Birthe Kragelund

Prof. Dr. Birthe Kragelund

Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 November 2023 in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAlex S. Holehouse
Alex S. Holehouse
BKBirthe Kragelund
Birthe Kragelund

24 March 2009 in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KTKaare Teilum
Kaare Teilum
JOJohan G. Olsen
Johan G. Olsen
BKBirthe Kragelund
Birthe Kragelund

21 July 2010 in Protein Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMagnus Kjaergaard
Magnus Kjaergaard
ANAnn‒Beth Nørholm
Ann‒Beth Nørholm
RHRuth Hendus‒Altenburger
Ruth Hendus‒Altenburger
SPStine Falsig Pedersen
Stine Falsig Pedersen
FPFlemming M. Poulsen
Flemming M. Poulsen
BKBirthe Kragelund
Birthe Kragelund
Structural characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is mandatory for deciphering their potential unique physical and biological properties. A large number of circular dichroism (CD) studies have demonstrated that a structural change takes place in IDPs with increasing temperature, which most likely reflects formation of transient α‒helices or loss of polyproline II (PPII) content. Using three IDPs, ACTR, NHE1, and Spd1, we show that the temperature‐induced structural change is common among IDPs and is accompanied by a contraction of the conformational ensemble. This phenomenon was explored at residue resolution by multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Intrinsic chemical shift referencing allowed us to identify regions of transiently formed helices and their temperature‐dependent changes in helicity. All helical regions were found to lose rather than gain helical structures with increasing temperature, and accordingly these were not responsible for the change in the CD spectra. In contrast, the nonhelical regions exhibited a general temperature‐dependent structural change that was independent of long‐range interactions. The temperature‐dependent CD spectroscopic signature of IDPs that has been amply documented can be rationalized to represent redistribution of the statistical coil involving a general loss of PPII conformations.

1 March 2005 in Protein Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKaren L. Maxwell
Karen L. Maxwell
DWDavid Wildes
David Wildes
AZArash Zarrine‐Afsar
Arash Zarrine‐Afsar
MRMiguel A. De Los Rios
Miguel A. De Los Rios
ABAndrew G. Brown
Andrew G. Brown
KPKevin Plaxco
Kevin Plaxco

1 August 2011 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKaare Teilum
Kaare Teilum
JOJohan G. Olsen
Johan G. Olsen
BKBirthe Kragelund
Birthe Kragelund

16 June 2020 in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKatrine Bugge
Katrine Bugge
IBInna Brakti
Inna Brakti
CFCatarina B. Fernandes
Catarina B. Fernandes
JDJesper E. Dreier
Jesper E. Dreier
JLJeppe E. Lundsgaard
Jeppe E. Lundsgaard
BKBirthe Kragelund
Birthe Kragelund
Living organisms depend on timely and organized interactions between proteins linked in interactomes of high complexity. The recent increased precision by which protein interactions can be studied, and the enclosure of intrinsic structural disorder, suggest that it is time to zoom out and embrace protein interactions beyond the most central points of physical encounter. The present paper discusses protein–protein interactions in the view of structural disorder with an emphasis on flanking regions and contexts of disorder-based interactions. Context constitutes an overarching concept being of physicochemical, biomolecular, and physiological nature, but it also includes the immediate molecular context of the interaction. For intrinsically disordered proteins, which often function by exploiting short linear motifs, context contributes in highly regulatory and decisive manners and constitute a yet largely unrecognized source of interaction potential in a multitude of biological processes. Through selected examples, this review emphasizes how multivalency, charges and charge clusters, hydrophobic patches, dynamics, energetic frustration, and ensemble redistribution of flanking regions or disordered contexts are emerging as important contributors to allosteric regulation, positive and negative cooperativity, feedback regulation and negative selection in binding. The review emphasizes that understanding context, and in particular the role the molecular disordered context and flanking regions take on in protein interactions, constitute an untapped well of energetic modulation potential, also of relevance to drug discovery and development.