Drought is the meteorological phenomenon with the greatest impact on agriculture. Accordingly, drought forecasting is vital in lessening its associated negative impacts. Utilizing remote exploration in the agricultural sector allows for the collection of large amounts of quantitative data across a wide range of areas. In this study, we confirmed the applicability of drought assessment using the evaporative stress index (ESI) in major East Asian countries. The ESI is an indicator of agricultural drought that describes anomalies in actual/reference evapotranspiration (ET) ratios that are retrieved using remotely sensed inputs of land surface temperature (LST) and leaf area index (LAI). The ESI is available through SERVIR Global, a joint venture between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This study evaluated the performance of ESI in assessing drought events in South Korea. The evaluation of ESI is possible because of the availability of good statistical data. Comparing drought trends identified by ESI data from this study to actual drought conditions showed similar trends. Additionally, ESI reacted to the drought more quickly and with greater sensitivity than other drought indices. Our results confirmed that the ESI is advantageous for short and medium-term drought assessment compared to vegetation indices alone.

A flash drought is a drought that occurs rapidly within a short period of time, owing to changes in weather and environmental factors that occur rapidly due to extreme weather caused by climate change. Drought damage occurs within a relatively short period of time, and extreme vegetation stress can damage crops due to reduced water supply. Thus, different monitoring methods are required for different drought types. In this study, ESI (Evaporative Stress Index) and EDDI (Evaporative Demand Drought Index) were calculated to evaluate the short-term drought and determine the mechanism that causes flash droughts. The ESI and EDDI both indicates faster responses to the 2017 spring drought event than the SPI (Standardized Precipitation Index), confirming their sensitive drought assessment abilities. A flash drought detection standard was established based on the drought category used in USDM (United States Drought Monitor), and seven flash drought events were detected in South Korea over 5 years (2014-2018). A correlation analysis indicates that, among the hydrometeorological factors, the correlation coefficients between soil moisture/maximum temperature and flash drought occurrence exhibited strong positive (negative) correlations (0.9 and -0.9, respectively). The carbon change pattern obtained using GPP (Gross Primary Productivity) differed, exhibiting a -60% average GPP reduction rate compared to three other regions (JB, CN, and CB) where flash droughts occurred in 2018. We focus our discussion on opportunities to extend flash drought detection and mechanism determination using two drought indices that must be addressed to improve flash drought monitoring in South Korea.