Elisa Aracil

Dr. Elisa Aracil

Department of Economics, Universidad Pontificia Comillas ICADE, Madrid, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2021 in Finance Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAElisa Aracil
Elisa Aracil
JSJuan José Nájera Sánchez
Juan José Nájera Sánchez
FFFrancisco Javier Forcadell
Francisco Javier Forcadell

1 January 2022 in Borsa Istanbul Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAElisa Aracil
Elisa Aracil
GGGonzalo Gómez-Bengoechea
Gonzalo Gómez-Bengoechea
OMOlga Moreno-De-Tejada
Olga Moreno-De-Tejada

17 March 2020 in Business Strategy and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FFFrancisco Javier Forcadell
Francisco Javier Forcadell
EAElisa Aracil
Elisa Aracil
FUFernando Ubeda
Fernando Ubeda

22 January 2020 in Global Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FFFrancisco Javier Forcadell
Francisco Javier Forcadell
EAElisa Aracil
Elisa Aracil
FUFernando Ubeda
Fernando Ubeda

1 January 2021 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FFFrancisco Javier Forcadell
Francisco Javier Forcadell
FÚFernando Úbeda
Fernando Úbeda
EAElisa Aracil
Elisa Aracil

13 November 2022 in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FFFrancisco Javier Forcadell
Francisco Javier Forcadell
ALAntonio Lorena
Antonio Lorena
EAElisa Aracil
Elisa Aracil
Since stakeholders cannot directly observe corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts, companies attempt to back up their increasing sustainability claims by sending CSR signals. The environment in which signaling takes place influences the credibility of the signals. Among the factors that make up the signaling environment, the overall exposure of the company to different stakeholders (i.e., stakeholder scrutiny) has been neglected by the literature. Using signaling and stakeholder theories, we argue how stakeholder scrutiny shapes CSR signals' credibility. We empirically analyze a sample of 5762 firms across several sectors from 23 developed countries from 2013 to 2017. Stakeholder scrutiny exercises a positive effect on the credibility of CSR signals through a mediated‐moderated impact of CSR (across environmental, social, and governance dimensions) on firm performance.