Analysis of the genomes of four patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, and validation in more than 300 patients, has identified four genes — NOTCH1, MYD88, XPO1 and KLHL6 — that are recurrently mutated in the condition. Mutations in NOTCH1, MYD88 and XPO1 are thought to contribute to the clinical evolution of the disease. Evidence that NOTCH1 and MYD88 mutations are activating events highlights them as potential therapeutic targets. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), the most frequent leukaemia in adults in Western countries, is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical presentation and evolution1,2. Two major molecular subtypes can be distinguished, characterized respectively by a high or low number of somatic hypermutations in the variable region of immunoglobulin genes3,4. The molecular changes leading to the pathogenesis of the disease are still poorly understood. Here we performed whole-genome sequencing of four cases of CLL and identified 46 somatic mutations that potentially affect gene function. Further analysis of these mutations in 363 patients with CLL identified four genes that are recurrently mutated: notch 1 (NOTCH1), exportin 1 (XPO1), myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88) and kelch-like 6 (KLHL6). Mutations in MYD88 and KLHL6 are predominant in cases of CLL with mutated immunoglobulin genes, whereas NOTCH1 and XPO1 mutations are mainly detected in patients with unmutated immunoglobulins. The patterns of somatic mutation, supported by functional and clinical analyses, strongly indicate that the recurrent NOTCH1, MYD88 and XPO1 mutations are oncogenic changes that contribute to the clinical evolution of the disease. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive analysis of CLL combining whole-genome sequencing with clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes. It highlights the usefulness of this approach for the identification of clinically relevant mutations in cancer.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) gather over 80 histological entities, with even more molecular subsets, characterised by a low to very low incidence in all populations. The majority of sarcomas arise from the soft tissue (close to 75%), with ∼15% gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and 10% bone sarcomas. These ESMO–EURACAN (European Society for Medical Oncology–European Reference Network for rare adult solid cancers) Clinical Practice Guidelines cover STSs, while GISTs are covered by dedicated ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines [1]. Kaposi’s sarcoma is not considered in the present document. Extraskeletal Ewing and Ewing-like sarcoma is covered by ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines on bone sarcomas [2]. In general, the same principles for these tumours in children apply to adults. This is also the case for embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas, which are exceedingly rare in adults. On the other hand, pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma is viewed as a high-grade, adult-type STS. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is also a high-grade STS, whose clinical resemblance with osteosarcoma of bone is doubtful (prospective collection of data is encouraged to generate evidence on the therapeutic implications of such a diagnosis). Adult STS pathological subtypes occurring in adolescents should be managed the same way as in adult patients, though the same histotype might display clinical peculiarities when occurring at different ages.

PURPOSE: More than 90% of Ewing's sarcomas (ES) contain a fusion of the EWS and FLI1 genes, due to the t(11;22)(q24;q12) translocation. At the molecular level, the EWS-FLI1 rearrangements show great diversity. Specifically, many different combinations of exons from EWS and FLI1 encode in-frame fusion transcripts and result in differences in the length and composition of the chimeric protein, which functions as an oncogenic aberrant transcription factor. In the most common fusion type (type 1), EWS exon 7 is linked in frame with exon 6 of FLI1. As the fundamental pathogenetic lesion in ES, the molecular heterogeneity of these fusion transcripts may have functional and clinical significance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a clinical and pathologic analysis of 112 patients with ES in which EWS-FLI1 fusion transcripts were identified by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Adequate treatment and follow-up data were available in 99 patients treated with curative intent. Median follow-up in these 99 patients was 26 months (range, 1 to 140 months). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed that included other prognostic factors, such as age, tumor location, size, and stage. RESULTS: Among the 99 patients suitable for survival analysis, the tumors in 64 patients contained the type 1 fusion and in 35 patients contained less common fusion types. Stage at presentation was localized in 74 patients and metastatic in 25. Metastases (relative risk [RR] = 2.6; P = .008), and type 1 EWS-FLI1 fusion (RR = 0.37; P = .014) were, respectively, independent negative and positive prognostic factors for overall survival by multivariate analysis. Among 74 patients with localized tumors, the type 1 EWS-FLI1 fusion was also a significant positive predictor of overall survival (RR = 0.32; P = .034) by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: EWS-FLI1 fusion type appears to be prognostically relevant in ES, independent of tumor site, stage, and size. Further studies are needed to clarify the biologic basis of this phenomenon.

PURPOSE: Intense investigation has reshaped concepts about undifferentiated tumors occurring in young people (small round-cell tumors). Tumors associated with t(11;22)(p13;q12) and descriptively designated desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSRCT) are a distinctive, rare, poorly understood member of this family. We reviewed 109 cases of DSRCT to further characterize this entity better. METHODS: Clinical information and histology were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting were performed using standard techniques. Chimeric EWS-WT1 RNA and DNA were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and genomic translocation breakpoints mapped in a subset of cases. RESULTS: There were 90 males and 19 females from 6 to 49 years of age (mean, 22 years). A total of 103 had tumor in the abdominal cavity, four in the thoracic region, one in the posterior cranial fossa, and one in the hand. Typical histologic and immunohistochemical features were usually evident in well-sampled tumors, but variations in cellularity, stromal components, cytology, architecture, and immunoreactivity occurred. Tumor cells were usually reactive with antibodies to keratin (67 of 78 cases, 86%), epithelial membrane antigen (50 of 54, 93%), vimentin (64 of 66, 97%), desmin (70 of 78, 90%), neuron-specific enolase (60 of 74, 81%), and the EWS-WT1 chimeric protein (25 of 27, 93%); typically nonreactive for muscle common actin (one of 58, 2%), myogenin (zero of eight, 0%), and chromogranin (one of 46, 2%); and variably reactive for MIC2 (nine of 47, 20%) and p53 (five of 17 with > 20% tumor cells reactive). Functional EWS-WT1 gene fusion was evident in 25 of 26 cases with genomic breakpoints in WT1 intron 7, and EWS introns 7, 8, and 9. Prognosis in general is poor, but tumors are responsive to aggressive therapy. CONCLUSION: This large review identifies a greater degree of clinical, pathologic, and molecular variation than originally appreciated for tumors associated with t(11;22)(p13;q12). Translocation and functional fusion of the EWS and WT1 genes appears to be a consistent feature of this unique tumor.