Allan Pau

Dr. Allan Pau


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 January 2019 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJulia Yen Yee Pan
Julia Yen Yee Pan
APAbhishek Parolia
Abhishek Parolia
SCSiong Ren Chuah
Siong Ren Chuah
SBShekhar Bhatia
Shekhar Bhatia
SMSunil Mutalik
Sunil Mutalik
APAllan Pau
Allan Pau
To determine the root canal morphology of human permanent maxillary and mandibular teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). A total of 208 CBCT images were examined retrospectively. Prevalence of an extra root/canal and internal morphology based on Vertucci’s classification were observed in human maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth. Variations in the external and internal morphology were compared in relation to gender and tooth side (left vs right) using Pearson Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests with significance level set at p < 0.05. In the maxillary arch, the prevalence of three canals were observed in 0.3% of first premolars and two canals in 46.5% of second premolars. Males displayed significantly higher prevalence of two canals in maxillary second premolars than females (p < 0.05). The prevalence of a second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first and second molars were 36.3 and 8.5%, respectively. Males displayed significantly higher prevalence of a second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary second molars than females (p < 0.05). The prevalence of a second palatal canal in maxillary first and second molars were 0.9 and 0.6%, respectively. In the mandibular arch, the prevalence of two canals were observed in 5.1% of central incisors, 12.3% of lateral incisors, 6.1% of canines, 18.7% of first premolars and 0.5% of second premolars. The prevalence of a middle mesial canal, second distal canal and extra root (radix entomolaris) were detected in 1.9, 19.5 and 21.4% of mandibular first molars, respectively. The prevalence of a C-shaped canal was observed in 48.7% of mandibular second molars. Females displayed significantly higher prevalence of a C-shaped canal in the right mandibular second molars than males (p < 0.05). No other statistically significant differences in root anatomy and root canal morphology were observed in relation to gender and tooth side. Wide variations in the root canal morphology exist among Malaysians. CBCT is a clinically useful tool in the identification of external and internal morphological variations in the human teeth.

25 August 2015 in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJAnn Jacob
Ann Jacob
APAbhishek Parolia
Abhishek Parolia
APAllan Pau
Allan Pau
FDFabian Davamani
Fabian Davamani
To evaluate and compare the effects of ethanolic extracts of Malaysian propolis and Brazilian red propolis at different concentrations on the migration and proliferation of fibroblast cells. Malaysian and Brazilian red propolis crude samples were extracted using ethanol. Their wound healing effects were tested in vitro on the normal human fibroblast cell line CRL-7522. Cell migration and proliferation assays were carried out using propolis concentrations of 1, 10, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05). Malaysian and Brazilian red propolis followed a concentration-dependent increasing and decreasing trend. Malaysian propolis showed the fastest migration rate at 250 μg/mL which was statistically significant (p < 0.05) and maximum proliferation at 500 μg/mL with no significant difference (p > 0.05) compared to control. Brazilian red propolis showed a slight increase in migration and proliferation at 10 and 100 μg/mL, respectively with no significant difference (p > 0.05) compared to control, while concentrations above these conferred inhibitory effects. Malaysian and Brazilian red propolis show potential to assist in wound healing, depending on their concentration.

30 January 2021 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAbhishek Parolia
Abhishek Parolia
HKHaresh Kumar Kantilal
Haresh Kumar Kantilal
SRSrinivasan Ramamurthy
Srinivasan Ramamurthy
TMThiagarajan Madheswaran
Thiagarajan Madheswaran
FDFabian Davamani
Fabian Davamani
APAllan Pau
Allan Pau
To determine the antibacterial effect of propolis nanoparticles (PNs) as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm inside the endodontic root canal system. Two-hundred-ten extracted human teeth were sectioned to obtain 6 mm of the middle third of the root. The root canal was enlarged to an internal diameter of 0.9 mm. The specimens were inoculated with E. faecalis for 21 days. Following this, specimens were randomly divided into seven groups, with 30 dentinal blocks in each group including: group I—saline; group II—propolis 100 µg/mL; group III—propolis 300 µg/mL; group IV—propolis nanoparticle 100 µg/mL; group V—propolis nanoparticle 300µg/mL; group VI—6% sodium hypochlorite; group VII—2% chlorhexidine. Dentin shavings were collected at 200 and 400 μm depths, and total numbers of CFUs were determined at the end of one, five, and ten minutes. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare the differences in reduction in CFUs between all groups, and probability values of p < 0.05 were set as the reference for statistically significant results. The antibacterial effect of PNs as an endodontic irrigant was also assessed against E. faecalis isolates from patients with failed root canal treatment. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were also performed after exposure to PNs. A Raman spectroscope, equipped with a Leica microscope and lenses with curve-fitting Raman software, was used for analysis. The molecular interactions between bioactive compounds of propolis (Pinocembrin, Kaempferol, and Quercetin) and the proteins Sortase A and β-galactosidase were also understood by computational molecular docking studies. PN300 was significantly more effective in reducing CFUs compared to all other groups (p < 0.05) except 6% NaOCl and 2% CHX (p > 0.05) at all time intervals and both depths. At five minutes, 6% NaOCl and 2% CHX were the most effective in reducing CFUs (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between PN300, 6% NaOCl, and 2% CHX at 10 min (p > 0.05). SEM images also showed the maximum reduction in E. faecalis with PN300, 6% NaOCl, and 2% CHX at five and ten minutes. CLSM images showed the number of dead cells in dentin were highest with PN300 compared to PN100 and saline. There was a reduction in the 484 cm−1 band and an increase in the 870 cm−1 band in the PN300 group. The detailed observations of the docking poses of bioactive compounds and their interactions with key residues of the binding site in all the three docking protocols revealed that the interactions were consistent with reasonable docking and IFD docking scores. PN300 was equally as effective as 6% NaOCl and 2% CHX in reducing the E. faecalis biofilms.

13 May 2014 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEu Gene Chua
Eu Gene Chua
APAbhishek Parolia
Abhishek Parolia
PAPriya Ahlawat
Priya Ahlawat
APAllan Pau
Allan Pau
FDFabian Davamani
Fabian Davamani
To investigate the antifungal activity of propolis, triple antibiotic paste (TAP), 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide with propylene glycol on Candida albicans-infected root canal dentinal tubules at two different depths (200 μm and 400 μm) and two time intervals (day 1 and 7).

1 September 2020 in Journal of Oral Biosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJun Ai Chong
Jun Ai Chong
AMAlizae Marny Fadzlin Syed Mohamed
Alizae Marny Fadzlin Syed Mohamed
APAllan Pau
Allan Pau

1 January 2016 in Medical Education Online
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAllan Pau
Allan Pau
YCYu Sui Chen
Yu Sui Chen
VLVerna Kar Mun Lee
Verna Kar Mun Lee
CSChew Fei Sow
Chew Fei Sow
RARanjit De Alwis
Ranjit De Alwis
What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?