-peak stimulation in E7-specific IFNγ-secreting CD8+ CTL responses was seen in cervical lymphocytes 1 month after the last vaccination. Again, no significant increase was seen in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of the same volunteers. CTL responses in cervical lymphocytes and PBMCs at day 90 were markedly higher in the 5 × 109 and 1 × 1010 CFU/mL groups than in the 1 × 109 CFU/mL group, demonstrating the dose dependency of NZ8123-HPV16-optiE7 vaccine following oral administration. The 6-month follow-up revealed that antibody levels decreased up to day 240; nevertheless, long-term E7-specific IFNγ-secreting CD8+ CTL responses were recorded during follow-up. Overall, the safety and immunogenicity profile achieved in this study encourages further phase II trials with the 5 × 109 CFU/mL dose vaccine.

Background: In December 2019, an unbelievable outbreak of pneumonia associated with coronavirus was reported in the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province. This virus was called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although much effort has been spent on clarifying the transmission route of SARS-CoV-2, but, very little evidence is available regarding the relationship between human body fluids and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Considerable evidence from hospital in Wuhan indicates that strict rules to avoid occupational exposure to patients’ body fluids in healthcare settings, particularly among every medical staff, limited person-to-person transmission of nosocomial infections by direct or indirect contact. Conclusion: We tried to provide important information for understanding the possible transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 via body fluids including bronchoalveolar-lavage, saliva, blood, urine, feces, sputum, tears, and semen in order to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurrences.