Leonardo Alfonso

Dr. Leonardo Alfonso


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2018 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHans Jørgen Henriksen
Hans Jørgen Henriksen
MRMatthew J. Roberts
Matthew J. Roberts
Peter Van der KeurPeter Van der Keur
Peter Van der Keur
AHAtte Harjanne
Atte Harjanne
DEDavid Egilson
David Egilson
LALeonardo Alfonso
Leonardo Alfonso

30 December 2010 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALeonardo Alfonso
Leonardo Alfonso
ALArnold Lobbrecht
Arnold Lobbrecht
RPRoland Price
Roland Price

28 June 2017 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJuan C. Chacon-Hurtado
Juan C. Chacon-Hurtado
LALeonardo Alfonso
Leonardo Alfonso
Dimitri P. SolomatineDimitri P. Solomatine
Dimitri P. Solomatine
Sensors and sensor networks play an important role in decision-making related to water quality, operational streamflow forecasting, flood early warning systems, and other areas. In this paper we review a number of existing applications and analyse a variety of evaluation and design procedures for sensor networks with respect to various criteria. Most of the existing approaches focus on maximising the observability and information content of a variable of interest. From the context of hydrological modelling only a few studies use the performance of the hydrological simulation in terms of output discharge as a design criterion. In addition to the review, we propose a framework for classifying the existing design methods, and a generalised procedure for an optimal network design in the context of rainfall–runoff hydrological modelling.

20 January 2016 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALeonardo Alfonso
Leonardo Alfonso
MMM. M. Mukolwe
M. M. Mukolwe
GBG. Di Baldassarre
G. Di Baldassarre
Floods are one of the most frequent and disruptive natural hazards that affect man. Annually, significant flood damage is documented worldwide. Flood mapping is a common preimpact flood hazard mitigation measure, for which advanced methods and tools (such as flood inundation models) are used to estimate potential flood extent maps that are used in spatial planning. However, these tools are affected, largely to an unknown degree, by both epistemic and aleatory uncertainty. Over the past few years, advances in uncertainty analysis with respect to flood inundation modeling show that it is appropriate to adopt Probabilistic Flood Maps (PFM) to account for uncertainty. However, the following question arises; how can probabilistic flood hazard information be incorporated into spatial planning? Thus, a consistent framework to incorporate PFMs into the decision‐making is required. In this paper, a novel methodology based on Decision‐Making under Uncertainty theories, in particular Value of Information (VOI) is proposed. Specifically, the methodology entails the use of a PFM to generate a VOI map, which highlights floodplain locations where additional information is valuable with respect to available floodplain management actions and their potential consequences. The methodology is illustrated with a simplified example and also applied to a real case study in the South of France, where a VOI map is analyzed on the basis of historical land use change decisions over a period of 26 years. Results show that uncertain flood hazard information encapsulated in PFMs can aid decision‐making in floodplain planning.

14 February 2017 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maurizio MazzoleniMaurizio Mazzoleni
Maurizio Mazzoleni
MVMartin Verlaan
Martin Verlaan
LALeonardo Alfonso
Leonardo Alfonso
MMMartina Monego
Martina Monego
DNDaniele Norbiato
Daniele Norbiato
Dimitri P. SolomatineDimitri P. Solomatine
Dimitri P. Solomatine
Monitoring stations have been used for decades to properly measure hydrological variables and better predict floods. To this end, methods to incorporate these observations into mathematical water models have also been developed. Besides, in recent years, the continued technological advances, in combination with the growing inclusion of citizens in participatory processes related to water resources management, have encouraged the increase of citizen science projects around the globe. In turn, this has stimulated the spread of low-cost sensors to allow citizens to participate in the collection of hydrological data in a more distributed way than the classic static physical sensors do. However, two main disadvantages of such crowdsourced data are the irregular availability and variable accuracy from sensor to sensor, which makes them challenging to use in hydrological modelling. This study aims to demonstrate that streamflow data, derived from crowdsourced water level observations, can improve flood prediction if integrated in hydrological models. Two different hydrological models, applied to four case studies, are considered. Realistic (albeit synthetic) time series are used to represent crowdsourced data in all case studies. In this study, it is found that the data accuracies have much more influence on the model results than the irregular frequencies of data availability at which the streamflow data are assimilated. This study demonstrates that data collected by citizens, characterized by being asynchronous and inaccurate, can still complement traditional networks formed by few accurate, static sensors and improve the accuracy of flood forecasts.

23 March 2010 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALeonardo Alfonso
Leonardo Alfonso
ALArnold Lobbrecht
Arnold Lobbrecht
RPRoland Price
Roland Price