Megan Sweeney

Ms. Megan Sweeney

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Global Advances in Health and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRobert Bonakdar
Robert Bonakdar
DPDania Palanker
Dania Palanker
MSMegan Sweeney
Megan Sweeney
Background: In 2017, the American College of Physicians (ACP) released guidelines encouraging nonpharmacologic treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP). These guidelines recommended utilization of treatments including multidisciplinary rehabilitation, acupuncture, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), tai chi, yoga, progressive relaxation, biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and spinal manipulation. Objective: We aimed to determine status of insurance coverage status for multiple nonpharmacological pain therapies based on the 2017 Essential Health Benefits (EHB) benchmark plans across all states. Methods: The 2017 EHB benchmark plans represent the minimum benefits required in all new policies in the individual and small group health insurance markets and were reviewed for coverage of treatments for LBP recommended by the ACP guidelines. Additionally, plans were reviewed for limitations and exclusionary criteria. Results: In nearly all state-based coverage policies, chronic pain management and multidisciplinary rehabilitation were not addressed. Coverage was most extensive (supported by 46 states) for spinal manipulation. Acupuncture, massage, and biofeedback were each covered by fewer than 10 states, while MBSR, tai chi, and yoga were not covered by any states. Behavioral health treatment (CBT and biofeedback) coverage was often covered solely for mental health diagnoses, although excluded for treating LBP. Conclusion: Other than spinal manipulation, evidence-based, nonpharmacological therapies recommended by the 2017 ACP guidelines were routinely excluded from EHB benchmark plans. Insurance coverage discourages multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic pain management by providing ambiguous guidelines, restricting ongoing treatments, and excluding behavioral or complementary therapy despite a cohesive evidence base. Better EHB plan coverage of nondrug therapies may be a strategy to mitigate the opioid crisis. Recommendations that reflect current research-based findings are provided to update chronic pain policy statements.

22 June 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMelody Hermel
Melody Hermel
MSMegan Sweeney
Megan Sweeney
EAEdsel Abud
Edsel Abud
KLKathleen Luskin
Kathleen Luskin
JCJose P. Criado
Jose P. Criado
TAThomas Ahern
Thomas Ahern
We report a case of new-onset postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome in a healthy 46-year-old female after a single dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. There have been three prior reports of new-onset postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination. Predominant symptoms noted included fatigue, brain fog, headache, sinus tachycardia, and dizziness. Management includes noninvasive therapies, behavioral approaches, and pharmacologic regimens. Here, the patient presented with fatigue, palpitations, dizziness, and presyncope, with symptoms beginning 7 days after vaccination. Presenting vitals included temperature within normal limits, inappropriate tachycardia, up to 120 beats per minute, blood pressure of 128/87 mm of mercury, and 100% saturation in room air. Her management included lifestyle changes, dietary supplements, and ivabradine. Further studies are needed to evaluate prevalence, etiology, and optimal management.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMelody Hermel
Melody Hermel
MSMegan Sweeney
Megan Sweeney
YNYu-Ming Ni
Yu-Ming Ni
RBRobert Bonakdar
Robert Bonakdar
DTDouglas Triffon
Douglas Triffon
JGJames Gray
James Gray
Worldwide, the turmoil of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has generated a burst of research efforts in search of effective prevention and treatment modalities. Current recommendations on natural supplements arise from mostly anecdotal evidence in other viral infections and expert opinion, and many clinical trials are ongoing. Here the authors review the evidence and rationale for the use of natural supplements for prevention and treatment of COVID-19, including those with potential benefit and those with potential harms. Specifically, the authors review probiotics, dietary patterns, micronutrients, antioxidants, polyphenols, melatonin, and cannabinoids. Authors critically evaluated and summarized the biomedical literature published in peer-reviewed journals, preprint servers, and current guidelines recommended by expert scientific governing bodies. Ongoing and future trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov were also recorded, appraised, and considered in conjunction with the literature findings. In light of the controversial issues surrounding the manufacturing and marketing of natural supplements and limited scientific evidence available, the authors assessed the available data and present this review to equip clinicians with the necessary information regarding the evidence for and potential harms of usage to promote open discussions with patients who are considering dietary supplements to prevent and treat COVID-19.

1 December 2021 in Journal of Clinical Neuromuscular Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSwathi Beladakere Ramaswamy
Swathi Beladakere Ramaswamy
SSShivangi Singh
Shivangi Singh
SHSara Hooshmand
Sara Hooshmand
CJCho Junsang
Cho Junsang
MSMegan Sweeney
Megan Sweeney
RGRaghav Govindarajan
Raghav Govindarajan
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is one of the extensively studied autoimmune disorder. There has been a dramatic increase in research to further understand molecular pathogenesis of MG and clinical trials for new drugs in MG treatment in the past decade. This review article is to consolidate the available information in simple terms with students, residents, and fellows as target audience for easy learning and help application of this knowledge to clinical practice.

27 April 2023 in JMIR Formative Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMegan Sweeney
Megan Sweeney
WBWilliam Barton
William Barton
CNCamille Nebeker
Camille Nebeker
Background: Smartphone use has increased dramatically and, in parallel, a market for mobile apps, including health apps, has emerged. The business model of targeted mobile app advertisements allows for the collection of personal and potentially sensitive information, often without user knowledge. Older adults comprise a rapidly growing demographic that is potentially vulnerable to exploitation by those accessing data collected via these apps. Objective: This research examined apps that claimed to be useful to older adults with a goal of (1) classifying the functionality of each app, (2) identifying whether a privacy policy existed and was accessible, and (3) evaluating evidence that could support claims of value to older adults. Methods: An environmental scan was conducted using the Google search engine and typing “apps for older adults.” The first 25 sites that this search returned comprised the primary data for this study. Data were organized by descriptive features of purpose (eg, health, finance, and utility), the existence of an electronically accessible privacy policy, price, and evidence supporting each recommended mobile app. Results: A total of 133 mobile apps were identified and promoted as being the best “apps for older adults.” Of these 133 mobile apps, 83% (n=110) included a privacy policy. Fewer apps designated in the “medical” category included a privacy policy than those classified otherwise. Conclusions: The results suggest that most mobile apps targeting older adults include a privacy policy. Research is needed to determine whether these privacy policies are readable, succinct, and incorporate accessible data use and sharing practices to mitigate potential risks, particularly when collecting potentially sensitive health information.

18 December 2023 in Journal of the American Nutrition Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRobert A. Bonakdar
Robert A. Bonakdar
MSMegan Sweeney
Megan Sweeney
CGCathy Garvey
Cathy Garvey
AWAndrew A. White
Andrew A. White
MVMichelle U. VanNoord
Michelle U. VanNoord
Migraine and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can be difficult-to-treat comorbidities that may be driven by underlying gut-brain axis dysfunction. This report describes utilization of a low-FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet (LFD) in a patient with refractory migraine and co-occurring IBS. After unremarkable physical and neurological examinations, a 57-year-old woman with IBS and chronic migraine was started on a LFD under the guidance of a registered dietician. Psychometrically validated surveys administered at baseline and initial follow-up assessed patient-reported outcomes related to migraine and IBS symptoms. At baseline, the patient reported 80/90 migraine days with average pain of 8/10, a Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score of 33, and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score of 64, the latter 2 scores indicating severe disability. Baseline IBS symptom severity was noted at 9/10. Within 1 week on a LFD, the patient's IBS symptoms and migraines improved in both frequency and intensity of episodes. After 5 weeks on a LFD elimination, the patient's clinical improvement continued and she reported significant reduction in migraines, with average pain of 1/10 and IBS severity of 3/10. The patient also improved from severe to minimal levels of disability on validated measures (MIDAS, HIT-6, and IBS Patient Global Impression of Change). This is the first case report detailing successful initial treatment of migraine and co-occurring IBS utilizing a dietician-guided LFD. There are a number of important reasons for potential improvement in these gut-brain axis disorders which are reviewed as well as an implication for long-term management and food reintroduction. Larger, randomized trials evaluating a LFD in diverse individuals with migraine and co-occurring IBS are warranted to help confirm these results.