Drug resistance is an obstacle to the treatment of ovarian cancer. Using a unique cell model, we have proven previously that a subpopulation of ovarian cancer cells is more resistant to cisplatin than are the original cells. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small noncoding RNAs, are involved in many biological events in cancer cells. In our study, we explored whether miRNAs are involved in cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer cells. Cisplatin‐resistant cells expressed a lower level of miR‐29a/b/c. Manipulation of microRNA‐29 (miR‐29) expression modulated cisplatin sensitivity of CP70, HeyC2, SKOV3 and A2780 ovarian cancer cells. Knockdown of miR‐29a/b/c increased the ability of cells to escape cisplatin‐induced cell death partly through upregulation of collagen type I alpha 1 (COL1A1) and increased the activation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1/2 and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta. When combined with cisplatin treatment, knockdown of miR‐29 decreased the amount of the active form of caspase‐9 and caspase‐3. Ectopic expression of miR‐29 alone or in combination with cisplatin treatment efficaciously reduced the tumorigenicity of CP70 cells in vivo. Our data show that downregulation of miR‐29 increases cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Taken together, these data suggest that overexpression of miR‐29 is a potential sensitizer to cisplatin treatment that may have therapeutic implications.
Oncogenic activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is common in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our recent studies have demonstrated that SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 1 (SOX1) and secreted frizzled-related proteins are concomitantly promoter-hypermethylated, and this might lead to abnormal activation of the Wnt signaling pathway in HCC. SOX1 encodes a transcription factor involved in the regulation of embryonic development and cell fate determination. However, the expression and functional role of SOX1 in HCC remains unclear. In this study, we confirmed via quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction that SOX1 was frequently downregulated through promoter hypermethylation in HCC cells and tissues. Overexpression of SOX1 by a constitutive or inducible approach could suppress cell proliferation, colony formation, and invasion ability in HCC cell lines, as well as tumor growth in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mice. Conversely, knockdown of SOX1 by withdrawal of doxycycline could partially restore cell proliferation and colony formation in HCC cells. We used a T cell factor (TCF)-responsive luciferase reporter assay and western blot analysis to prove that SOX1 could regulate TCF-responsive transcriptional activity and inhibit the expression of Wnt downstream genes. Furthermore, we used glutathione S-transferase pull-down, co-immunoprecipitation, and confocal microscopy to demonstrate that SOX1 could interact with β-catenin but not with the β-catenin/TCF complex. Moreover, restoration of the expression of SOX1 induces significant cellular senescence in Hep3B cells. Conclusion: Our data show that a developmental gene, SOX1, may function as a tumor suppressor by interfering with Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the development of HCC. (HEPATOLOGY 2012;56:2142–2153)
Oncogenic activation of the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway is common in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The secreted frizzled‐related proteins (SFRPs) function as negative regulators of Wnt signaling and have important implications for carcinogenesis. Promoter hypermethylation of SFRP genes is common in human cancers. However, the role of SFRPs in HCC is not clear. Recently, we have shown that SFRP1 is frequently downregulated through promoter hypermethylation. To confirm and extend these findings, the methylation status of the other SFRP members, including SFRP2, SFRP4 and SFRP5, was examined by methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction (MS‐PCR). Hypermethylation of SFRP genes, except for SFRP4, is frequent in HCCs and the levels found here were significantly higher than those seen in cirrhotic livers, chronic hepatitis livers and normal controls (p < 0.0001 for SFRP1 and SFRP2, p < 0.05 for SFRP5). To investigate the role of SFRP1 in HCCs, we used re‐expression of SFRP1 in β‐catenin‐dependent HCC cell lines: Huh6 and HepG2. Restoration of SFRP1 attenuated Wnt signaling in those Huh6 hepatoma cells with a β‐catenin gene point mutation, decreased abnormal accumulation of β‐catenin in the nucleus and suppressed cell growth. Conversely, restoration of SFRP1 in HepG2 hepatoma cells with truncated β‐catenin could not block the Wnt signaling pathway. Furthermore, knocking down SFRP1 by RNA interference in β‐catenin‐deficient cell lines (SK‐Hep1) stimulated Wnt signaling and promoted cell growth. Our data suggested that SFRP1 suppressed liver cancer cells growth through Wnt canonical signaling. Moreover, β‐catenin‐independent noncanonical pathway might be involved in Wnt signaling activation through unknown molecules in HCC.