Ify Mordi

Ify Mordi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSonia Shah
Sonia Shah
AHAlbert Henry
Albert Henry
CRCarolina Roselli
Carolina Roselli
HLHonghuang Lin
Honghuang Lin
GSGarðar Sveinbjörnsson
Garðar Sveinbjörnsson
RLR. Thomas Lumbers
R. Thomas Lumbers
Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. A small proportion of HF cases are attributable to monogenic cardiomyopathies and existing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yielded only limited insights, leaving the observed heritability of HF largely unexplained. We report results from a GWAS meta-analysis of HF comprising 47,309 cases and 930,014 controls. Twelve independent variants at 11 genomic loci are associated with HF, all of which demonstrate one or more associations with coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, or reduced left ventricular function, suggesting shared genetic aetiology. Functional analysis of non-CAD-associated loci implicate genes involved in cardiac development (MYOZ1, SYNPO2L), protein homoeostasis (BAG3), and cellular senescence (CDKN1A). Mendelian randomisation analysis supports causal roles for several HF risk factors, and demonstrates CAD-independent effects for atrial fibrillation, body mass index, and hypertension. These findings extend our knowledge of the pathways underlying HF and may inform new therapeutic strategies.

29 January 2019 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLinda Long
Linda Long
IMIfy Mordi
Ify Mordi
CBCharlene Bridges
Charlene Bridges
VSViral A Sagar
Viral A Sagar
EDEdward J Davies
Edward J Davies
RTRod S. Taylor
Rod S. Taylor

1 January 2017 in JACC: Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAndrea Di Marco
Andrea Di Marco
IAIgnasi Anguera
Ignasi Anguera
MSMatthias Schmitt
Matthias Schmitt
IKIgor Klem
Igor Klem
TNTomas G. Neilan
Tomas G. Neilan
ÁCÁngel Cequier
Ángel Cequier

27 April 2014 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RTRod S. Taylor
Rod S. Taylor
VSViral A Sagar
Viral A Sagar
EDEdward J Davies
Edward J Davies
SBSimon Briscoe
Simon Briscoe
ACAndrew Js Coats
Andrew Js Coats
IMIfy Mordi
Ify Mordi

1 May 2014 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDavid Carrick
David Carrick
KOKeith G. Oldroyd
Keith G. Oldroyd
MMMargaret McEntegart
Margaret McEntegart
CHCaroline Haig
Caroline Haig
MPMark C. Petrie
Mark C. Petrie
CBColin Berry
Colin Berry
The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI. This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in reperfused STEMI patients with ≥1 risk factors for no-reflow. Randomization was to deferred stenting with an intention-to-stent 4 to 16 h later or conventional treatment with immediate stenting. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction ≤2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 days and 6 months after myocardial infarction. Myocardial salvage was the final infarct size indexed to the initial area at risk. Of 411 STEMI patients (March 11, 2012 to November 21, 2012), 101 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% male) were randomized (52 to the deferred stenting group, 49 to the immediate stenting). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to the second procedure in the deferred stenting group was 9 h (IQR: 6 to 12 h). Fewer patients in the deferred stenting group had no-/slow-reflow (14 [29%] vs. 3 [6%]; p = 0.006), no reflow (7 [14%] vs. 1 [2%]; p = 0.052) and intraprocedural thrombotic events (16 [33%] vs. 5 [10%]; p = 0.010). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction coronary flow grades at the end of PCI were higher in the deferred stenting group (p = 0.018). Recurrent STEMI occurred in 2 patients in the deferred stenting group before the second procedure. Myocardial salvage index at 6 months was greater in the deferred stenting group (68 [IQR: 54% to 82%] vs. 56 [IQR: 31% to 72%]; p = 0.031]. In high-risk STEMI patients, deferred stenting in primary PCI reduced no-reflow and increased myocardial salvage. (Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI; NCT01717573).

3 November 2020 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNatalie A. Mordi
Natalie A. Mordi
IMIfy Mordi
Ify Mordi
JSJagdeep S. Singh
Jagdeep S. Singh
RMRory McCrimmon
Rory McCrimmon
ASAllan D. Struthers
Allan D. Struthers
CLChim C. Lang
Chim C. Lang
Background: SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors improve heart failure–associated outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. In patients with heart failure, SGLT2 inhibitors will likely be coprescribed with a loop diuretic, but this combined effect is not well-defined. Our aim was to assess the diuretic and natriuretic effect of empagliflozin in combination with loop diuretics. Methods: The RECEDE-CHF trial (SGLT2 Inhibition in Combination With Diuretics in Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction taking regular loop diuretic who were randomized to empagliflozin 25 mg once daily or placebo for 6 weeks with a 2-week washout period. The primary outcome was change in 24-hour urinary volume from baseline to week 6. Results: Twenty-three participants (mean age, 69.8 years; 73.9% male; mean furosemide dose, 49.6±31.3 mg/d; mean HbA1c, 7.9±3.8%) were recruited. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin caused a significant increase in 24-hour urinary volume at both day 3 (mean difference, 535 mL [95% CI, 133–936]; P =0.005) and week 6 (mean difference, 545 mL [95% CI, 136–954]; P =0.005) after adjustment for treatment order, baseline 24-hour urine volume, and percentage change in loop diuretic dose. At 6 weeks, empagliflozin did not cause a significant change in 24-hour urinary sodium (mean difference, −7.85 mmol/L [95% CI, −2.43 to 6.73]; P =0.57). Empagliflozin caused a nonsignificant increase in fractional excretion of sodium at day 3, which was absent at week 6 (mean difference day 3, 0.30% [95% CI, −0.03 to 0.63]; P =0.09; week 6, 0.11% [95% CI, −0.22 to 0.44]; P >0.99), and a significant increase in electrolyte-free water clearance at week 6 (mean difference, 312 mL [95% CI, 26–598]; P =0.026) compared with placebo. Empagliflozin also caused significant reductions in body weight and serum urate at week 6. Conclusions: Empagliflozin caused a significant increase in 24-hour urine volume without an increase in urinary sodium when used in combination with loop diuretic. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT03226457.