Allergy immunotherapy targets the immunological cause of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma and has the potential to alter the natural course of allergic disease. The primary objective was to investigate the effect of the SQ grass sublingual immunotherapy tablet compared with placebo on the risk of developing asthma. A total of 812 children (5-12 years), with a clinically relevant history of grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and no medical history or signs of asthma, were included in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, comprising 3 years of treatment and 2 years of follow-up. There was no difference in time to onset of asthma, defined by prespecified asthma criteria relying on documented reversible impairment of lung function (primary endpoint). Treatment with the SQ grass sublingual immunotherapy tablet significantly reduced the risk of experiencing asthma symptoms or using asthma medication at the end of trial (odds ratio = 0.66, P < .036), during the 2-year posttreatment follow-up, and during the entire 5-year trial period. Also, grass allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms were 22% to 30% reduced (P < .005 for all 5 years). At the end of the trial, the use of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis pharmacotherapy was significantly less (27% relative difference to placebo, P < .001). Total IgE, grass pollen-specific IgE, and skin prick test reactivity to grass pollen were all reduced compared to placebo. Treatment with the SQ grass sublingual immunotherapy tablet reduced the risk of experiencing asthma symptoms and using asthma medication, and had a positive, long-term clinical effect on rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use but did not show an effect on the time to onset of asthma.

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) was first described in the 1990s, showing an increasing incidence and prevalence since then, being the leading cause of food impaction and the major cause of dysphagia. Probably, in a few years, EoE may no longer be considered a rare disease. Methods: This article discusses new aspects of the pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of EoE according to the last published guidelines. Results: The epidemiological studies indicate a multifactorial origin for EoE, where environmental and genetic factors take part. EoE affects both children and adults and it is frequently associated with atopic disease and IgE-mediated food allergies. In patients undergoing oral immunotherapy for desensitization from IgE-mediated food allergy the risk of developing EoE is 2.72%. Barrier dysfunction and T-helper 2 inflammation is considered to be pathogenetically important factors. There are different patterns of clinical presentation varying with age and can be masked by adaptation habits. Besides, symptoms do not usually correlate with histologic disease activity. The diagnostic criteria for EoE has evolved but mainly requires symptoms of esophageal dysfunction with histologic evidence of a peak value of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field. Endoscopies have to be repeated in order to diagnose, monitor, and treat EoE. Treatment of EoE can be started either by drugs (PPIs and topical corticosteroids) or elimination diets. The multistage step-up elimination diet management approach of EoE is promising. Endoscopic dilation is used for patients with severe dysphagia/food impaction with inadequate response to anti-inflammatory treatment. Conclusions: Research in recent years has contributed to a better understanding of EoE's pathogenesis, genetic background, natural history, allergy workup, standardization in assessment of disease activity, evaluation of minimally invasive diagnostic tools, and new therapeutic approaches. However, several unmet needs are to be solved urgently, as finding a non-invasive disease-monitoring methods and biomarkers for routine practice, the development or new therapies, novel food allergy testing to detect triggering foods, drug, and doses required for initial therapy and safety issues with long-term maintenance therapy, amongst others. Besides, multidisciplinary management units of EoE, involving gastroenterologists, pediatricians, allergists, pathologists, dietitians, and ENT specialists are needed.

Desensitisation or specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) to food is a new topical-therapeutic approach of food allergy for those children who have not achieved tolerance spontaneously. The objective of this study is to induce clinical tolerance in children with persistent allergy using an oral desensitisation protocol with powdered pasteurised egg. Seventy-two patients with egg allergy confirmed by open oral challenge test were randomly assigned to SOTI or elimination diet as a control group. Forty children (5-15 years) underwent a SOTI beginning with 1mg and increasing the dosage weekly until a dose of 10g, equivalent to an egg. The control group included 32 patients (4-15 years). The procedure's average duration was 10 weeks (range 4-28 weeks). Three patients were withdrawn from the protocol for persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. During SOTI, 21 children (52.5%) presented symptoms. In eight the symptoms were mild and required no treatment. In the other 13 (61.90%), the reactions were more severe. Seventeen children finished the treatment over a year ago and 20 in the past 6-12 months. Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) in the active group achieved tolerance to egg, versus 21.8% in the control group. We only found statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for skin prick tests with powdered egg at various dilutions and IgG levels with egg white after SOTI. Specific IgE concentration did not change significantly. Our SOTI protocol is a safe, effective treatment for food allergy and of reasonable duration, confirming that tolerance can be induced in children who have not achieved it spontaneously.

Background: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food hypersensitivity usually due to cow’s milk or soy. Among the solid foods, rice is one of the most causative foods worldwide, but it varies depending on the geographic area. In the Mediterranean countries, fish is one of the most important triggers of FPIES. There is not a specific biological marker for the disease that allows us to confirm the diagnosis or to predict when tolerance to the offending food has been achieved, so all patients with a FPIES diagnosis undergo an oral food challenge (OFC) at least once. The OFC is a risky procedure and many patients develop severe symptoms. Objective: We sought to evaluate the safety of a new OFC protocol in children with fish-FPIES. Methods: A retrospective study was performed over a 22-year period (1996–2018). We compared two methodologies used in the OFC: Method 1 that consisted in giving several doses during the same day versus Method 2 that consisted in giving a unique dose per day on 2 or three non-consecutive days. Results: A total of 75 positive OFC with fish done in 40 children were included. Forty-three (57.3%) OFC were performed following Method 1 and 32 (42.7%) with Method 2.The severity of the symptoms of the OFC done with Method 1 was mostly moderate (41.9%) followed by severe (39.5%) and mild (18.6%). The adverse reactions with Method 2 were mostly mild (68.8%) and only 18.8 and 12.5% presented moderate or severe symptoms, respectively. Conclusions: OFC performed in children with fish-FPIES are risky and many patients develop moderate or severe symptoms after this procedure. We propose a new protocol that has demonstrated to improve safety.