Juan Pedro Montávez

Prof. Juan Pedro Montávez

Departmen of Physics, University of Murcia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2012 in Monthly Weather Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Pedro JimenezPedro Jimenez
Pedro Jimenez
Jimy DudhiaJimy Dudhia
Jimy Dudhia
FRFidel Rouco
Fidel Rouco
JNJorge Navarro
Jorge Navarro
Juan Pedro MontávezJuan Pedro Montávez
Juan Pedro Montávez
EGElena García-Bustamante
Elena García-Bustamante
This study summarizes the revision performed on the surface layer formulation of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. A first set of modifications are introduced to provide more suitable similarity functions to simulate the surface layer evolution under strong stable/unstable conditions. A second set of changes are incorporated to reduce or suppress the limits that are imposed on certain variables in order to avoid undesired effects (e.g., a lower limit in u*). The changes introduced lead to a more consistent surface layer formulation that covers the full range of atmospheric stabilities. The turbulent fluxes are more (less) efficient during the day (night) in the revised scheme and produce a sharper afternoon transition that shows the largest impacts in the planetary boundary layer meteorological variables. The most important impacts in the near-surface diagnostic variables are analyzed and compared with observations from a mesoscale network.

2 October 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco TurcoMarco Turco
Marco Turco
JRJuan José Rosa-Cánovas
Juan José Rosa-Cánovas
JBJoaquín Bedia
Joaquín Bedia
Sonia JerezSonia Jerez
Sonia Jerez
Juan Pedro MontávezJuan Pedro Montávez
Juan Pedro Montávez
APAntonello Provenzale
Antonello Provenzale
The observed trend towards warmer and drier conditions in southern Europe is projected to continue in the next decades, possibly leading to increased risk of large fires. However, an assessment of climate change impacts on fires at and above the 1.5 °C Paris target is still missing. Here, we estimate future summer burned area in Mediterranean Europe under 1.5, 2, and 3 °C global warming scenarios, accounting for possible modifications of climate-fire relationships under changed climatic conditions owing to productivity alterations. We found that such modifications could be beneficial, roughly halving the fire-intensifying signals. In any case, the burned area is robustly projected to increase. The higher the warming level is, the larger is the increase of burned area, ranging from ~40% to ~100% across the scenarios. Our results indicate that significant benefits would be obtained if warming were limited to well below 2 °C.

11 December 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sonia JerezSonia Jerez
Sonia Jerez
ITIsabelle Tobin
Isabelle Tobin
RVRobert Vautard
Robert Vautard
Juan Pedro MontávezJuan Pedro Montávez
Juan Pedro Montávez
JLJose María López-Romero
Jose María López-Romero
MWMartin Wild
Martin Wild
Ambitious climate change mitigation plans call for a significant increase in the use of renewables, which could, however, make the supply system more vulnerable to climate variability and changes. Here we evaluate climate change impacts on solar photovoltaic (PV) power in Europe using the recent EURO-CORDEX ensemble of high-resolution climate projections together with a PV power production model and assuming a well-developed European PV power fleet. Results indicate that the alteration of solar PV supply by the end of this century compared with the estimations made under current climate conditions should be in the range (−14%;+2%), with the largest decreases in Northern countries. Temporal stability of power generation does not appear as strongly affected in future climate scenarios either, even showing a slight positive trend in Southern countries. Therefore, despite small decreases in production expected in some parts of Europe, climate change is unlikely to threaten the European PV sector.

23 April 2020 in Regional Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDaniela Jacob
Daniela Jacob
CTClaas Teichmann
Claas Teichmann
SSStefan Sobolowski
Stefan Sobolowski
EKEleni Katragkou
Eleni Katragkou
IAIvonne Anders
Ivonne Anders
VWVolker Wulfmeyer
Volker Wulfmeyer
The European CORDEX (EURO-CORDEX) initiative is a large voluntary effort that seeks to advance regional climate and Earth system science in Europe. As part of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) - Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX), it shares the broader goals of providing a model evaluation and climate projection framework and improving communication with both the General Circulation Model (GCM) and climate data user communities. EURO-CORDEX oversees the design and coordination of ongoing ensembles of regional climate projections of unprecedented size and resolution (0.11° EUR-11 and 0.44° EUR-44 domains). Additionally, the inclusion of empirical-statistical downscaling allows investigation of much larger multi-model ensembles. These complementary approaches provide a foundation for scientific studies within the climate research community and others. The value of the EURO-CORDEX ensemble is shown via numerous peer-reviewed studies and its use in the development of climate services. Evaluations of the EUR-44 and EUR-11 ensembles also show the benefits of higher resolution. However, significant challenges remain. To further advance scientific understanding, two flagship pilot studies (FPS) were initiated. The first investigates local-regional phenomena at convection-permitting scales over central Europe and the Mediterranean in collaboration with the Med-CORDEX community. The second investigates the impacts of land cover changes on European climate across spatial and temporal scales. Over the coming years, the EURO-CORDEX community looks forward to closer collaboration with other communities, new advances, supporting international initiatives such as the IPCC reports, and continuing to provide the basis for research on regional climate impacts and adaptation in Europe.

30 June 2000 in International Journal of Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMontávez
Montávez
Juan Pedro MontávezJuan Pedro Montávez
Juan Pedro Montávez
ARAntonio Rodríguez
Antonio Rodríguez
JIJiménez
Jiménez
JIJuan I.
Juan I.

1 October 2013 in Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sonia JerezSonia Jerez
Sonia Jerez
RTRicardo Machado Trigo
Ricardo Machado Trigo
Sergio Vicente-SerranoSergio Vicente-Serrano
Sergio Vicente-Serrano
DVDavid Pozo Vázquez
David Pozo Vázquez
RLR. Lorente-Plazas
R. Lorente-Plazas
Juan Pedro MontávezJuan Pedro Montávez
Juan Pedro Montávez
Europe is investing considerably in renewable energies for a sustainable future, with both Iberian countries (Portugal and Spain) promoting significantly new hydropower, wind, and solar plants. The climate variability in this area is highly controlled by just a few large-scale teleconnection modes. However, the relationship between these modes and the renewable climate-dependent energy resources has not yet been established in detail. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on the interannual variability of the main and primary renewable energy resources in Iberia. This is achieved through a holistic assessment that is based on a 10-km-resolution climate simulation spanning the period 1959–2007 that provides physically consistent data of the various magnitudes involved. A monthly analysis for the extended winter (October–March) months shows that negative NAO phases enhance wind speeds (10%–15%) and, thereby, wind power (estimated around 30% at typical wind-turbine altitudes) and hydropower resources (with changes in precipitation exceeding 100% and implying prolonged responses in reservoir storage and release throughout the year), while diminishing the solar potential (10%–20%). Opposite signals were also sporadically identified, being well explained when taking into account the orography and the prevailing wind direction during both NAO phases. An additional analysis using real wind, hydropower, and solar power generation data further confirms the strong signature of the NAO.