Zhengyang Yang

Dr. Zhengyang Yang

Department of general surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhengyang YangZhengyang Yang
Zhengyang Yang
JWJiafeng Wang
Jiafeng Wang
SLSong Liu
Song Liu
XLXianghui Li
Xianghui Li
LMLeiying Miao
Leiying Miao
WGWenxian GUAN
Wenxian GUAN

28 January 2022 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhengyang YangZhengyang Yang
Zhengyang Yang
HCHuanhuan Chen
Huanhuan Chen
PYPeizheng Yang
Peizheng Yang
XSXiaofei Shen
Xiaofei Shen
YHYiqiao Hu
Yiqiao Hu
ZZZhongtao Zhang
Zhongtao Zhang

1 July 2024 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WFWentao Fu
Wentao Fu
SSShengbo Sun
Shengbo Sun
YCYuhao Cheng
Yuhao Cheng
JMJingxin Ma
Jingxin Ma
YHYiqiao Hu
Yiqiao Hu
ZZZhongtao Zhang
Zhongtao Zhang

1 January 2019 in Theranostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Zhengyang YangZhengyang Yang
Zhengyang Yang
JWJiafeng Wang
Jiafeng Wang
SAShichao Ai
Shichao Ai
Jianfei SunJianfei Sun
Jianfei Sun
XMXiaoli Mai
Xiaoli Mai
WGWenxian Guan
Wenxian Guan
Tumor hypoxia is an important reason for the limited therapeutic efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) because of the oxygen requirement of the therapeutic process. PDT consumes tissue oxygen and destroys tumor vasculature, further hampering its own efficacy in promoting tumor deterioration. Therefore, overcoming the photodynamic exacerbation of tumor hypoxia is urgent.

2 September 2025 in Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShengbo Sun
Shengbo Sun
LLLanchun Liu
Lanchun Liu
JZJingkang Zhang
Jingkang Zhang
LSLiting Sun
Liting Sun
WSWenlong Shu
Wenlong Shu
ZZZhongtao Zhang
Zhongtao Zhang
Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized oncology by leveraging the immune system to combat tumors. Among various biomarkers, neoantigens and tumor mutational burden (TMB) have emerged as critical factors in tailoring personalized treatments. Neoantigens are tumor-specific peptides displayed on cancer cell surfaces, derived from somatic mutations. Recognized as "non-self" by the immune system, they trigger T-cell responses and enable therapies like personalized vaccines and adoptive T-cell transfer. Critically, neoantigen potential correlates with TMB, which quantifies the total somatic mutations within a tumor genome. A higher TMB generally correlates with a greater likelihood of generating immunogenic neoantigens, making it a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Progress in high-throughput sequencing, bioinformatics, and immuno-peptidomics has significantly enhanced the accuracy of neoantigen prediction, including assessments of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding affinity and T-cell receptor recognition. Clinically, neoantigen-based therapies have shown efficacy in early trials, with strategies such as mRNA vaccines demonstrating synergy with ICI by boosting T-cell activation and overcoming immune suppression. Combining neoantigen-based therapies with chemotherapy and radiotherapy harnesses synergistic mechanisms to enhance efficacy, overcome resistance, and emerge as a pivotal oncology research focus. The integration of TMB into clinical practice has received regulatory approval as a biomarker for stratifying patients for ICI therapies. Furthermore, advanced methodologies like liquid biopsy and single-cell technologies have streamlined TMB measurement, improving its predictive value for personalized immunotherapy. Collectively, neoantigens and TMB have optimized the evolution of precision immuno-oncology by providing frameworks that maximize therapeutic efficacy, overcome resistance mechanisms, and advance durable cancer remission.​

14 August 2019 in BMC Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zhengyang YangZhengyang Yang
Zhengyang Yang
FSFeng Sun
Feng Sun
SAShichao Ai
Shichao Ai
JWJiafeng Wang
Jiafeng Wang
WGWenxian GUAN
Wenxian GUAN
SLSong Liu
Song Liu
Appendectomy is considered the first treatment choice for appendicitis. However, controversy exists since conservative therapy is associated with fewer complications than appendectomy for patients with acute appendicitis (AA). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes between conservative therapy and appendectomy in the management of adult AA. A literature search was performed to screen eligible clinical studies. Subgroup analyses of the uncomplicated population, complicated population and mixed population of randomized clinical trials were subsequently performed. Clinical outcomes included the overall effective rate of treatment, complication rate, relapse rate (reoperation rate) and overall length of stay (LOS). Eleven trials totalling 2751 patients (conservative = 1463, appendectomy = 1288) were analysed. Patients receiving conservative treatment had a lower overall effective rate (OR: 0.11 ~ 0.17) and complication rate (OR: 0.21 ~ 0.51). The conservative group had a higher reoperation rate (5.6, 95% CI: 3.1% ~ 10.2%) than the appendectomy group (OR: 9.58 ~ 14.29). Conservative treatment was associated with a shorter overall length of stay (0.47 day, 95% CI: 0.45 ~ 0.5 day) than appendectomy. For both uncomplicated and complicated adult AA, non-operative management with antibiotics was associated with significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of stay but a lower effective rate and higher relapse rate.