Cecilia Tamborindeguy

Dr. Cecilia Tamborindeguy

Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2012 in Molecular Genetics and Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PNPunya Nachappa
Punya Nachappa
Julien LevyJulien Levy
Julien Levy
CTCecilia Tamborindeguy
Cecilia Tamborindeguy

1 January 2012 in Phytopathology®
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PNPunya Nachappa
Punya Nachappa
ASAna Austin Shapiro
Ana Austin Shapiro
CTCecilia Tamborindeguy
Cecilia Tamborindeguy
The potato/tomato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli transmits the bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’, also known as ‘Ca. L. psyllaurous’, which causes zebra chip disease in solanaceous crops. There have been no studies addressing the effect of the bacterial plant pathogen on the biology of its insect vector. We examined several life-history traits, including 7-day fecundity, hatching percentage, incubation time, nymphal survival percentage, nymphal development time, total development time, and sex-ratio of ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’-positive and -negative psyllid isofemale lines on tomato, as well as adult mortality index of ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’-positive and -negative insects. The only two life-history traits that differed between the ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’-positive and –negative psyllid isofemale lines were 7-day fecundity and nymphal survival percentage, which were significantly lower in ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’- positive lines. The symbiotic bacteria associated with both psyllid isofemale lines were similar, with the exception of ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’, which showed 100% infection in the ‘Ca. L. solanacearum’-positive lines and was not detected in the negative psyllid lines. These results suggest that ‘Ca. L. solanacearum' has a negative effect on population growth rate of its insect vector on tomato.

16 February 2011 in Current Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PNPunya Nachappa
Punya Nachappa
Julien LevyJulien Levy
Julien Levy
EPElizabeth Pierson
Elizabeth Pierson
CTCecilia Tamborindeguy
Cecilia Tamborindeguy

1 January 2014 in Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PNPunya Nachappa
Punya Nachappa
Julien LevyJulien Levy
Julien Levy
EPElizabeth Pierson
Elizabeth Pierson
CTCecilia Tamborindeguy
Cecilia Tamborindeguy

9 August 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTCecilia Tamborindeguy
Cecilia Tamborindeguy
MBMichael S. Bereman
Michael S. Bereman
SBStacy De Blasio
Stacy De Blasio
DIDavid Igwe
David Igwe
DSDawn M. Smith
Dawn M. Smith
MCMichelle Cilia
Michelle Cilia
Yellow dwarf viruses cause the most economically important virus diseases of cereal crops worldwide and are transmitted by aphid vectors. The identification of aphid genes and proteins mediating virus transmission is critical to develop agriculturally sustainable virus management practices and to understand viral strategies for circulative movement in all insect vectors. Two cyclophilin B proteins, S28 and S29, were identified previously in populations of Schizaphis graminum that differed in their ability to transmit the RPV strain of Cereal yellow dwarf virus (CYDV-RPV). The presence of S29 was correlated with F2 genotypes that were efficient virus transmitters. The present study revealed the two proteins were isoforms, and a single amino acid change distinguished S28 and S29. The distribution of the two alleles was determined in 12 F2 genotypes segregating for CYDV-RPV transmission capacity and in 11 genetically independent, field-collected S. graminum biotypes. Transmission efficiency for CYDV-RPV was determined in all genotypes and biotypes. The S29 isoform was present in all genotypes or biotypes that efficiently transmit CYDV-RPV and more specifically in genotypes that efficiently transport virus across the hindgut. We confirmed a direct interaction between CYDV-RPV and both S28 and S29 using purified virus and bacterially expressed, his-tagged S28 and S29 proteins. Importantly, S29 failed to interact with a closely related virus that is transported across the aphid midgut. We tested for in vivo interactions using an aphid-virus co-immunoprecipitation strategy coupled with a bottom-up LC-MS/MS analysis using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer. This analysis enabled us to identify a third cyclophilin protein, cyclophilin A, interacting directly or in complex with purified CYDV-RPV. Taken together, these data provide evidence that both cyclophilin A and B interact with CYDV-RPV, and these interactions may be important but not sufficient to mediate virus transport from the hindgut lumen into the hemocoel.

9 June 2016 in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJianxiu Yao
Jianxiu Yao
PSPanatda Saenkham
Panatda Saenkham
Julien LevyJulien Levy
Julien Levy
FIFreddy Ibanez
Freddy Ibanez
CNChristophe Noroy
Christophe Noroy
CTCecilia Tamborindeguy
Cecilia Tamborindeguy
‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (Lso) has emerged as a serious threat world-wide. Five Lso haplotypes have been identified so far. Haplotypes A and B are present in the Americas and/or New Zealand, where they are vectored to solanaceous plants by the potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc) (Hemiptera: Triozidae). The fastidious nature of these pathogens has hindered the study of the interactions with their eukaryotic hosts (vector and plant). To understand the strategies used by these pathogens to infect their vector, the effects of each Lso haplotype (A or B) on psyllid fitness was investigated, and genome-wide transcriptomic and RT-qPCR analyses were performed to evaluate Lso gene expression in association with its vector. Results showed that psyllids infected with haplotype B had significantly lower percentage of nymphal survival compared to psyllids infected with haplotype A. Although overall gene expression across Lso genome was similar between the two Lso haplotypes, differences in the expression of key candidate genes were found. Among the 16 putative type IV effector genes tested, four of them were differentially expressed between Lso haplotypes, while no differences in gene expression were measured by qPCR or transcriptomic analysis for the rest of the genes. This study provides new information regarding the pathogenesis of Lso haplotypes in their insect vector.