Tami Brown-Brandl

Prof. Tami Brown-Brandl

University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, United States
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2006 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TMT. L. Mader
T. L. Mader
MDM. S. Davis
M. S. Davis
TBTami Brown-Brandl
Tami Brown-Brandl
Data from 3 summer feedlot studies were utilized to determine the environmental factors that influence heat stress in cattle and also to determine wind speed (WSPD; m·s−1) and solar radiation (RAD; W·m−2) adjustments to the temperature-humidity index (THI). Visual assessments of heat stress, based on panting scores (0 = no panting to 4 = severe panting), were collected from 1400 to 1700. Mean daily WSPD, black globe temperature at 1500, and minimums for nighttime WSPD, nighttime black globe THI, and daily relative humidity were found to have the greatest influence on panting score from 1400 to 1700 (R2 = 0.61). From hourly values for THI, WSPD, and RAD, panting score was determined to equal −7.563 + (0.121 × THI) − (0.241 × WSPD) + (0.00082 × RAD) (R2 = 0.49). Using the ratio of WSPD to THI and RAD to THI (− 1.992 and 0.0068 for WSPD and RAD, respectively), adjustments to the THI were derived for WSPD and RAD. On the basis of these ratios and the average hourly data for 1400 to 1700, the THI, adjusted for WSPD and RAD, equals [4.51 + THI − (1.992 × WSPD) + (0.0068 × RAD)]. Four separate cattle studies, comparable in size, type of cattle, and number of observations to the 3 original studies, were utilized to evaluate the accuracy of the THI equation adjusted for WSPD and RAD, and the relationship between the adjusted THI and panting score. Mean panting score derived from individual observations of black-hided cattle in these 4 studies were 1.22, 0.94, 1.32, and 2.00 vs. the predicted panting scores of 1.15, 1.17, 1.30, and 1.96, respectively. Correlations between THI and panting score in these studies ranged from r = 0.47 to 0.87. Correlations between the adjusted THI and mean panting score ranged from r = 0.64 to 0.80. These adjustments would be most appropriate to use, within a day, to predict THI during the afternoon hours using hourly data or current conditions. In addition to afternoon conditions, nighttime conditions, including minimum WSPD, minimum black globe THI, and minimum THI, were also found to influence heat stress experienced by cattle. Although knowledge of THI alone is beneficial in determining the potential for heat stress, WSPD and RAD adjustments to the THI more accurately assess animal discomfort.

1 April 2005 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTami Brown-Brandl
Tami Brown-Brandl
RER.A. Eigenberg
R.A. Eigenberg
JNJ.A. Nienaber
J.A. Nienaber
GHG.L. Hahn
G.L. Hahn

1 December 2006 in Livestock Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTami Brown-Brandl
Tami Brown-Brandl
RER.A. Eigenberg
R.A. Eigenberg
JNJ.A. Nienaber
J.A. Nienaber

1 May 2005 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RER.A. Eigenberg
R.A. Eigenberg
TBTami Brown-Brandl
Tami Brown-Brandl
JNJ.A. Nienaber
J.A. Nienaber
GHG.L. Hahn
G.L. Hahn

29 November 2018 in Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBTami Brown-Brandl
Tami Brown-Brandl
Thermal stress is the result of a misbalance between heat produced or gained from the environment and the amount of heat lost to the environment. The level of thermal stress can range from minor or no effect to death of vulnerable animals. Under summertime conditions, thermal stress results in hyperthermia or heat stress. Heat stress in feedlot cattle is a common summertime occurrence in cattle-producing parts of the world (USA, Australia, Brazil, etc.). Effects on animals experiencing heat stress include decreases in feed intake, animal growth, and production efficiency. During these extreme events, animal losses can exceed 5% of all cattle on feed in a single feedlot. Luckily, these extreme events are generally very localized and last only a day or two. However, these losses can be devastating to individual producers within the affected area. The level of heat stress an individual animal will experience is a result of a combination of three distinct components: environmental conditions, individual animal susceptibility, and management of the herd. Environmental components include temperature, humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation. Several indices have been developed to summarize the different components into a single value. Individual animal susceptibility is influenced by many different factors including coat color, sex, temperament, previous health history, acclimation, and condition score. Finally, management greatly influences the effects of thermal stress. Management factors can be broken into four distinct categories: feed, water, environmental influences, and handling. Understanding these risk factors and how each one influences animal stress will aid in the development of management strategies and how to implement them. Management strategies that can be employed at the right time and to the correct groups of animals will increase benefits to the animals and limit costs for the producers.

1 July 2016 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLF. Lao
F. Lao
TBTami Brown-Brandl
Tami Brown-Brandl
JSJ.P. Stinn
J.P. Stinn
KLKai Liu
Kai Liu
GTG. Teng
G. Teng
HXH. Xin
H. Xin