Marlies S. Wijsenbeek

Dr. Marlies S. Wijsenbeek

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2022 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GRGanesh Raghu
Ganesh Raghu
MRMartine Remy-Jardin
Martine Remy-Jardin
LRLuca Richeldi
Luca Richeldi
CTCarey C. Thomson
Carey C. Thomson
YIYoshikazu Inoue
Yoshikazu Inoue
KWKevin C. Wilson
Kevin C. Wilson
Background: This American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax guideline updates prior idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines and addresses the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF. Methods: A committee was composed of multidisciplinary experts in ILD, methodologists, and patient representatives. 1) Update of IPF: Radiological and histopathological criteria for IPF were updated by consensus. Questions about transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, genomic classifier testing, antacid medication, and antireflux surgery were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. 2) Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): PPF was defined, and then radiological and physiological criteria for PPF were determined by consensus. Questions about pirfenidone and nintedanib were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach. Results: 1) Update of IPF: A conditional recommendation was made to regard transbronchial lung cryobiopsy as an acceptable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in centers with appropriate expertise. No recommendation was made for or against genomic classifier testing. Conditional recommendations were made against antacid medication and antireflux surgery for the treatment of IPF. 2) PPF: PPF was defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation in a patient with an ILD other than IPF. A conditional recommendation was made for nintedanib, and additional research into pirfenidone was recommended. Conclusions: The conditional recommendations in this guideline are intended to provide the basis for rational, informed decisions by clinicians.

3 September 2020 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMarlies S. Wijsenbeek
Marlies S. Wijsenbeek
Vincent CottinVincent Cottin
Vincent Cottin
This review covers fibrotic pulmonary diseases. Although idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is very common, the review focuses mainly on fibrotic diseases other than IPF. The biology, clinical presentation, and treatment of the more common disorders are discussed.

11 August 2022 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMarlies S. Wijsenbeek
Marlies S. Wijsenbeek
ASAtsushi Suzuki
Atsushi Suzuki
TMToby M Maher
Toby M Maher

1 February 2019 in Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHP. Heukels
P. Heukels
CMCatharina C. Moor
Catharina C. Moor
JTJan H von der Thüsen
Jan H von der Thüsen
MWMarlies S. Wijsenbeek
Marlies S. Wijsenbeek
MKMirjam Kool
Mirjam Kool

12 June 2025 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLuca Richeldi
Luca Richeldi
AAArata Azuma
Arata Azuma
Vincent CottinVincent Cottin
Vincent Cottin
MKMichael Kreuter
Michael Kreuter
TMToby M. Maher
Toby M. Maher
MWMarlies S. Wijsenbeek
Marlies S. Wijsenbeek
Nerandomilast (BI 1015550) is an orally administered preferential inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4B with antifibrotic and immunomodulatory effects. In a phase 2 trial involving patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, treatment with nerandomilast stabilized lung function over a period of 12 weeks. In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nerandomilast at a dose of 18 mg twice daily, nerandomilast at a dose of 9 mg twice daily, or placebo, with stratification according to background antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib or pirfenidone vs. none). The primary end point was the absolute change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC), measured in milliliters, at week 52. A total of 1177 patients underwent randomization, of whom 77.7% were taking nintedanib or pirfenidone at enrollment. Adjusted mean changes in FVC at week 52 were -114.7 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], -141.8 to -87.5) in the nerandomilast 18-mg group, -138.6 ml (95% CI, -165.6 to -111.6) in the nerandomilast 9-mg group, and -183.5 ml (95% CI, -210.9 to -156.1) in the placebo group. The adjusted difference between the nerandomilast 18-mg group and the placebo group was 68.8 ml (95% CI, 30.3 to 107.4; P<0.001), and the adjusted difference between the nerandomilast 9-mg group and the placebo group was 44.9 ml (95% CI, 6.4 to 83.3; P = 0.02). The most frequent adverse event in the nerandomilast groups was diarrhea, reported in 41.3% of the 18-mg group and 31.1% of the 9-mg group, as compared with 16.0% in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were balanced across trial groups. In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, treatment with nerandomilast resulted in a smaller decline in the FVC than placebo over a period of 52 weeks. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; FIBRONEER-IPF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05321069.).

6 December 2017 in European Respiratory Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLisa H. Lancaster
Lisa H. Lancaster
JAJoao A. de Andrade
Joao A. de Andrade
JZJoseph D. Zibrak
Joseph D. Zibrak
MPMaria L. Padilla
Maria L. Padilla
CACarlo Albera
Carlo Albera
UCUlrich Costabel
Ulrich Costabel
Pirfenidone is one of two approved therapies for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Randomised controlled clinical trials and subsequentpost hocanalyses have demonstrated that pirfenidone reduces lung function decline, decreases mortality and improves progression-free survival. Long-term extension trials, registries and real-world studies have also shown similar treatment effects with pirfenidone. However, for patients with IPF to obtain the maximum benefits of pirfenidone treatment, the potential adverse events (AEs) associated with pirfenidone need to be managed. This review highlights the well-known and established safety profile of pirfenidone based on randomised controlled clinical trials and real-world data. Key strategies for preventing and managing the most common pirfenidone-related AEs are described, with the goal of maximising adherence to pirfenidone with minimal AEs.