Petar Radanliev

Dr. Petar Radanliev

Oxford e-Research Centre, University of Oxford, 7 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QG, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2025 in Applied Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Petar RadanlievPetar Radanliev
Petar Radanliev

27 August 2020 in AI & SOCIETY
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Petar RadanlievPetar Radanliev
Petar Radanliev
DRDavid De Roure
David De Roure
MKMax Van Kleek
Max Van Kleek
Omar SantosOmar Santos
Omar Santos
UAUchenna Daniel Ani
Uchenna Daniel Ani
This article conducts a literature review of current and future challenges in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in cyber physical systems. The literature review is focused on identifying a conceptual framework for increasing resilience with AI through automation supporting both, a technical and human level. The methodology applied resembled a literature review and taxonomic analysis of complex internet of things (IoT) interconnected and coupled cyber physical systems. There is an increased attention on propositions on models, infrastructures and frameworks of IoT in both academic and technical papers. These reports and publications frequently represent a juxtaposition of other related systems and technologies (e.g. Industrial Internet of Things, Cyber Physical Systems, Industry 4.0 etc.). We review academic and industry papers published between 2010 and 2020. The results determine a new hierarchical cascading conceptual framework for analysing the evolution of AI decision-making in cyber physical systems. We argue that such evolution is inevitable and autonomous because of the increased integration of connected devices (IoT) in cyber physical systems. To support this argument, taxonomic methodology is adapted and applied for transparency and justifications of concepts selection decisions through building summary maps that are applied for designing the hierarchical cascading conceptual framework.

27 March 2024 in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Petar RadanlievPetar Radanliev
Petar Radanliev
OSOmar Santos
Omar Santos
ABAlistair Brandon-Jones
Alistair Brandon-Jones
AJAdam Joinson
Adam Joinson
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent, protecting personal privacy is a critical ethical issue that must be addressed. This article explores the need for ethical AI systems that safeguard individual privacy while complying with ethical standards. By taking a multidisciplinary approach, the research examines innovative algorithmic techniques such as differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, federated learning, international regulatory frameworks, and ethical guidelines. The study concludes that these algorithms effectively enhance privacy protection while balancing the utility of AI with the need to protect personal data. The article emphasises the importance of a comprehensive approach that combines technological innovation with ethical and regulatory strategies to harness the power of AI in a way that respects and protects individual privacy.

1 November 2018 in Computers in Industry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Petar RadanlievPetar Radanliev
Petar Radanliev
DRDavid De Roure
David De Roure
RNRazvan Nicolescu
Razvan Nicolescu
MHMichael Huth
Michael Huth
RMRafael Mantilla Montalvo
Rafael Mantilla Montalvo
PBPeter Burnap
Peter Burnap

24 May 2021 in International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Petar RadanlievPetar Radanliev
Petar Radanliev
DRDavid De Roure
David De Roure
RNRazvan Nicolescu
Razvan Nicolescu
MHMichael Huth
Michael Huth
OSOmar Santos
Omar Santos
This paper presents a summary of mechanisms for the evolution of artificial intelligence in ‘internet of things’ networks. Firstly, the paper investigates how the use of new technologies in industrial systems improves organisational resilience supporting both a technical and human level. Secondly, the paper reports empirical results that correlate academic literature with Industry 4.0 interdependencies between edge components to both external and internal services and systems. The novelty of the paper is a new approach for creating a virtual representation operating as a real-time digital counterpart of a physical object or process (i.e., digital twin) outlined in a conceptual diagram. The methodology applied in this paper resembled a grounded theory analysis of complex interconnected and coupled systems. By connecting the human–computer interactions in different information knowledge management systems, this paper presents a summary of mechanisms for the evolution of artificial intelligence in internet of things networks.

17 June 2025 in Frontiers in Digital Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Petar RadanlievPetar Radanliev
Petar Radanliev
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into wearable sensor technologies has substantially advanced health data science, enabling continuous monitoring, personalised interventions, and predictive analytics. However, the fast advancement of these technologies has raised critical ethical and regulatory concerns, particularly around data privacy, algorithmic bias, informed consent, and the opacity of automated decision-making. This study undertakes a systematic examination of these challenges, highlighting the risks posed by unregulated data aggregation, biased model training, and inadequate transparency in AI-powered health applications. Through an analysis of current privacy frameworks and empirical assessment of publicly available datasets, the study identifies significant disparities in model performance across demographic groups and exposes vulnerabilities in both technical design and ethical governance. To address these issues, this article introduces a data-driven methodological framework that embeds transparency, accountability, and regulatory alignment across all stages of AI development. The framework operationalises ethical principles through concrete mechanisms, including explainable AI, bias mitigation techniques, and consent-aware data processing pipelines, while aligning with legal standards such as the GDPR, the UK Data Protection Act, and the EU AI Act. By incorporating transparency as a structural and procedural requirement, the framework presented in this article offers a replicable model for the responsible development of AI systems in wearable healthcare. In doing so, the study advocates for a regulatory paradigm that balances technological innovation with the protection of individual rights, fostering fair, secure, and trustworthy AI-driven health monitoring.