Black-white disparities in breastfeeding duration result, in part, from disparities in initiation.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth and childhood poverty each adversely impact children’s cognitive development and academic outcomes. In this study, we investigated whether the relationships between preterm and early term birth and children’s cognitive scores at 3, 5, and 7 years old were modified by childhood poverty. METHODS: This study was conducted by using data on singletons born at 24 to 40 weeks’ gestation enrolled in the Millennium Cohort Study in the United Kingdom. Linear regression models were used to test independent and joint associations of gestational age (early or moderate preterm, late preterm, or early term compared with term) and childhood poverty (<60% of median UK income) with children’s cognitive scores. Presence of additive interaction between gestational age and poverty was tested by using interaction terms. RESULTS: Children born preterm (<37 weeks) or early term (37–38 weeks) tended to score more poorly on cognitive assessments than children born at term (39–40 weeks). The estimated deficits were ∼0.2 to 0.3 SD for early or moderate preterm, 0.1 SD for late preterm, and 0.05 SD for early term compared with term. Children living in poverty scored 0.3 to 0.4 SD worse than children not living in poverty on all assessments. For most assessments, the estimated effects of the 2 factors were approximately additive, with little or no evidence of interaction between gestational age and poverty. CONCLUSIONS: Although children born preterm who lived in poverty had the poorest cognitive outcomes, living in poverty did not magnify the adverse effect of being preterm on cognitive development.

Being born preterm and being raised in poverty are each linked with adverse cognitive outcomes. Using data from 5,250 singletons born in the United States in 2001 and enrolled in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort, we examined whether household socioeconomic status (SES) modified the association between preterm birth (PTB) and children’s scores on cognitive assessments at age 2 years and reading and mathematics assessments at kindergarten age. Gestational age was measured from birth certificates and categorized as early preterm, moderate preterm, late preterm, early term, and term. SES was measured at age 9 months using a composite of parental education, occupation, and income. PTB was associated with 0.1- to 0.6-standard deviation-deficits in 2-year cognitive ability and kindergarten mathematics scores and with 0.1- to 0.4-standard-deviation deficits in kindergarten reading scores. Children living in the lowest (versus highest) SES quintile scored 0.6 standard deviations lower on 2-year cognitive ability, 1.1 standard deviations lower on kindergarten reading, and 0.9 standard deviations lower on kindergarten mathematics. The association between PTB and cognitive outcomes did not differ by postnatal SES. However, children who were both born preterm and lived in lower-SES households had the poorest performance on all 3 outcomes and therefore may represent a uniquely high-risk group.

Background: Experiences during the birth hospitalization affect breastfeeding outcomes. In the United States, hospital policies and practices supportive of breastfeeding are routinely assessed through the Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINC) survey; however, mPINC does not capture data on breastfeeding outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from the 2015 mPINC survey were linked to 2015 data from the Joint Commission (TJC), a major accreditor of health care systems in the United States (n = 1,305 hospitals). Each hospital participating in mPINC is given a total score, which is the average of seven subscores; all ranging from 0 to 100. TJC has hospital-specific data on the percentage of infants exclusively breastfeeding at hospital discharge. We used linear regression to estimate differences between quartiles of (1) total mPINC score and (2) each mPINC subscore with rates of exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge, adjusting for hospital type, teaching status, and number of annual births. We additionally used linear models to test for trend across quartiles of mPINC score. Results: The mean percentage of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding increased from 39.0% for hospitals in the lowest mPINC total score quartile (<75) to 60.4% for hospitals in the highest mPINC total score quartile (≥89), an adjusted difference of 21.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval 18.6-23.6). The mean percentage of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding significantly increased (p < 0.0001) as mPINC scores increased for total mPINC score and for each mPINC subscore. Conclusions: Higher mPINC scores were associated with higher rates of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding. Hospitals can make improvements to their maternity care practices and policies to support breastfeeding.

Background: To describe the availability and nutrient composition of U.S. commercially available squeeze pouch infant and toddler foods in 2015. Materials and Methods: Data were from information presented on nutrition labels for 703 ready-to-serve, pureed food products from 24 major U.S. infant and toddler food brands. We described nutritional components (e.g., calories, fat) and compared them between packaging types (squeeze pouch versus other packaging types) within food categories. Results: 397 (56%) of the analyzed food products were packaged as squeeze pouches. Differences in 13 nutritional components between squeeze pouch versus other packaging types were generally small and varied by food category. Squeeze pouches in the fruits and vegetables, fruit-based, and vegetable-based categories were more likely to contain added sugars than other package types. Conclusion: In 2015, squeeze pouches were prevalent in the U.S. commercial infant and toddler food market. Nutrient composition differed between squeeze pouches and other packaging types for some macro- and micronutrients. Although it is recommended that infants and toddlers under two years old not consume any added sugars, a specific area of concern may be the inclusion of sources of added sugar in squeeze pouches. Linking this information with children’s dietary intake would facilitate understanding how these differences affect overall diet quality.