Although the need to assess hydration is well recognized, laboratory tests and clinical impressions are impractical and lack sensitivity, respectively, to be clinically meaningful. Different approaches use bioelectrical impedance measurements to overcome some of these limitations and aid in the classification of hydration status. One indirect approach utilizes single or multiple frequency bioimpedance in regression equations and theoretical models, respectively, with anthropometric measurements to predict fluid volumes (bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy—BIS) and estimate fluid overload based on the deviation of calculated to reference extracellular fluid volume. Alternatively, bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) uses direct phase-sensitive measurements of resistance and reactance, measured at 50 kHz, normalized for standing height, then plotted on a bivariate graph, resulting in a vector with length related to fluid content, and direction with phase angle that indexes hydration status. Comparison with healthy population norms enables BIVA to classify (normal, under-, and over-) and rank (change relative to pre-treatment) hydration independent of body weight. Each approach has wide-ranging uses in evaluation and management of clinical groups with over-hydration with an evolving emphasis on prognosis. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of BIS and BIVA for hydration assessment with comments on future applications.

Injuries to lower limb muscles are common among football players. Localized bioimpedance analysis (BIA) utilizes electrical measurements to assess soft tissue hydration and cell membrane integrity non-invasively. This study reports the effects of the severity of muscle injury and recovery on BIA variables. We made serial tetra-polar, phase-sensitive 50 kHz localized BIA measurements of quadriceps, hamstring and calf muscles of three male football players before and after injury and during recovery until return-to-play, to determine changes in BIA variables (resistance (R), reactance (Xc) and phase angle (PA)) in different degrees of muscle injury. Compared to non-injury values, R, Xc and PA decreased with increasing muscle injury severity: grade III (23.1%, 45.1% and 27.6%), grade II (20.6%, 31.6% and 13.3%) and grade I (11.9%, 23.5% and 12.1%). These findings indicate that decreases in R reflect localized fluid accumulation, and reductions in Xc and PA highlight disruption of cellular membrane integrity and injury. Localized BIA measurements of muscle groups enable the practical detection of soft tissue injury and its severity.

Muscle injuries in the lower limb are common among professional football players. Classification is made according to severity and is diagnosed with radiological assessment as: grade I (minor strain or minor injury), grade II (partial rupture, moderate injury) and grade III (complete rupture, severe injury). Tetrapolar localized bioimpedance analysis (BIA) at 50 kHz made with a phase-sensitive analyzer was used to assess damage to the integrity of muscle structures and the fluid accumulation 24 h after injury in 21 injuries in the quadriceps, hamstring and calf, and was diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to identify the pattern of change in BIA variables as indicators of fluid [resistance (R)] and cell structure integrity [reactance (Xc) and phase angle (PA)] according to the severity of the MRI-defined injury. The % difference compared to the non-injured contralateral muscle also measured 24-h after injury of R, Xc and PA were respectively: grade I (n = 11; -10.4, -17.5 and -9.0%), grade II (n = 8; -18.4, -32.9 and -16.6%) and grade III (n = 2; -14.1, -52.9 and -43.1%), showing a greater significant decrease in Xc (p < 0.001). The greatest relative changes were in grade III injuries. However, decreases in R, that indicate fluid distribution, were not proportional to the severity of the injury. Disruption of the muscle structure, demonstrated by the localized determination of Xc, increased with the severity of muscle injury. The most significant changes 24 h after injury was the sizeable decrease in Xc that indicates a pattern of disrupted soft tissue structure, proportional to the severity of the injury.

In this work, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) method is used in a sample of haemodialysis patients in stable (without oedema) and critical (hyperhydrated and malnutrition) states, in order to establish the relation between hyperhydration (oedema) and mortality. The measurements obtained were single frequency (50 kHz), tetrapolar (hand-foot) complex impedance measurements (vector components are: resistance R and reactance Xc). The impedance components were standardized by the height H of the subjects, (R/H and Xc/H) to obtain de impedance vector Z/H, that is represented in the RXc plot (abscise R/H, ordinate Xc/H). Measurements were performed on a sample of 74 patients (30 men and 44 women, 18-70 year, body mass index (BMI), 19-30 kg m(-2)) at the Saturnino Lora University Hospital in Santiago de Cuba. The 46 stable patients comprised 28 men and 18 women; the 28 critical patients 16 men and 12 women. The reference population consisted of 1196 healthy adult subjects living in Santiago de Cuba (689 men and 507 women, 18-70 year, BMI 19-30 kg m(-2)). We used the RXc plot with the BIVA method to characterize the reference population using the 50%, 75% and 95% tolerance ellipses. Student's t-test and Hotelling's T2-test were used to analyse the separation of groups obtained by means of clinical diagnosis and those obtained by BIVA. We obtained a significant difference (P < 0.05) in R/H, Xc/H and phase angle (PA) in men as in women between the location of Z/H vectors in the RXc graph and the separation made by the doctors between stable and critical patients. Critical (hyperhydrated) patients were located below the inferior pole of the 75% tolerance ellipse, whereas stable patients were within the tolerance ellipses. Some cases classified as stable by the clinic were classified as hyperhydrated by BIVA with 100% sensitivity and 48% specificity. In conclusion, the BIVA method could be used to classify patients by hydration state and to predict survival. Advantages of the method are its simplicity, objectivity and that it does not require the definition of patient dry weight.

The purpose of this study is to compare measurement errors in two commercially available multi-frequency bioimpedance analyzers, a Xitron 4000B and an ImpediMed SFB7, including electrode impedance mismatch. The comparison was made using resistive electrical models and in ten human volunteers. We used three different electrical models simulating three different body segments: the right-side, leg and thorax. In the electrical models, we tested the effect of the capacitive coupling of the patient to ground and the skin-electrode impedance mismatch. Results showed that both sets of equipment are optimized for right-side measurements and for moderate skin-electrode impedance mismatch. In right-side measurements with mismatch electrode, 4000B is more accurate than SFB7. When an electrode impedance mismatch was simulated, errors increased in both bioimpedance analyzers and the effect of the mismatch in the voltage detection leads was greater than that in current injection leads. For segments with lower impedance as the leg and thorax, SFB7 is more accurate than 4000B and also shows less dependence on electrode mismatch. In both devices, impedance measurements were not significantly affected (p > 0.05) by the capacitive coupling to ground.