Andrew  John Hewitt

Dr. Andrew John Hewitt

School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2013 in Crop Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGary J. Dorr
Gary J. Dorr
Andrew  John HewittAndrew John Hewitt
Andrew John Hewitt
SASteve W. Adkins
Steve W. Adkins
JHJim Hanan
Jim Hanan
HZHuichun Zhang
Huichun Zhang
BNBarry Noller
Barry Noller

1 October 2015 in Crop Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
J Connor FergusonJ Connor Ferguson
J Connor Ferguson
COChris C. O'Donnell
Chris C. O'Donnell
Bhagirath ChauhanBhagirath Chauhan
Bhagirath Chauhan
SASteve W. Adkins
Steve W. Adkins
GKGreg R. Kruger
Greg R. Kruger
Andrew  John HewittAndrew John Hewitt
Andrew John Hewitt

1 January 2005 in Applied Engineering in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WHW. C. Hoffmann
W. C. Hoffmann
Andrew  John HewittAndrew John Hewitt
Andrew John Hewitt

1 September 2000 in Crop Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrew  John HewittAndrew John Hewitt
Andrew John Hewitt

11 November 2008 in Functional Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GDGary Dorr
Gary Dorr
JHJim Hanan
Jim Hanan
SASteve Adkins
Steve Adkins
Andrew  John HewittAndrew John Hewitt
Andrew John Hewitt
COChris O’dOnnell
Chris O’dOnnell
BNBarry Noller
Barry Noller
For pesticides to effectively manage pests, they must first be deposited on the target (typically a plant surface) in a manner in which the active ingredient(s) can be readily taken up by the target organism. A plant architectural model that enables the location of various plant components in 3-D space combined with a particle trajectory model has been used to study the interception of spray droplets by various vegetative elements. Results from the simulation are compared with wind tunnel studies of glyphosate deposition on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. var. Sicala), sow thistle (Sonchus oleraceus L.) and wild oats (Avena ludoviciana Durieu). An air induction flat fan nozzle (AI110015 at 500 kPa pressure) and an extended range flat fan nozzle (XR11002 at 280 kPa pressure) were predicted to have similar glyphosate deposition on cotton and sow thistle plants, whereas the extended range nozzle resulted in higher deposit on wild oats. Spray deposition (µg cm-2) on wild oat plants at the 5-leaf stage was more than double the amount of deposition on sow thistle or wild oat plants at the 2-leaf stage. The model was in good agreement with the experimental data except that it tended to over predict deposition on sow thistle plants.

22 May 2015 in Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CNChristian Nansen
Christian Nansen
J Connor FergusonJ Connor Ferguson
J Connor Ferguson
JMJohn Moore
John Moore
LGLloyd Groves
Lloyd Groves
RERob Emery
Rob Emery
Andrew  John HewittAndrew John Hewitt
Andrew John Hewitt