Andrew Bradbury

Dr. Andrew Bradbury

NMC Biological Laboratory, 100 Entrada Drive, Los Alamos, NM 87544, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 February 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndrew Bradbury
Andrew Bradbury
APAndreas Plückthun
Andreas Plückthun

9 March 2011 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndrew Bradbury
Andrew Bradbury
SSSachdev Sidhu
Sachdev Sidhu
SDStefan Dübel
Stefan Dübel
JMJohn McCafferty
John McCafferty
In vitro display technologies, best exemplified by phage and yeast display, were first described for the selection of antibodies some 20 years ago. Since then, many antibodies have been selected and improved upon using these methods. Although it is not widely recognized, many of the antibodies derived using in vitro display methods have properties that would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to obtain by immunizing animals. The first antibodies derived using in vitro display methods are now in the clinic, with many more waiting in the wings. Unlike immunization, in vitro display permits the use of defined selection conditions and provides immediate availability of the sequence encoding the antibody. The amenability of in vitro display to high-throughput applications broadens the prospects for their wider use in basic and applied research.

1 July 2004 in Journal of Immunological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndrew Bradbury
Andrew Bradbury
JMJames D Marks
James D Marks

1 January 2007 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMichael J Taussig
Michael J Taussig
OSOda Stoevesandt
Oda Stoevesandt
CBCarl A K Borrebaeck
Carl A K Borrebaeck
ABAndrew Bradbury
Andrew Bradbury
DCDolores Cahill
Dolores Cahill
MUMathias Uhlen
Mathias Uhlen

1 October 2016 in Journal of Controlled Release
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VYVirginia J. Yao
Virginia J. Yao
SDSara D'ANgelo
Sara D'ANgelo
KBKimberly S. Butler
Kimberly S. Butler
CTChristophe Theron
Christophe Theron
TSTracey L. Smith
Tracey L. Smith
RPRenata Pasqualini
Renata Pasqualini
Nanomedicines have significant potential for cancer treatment. Although the majority of nanomedicines currently tested in clinical trials utilize simple, biocompatible liposome-based nanocarriers, their widespread use is limited by non-specificity and low target site concentration and thus, do not provide a substantial clinical advantage over conventional, systemic chemotherapy. In the past 20years, we have identified specific receptors expressed on the surfaces of tumor endothelial and perivascular cells, tumor cells, the extracellular matrix and stromal cells using combinatorial peptide libraries displayed on bacteriophage. These studies corroborate the notion that unique receptor proteins such as IL-11Rα, GRP78, EphA5, among others, are differentially overexpressed in tumors and present opportunities to deliver tumor-specific therapeutic drugs. By using peptides that bind to tumor-specific cell-surface receptors, therapeutic agents such as apoptotic peptides, suicide genes, imaging dyes or chemotherapeutics can be precisely and systemically delivered to reduce tumor growth in vivo, without harming healthy cells. Given the clinical applicability of peptide-based therapeutics, targeted delivery of nanocarriers loaded with therapeutic cargos seems plausible. We propose a modular design of a functionalized protocell in which a tumor-targeting moiety, such as a peptide or recombinant human antibody single chain variable fragment (scFv), is conjugated to a lipid bilayer surrounding a silica-based nanocarrier core containing a protected therapeutic cargo. The functionalized protocell can be tailored to a specific cancer subtype and treatment regimen by exchanging the tumor-targeting moiety and/or therapeutic cargo or used in combination to create unique, theranostic agents. In this review, we summarize the identification of tumor-specific receptors through combinatorial phage display technology and the use of antibody display selection to identify recombinant human scFvs against these tumor-specific receptors. We compare the characteristics of different types of simple and complex nanocarriers, and discuss potential types of therapeutic cargos and conjugation strategies. The modular design of functionalized protocells may improve the efficacy and safety of nanomedicines for future cancer therapy.

12 October 2020 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAlison Gray
Alison Gray
ABAndrew Bradbury
Andrew Bradbury
AKAchim Knappik
Achim Knappik
APAndreas Plückthun
Andreas Plückthun
CBCarl Borrebaeck
Carl Borrebaeck
SDStefan Dübel
Stefan Dübel