Josh Gray

Dr. Josh Gray


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2014 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TKTrevor F. Keenan
Trevor F. Keenan
JGJosh Gray
Josh Gray
MFMark A. Friedl
Mark A. Friedl
MTMichael Toomey
Michael Toomey
GBGil Bohrer
Gil Bohrer
ARAndrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson

1 March 2019 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDamien Sulla-Menashe
Damien Sulla-Menashe
JGJosh Gray
Josh Gray
SAS. Parker Abercrombie
S. Parker Abercrombie
MFMark A. Friedl
Mark A. Friedl

13 March 2018 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAndrew Richardson
Andrew Richardson
Koen  HufkensKoen Hufkens
Koen Hufkens
TMTom Milliman
Tom Milliman
DADonald M. Aubrecht
Donald M. Aubrecht
MCMin Chen
Min Chen
SFSteve Frolking
Steve Frolking
Vegetation phenology controls the seasonality of many ecosystem processes, as well as numerous biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks. Phenology is also highly sensitive to climate change and variability. Here we present a series of datasets, together consisting of almost 750 years of observations, characterizing vegetation phenology in diverse ecosystems across North America. Our data are derived from conventional, visible-wavelength, automated digital camera imagery collected through the PhenoCam network. For each archived image, we extracted RGB (red, green, blue) colour channel information, with means and other statistics calculated across a region-of-interest (ROI) delineating a specific vegetation type. From the high-frequency (typically, 30 min) imagery, we derived time series characterizing vegetation colour, including “canopy greenness”, processed to 1- and 3-day intervals. For ecosystems with one or more annual cycles of vegetation activity, we provide estimates, with uncertainties, for the start of the “greenness rising” and end of the “greenness falling” stages. The database can be used for phenological model validation and development, evaluation of satellite remote sensing data products, benchmarking earth system models, and studies of climate change impacts on terrestrial ecosystems.

1 April 2020 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDouglas K. Bolton
Douglas K. Bolton
JGJosh Gray
Josh Gray
EMEli K. Melaas
Eli K. Melaas
MMMinkyu Moon
Minkyu Moon
LELars Eklundh
Lars Eklundh
MFMark A. Friedl
Mark A. Friedl

19 August 2014 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKStephen Klosterman
Stephen Klosterman
Koen  HufkensKoen Hufkens
Koen Hufkens
JGJosh Gray
Josh Gray
EME. Melaas
E. Melaas
OSO. Sonnentag
O. Sonnentag
ARAndrew Richardson
Andrew Richardson
Plant phenology regulates ecosystem services at local and global scales and is a sensitive indicator of global change. Estimates of phenophase transition dates, such as the start of spring or end of fall, can be derived from sensor-based time series, but must be interpreted in terms of biologically relevant events. We use the PhenoCam archive of digital repeat photography to implement a consistent protocol for visual assessment of canopy phenology at 13 temperate deciduous forest sites throughout eastern North America, and to perform digital image analysis for time-series-based estimation of phenophase transition dates. We then compare these results to remote sensing metrics of phenophase transition dates derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors. We present a new type of curve fit that uses a generalized sigmoid function to estimate phenology dates, and we quantify the statistical uncertainty of phenophase transition dates estimated using this method. Results show that the generalized sigmoid provides estimates of dates with less statistical uncertainty than other curve-fitting methods. Additionally, we find that dates derived from analysis of high-frequency PhenoCam imagery have smaller uncertainties than satellite remote sensing metrics of phenology, and that dates derived from the remotely sensed enhanced vegetation index (EVI) have smaller uncertainty than those derived from the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Near-surface time-series estimates for the start of spring are found to closely match estimates derived from visual assessment of leaf-out, as well as satellite remote-sensing-derived estimates of the start of spring. However late spring and fall phenology metrics exhibit larger differences between near-surface and remote scales. Differences in late spring phenology between near-surface and remote scales are found to correlate with a landscape metric of deciduous forest cover. These results quantify the effect of landscape heterogeneity when aggregating to the coarser spatial scales of remote sensing, and demonstrate the importance of accurate curve fitting and vegetation index selection when analyzing and interpreting phenology time series.

1 March 2017 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXiaoyang Zhang
Xiaoyang Zhang
JWJianmin Wang
Jianmin Wang
Feng GaoFeng Gao
Feng Gao
YLYan Liu
Yan Liu
CSCrystal B. Schaaf
Crystal B. Schaaf
Geoffrey HenebryGeoffrey Henebry
Geoffrey Henebry