Chul-Jin Lee

Prof. Chul-Jin Lee

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HGHye-Ri Gye
Hye-Ri Gye
SSSeung-Kwon Seo
Seung-Kwon Seo
QBQuang-Vu Bach
Quang-Vu Bach
DHDaeguen Ha
Daeguen Ha
CLChul-Jin Lee
Chul-Jin Lee

1 March 2020 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSeung-Kwon Seo
Seung-Kwon Seo
DYDong-Yeol Yun
Dong-Yeol Yun
CLChul-Jin Lee
Chul-Jin Lee

1 December 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JYJae-Hyeon Yang
Jae-Hyeon Yang
YYYounggak Yoon
Younggak Yoon
MRMincheol Ryu
Mincheol Ryu
SASu-Kyung An
Su-Kyung An
JSJisup Shin
Jisup Shin
CLChul-Jin Lee
Chul-Jin Lee

27 December 2023 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDong-Hyun Kang
Dong-Hyun Kang
JAJi-Hong An
Ji-Hong An
CLChul-Jin Lee
Chul-Jin Lee

1 May 2019 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QBQuang-Vu Bach
Quang-Vu Bach
HGHye-Ri Gye
Hye-Ri Gye
DSDaesung Song
Daesung Song
CLChul-Jin Lee
Chul-Jin Lee

4 December 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSiddig Khalafalla
Siddig Khalafalla
Umer ZahidUmer Zahid
Umer Zahid
Abdul Gani Abdul JameelAbdul Gani Abdul Jameel
Abdul Gani Abdul Jameel
Ahmed UsamaAhmed Usama
Ahmed Usama
FAFeraih S. Alenazey
Feraih S. Alenazey
CLChul-Jin Lee
Chul-Jin Lee
Methanol is a clean fuel and an important feedstock for the petrochemical industry. Conventionally, the coal-to-methanol process generates a substantial amount of CO2 emissions with a low yield of methanol. In this study, we propose the conceptual design development of coal-to-methanol process using captured CO2 from the gasification plant by implying process intensification. The base case and three alternative designs have been developed using the Aspen Plus to analyze the process performance. The four designs have been compared in terms of their energy consumption, economics, methanol production rate, and carbon emissions while maintaining the gasifier operation conditions, sulfur content in the syngas, and stoichiometric number at the methanol synthesis reactor. Among the developed designs, the most feasible design requires an energy requirement and product cost of 21.9 GJ and $142.5 per ton of methanol product. The study also showed that the coal-to-methanol process assisted with external hydrogen from electrolysis plant for achieving higher production rates and low CO2 emissions is currently not economical due to the high H2 cost.