Ruina Xu

Ruina Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 August 2021 in Journal of Electronic Packaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RXRuina Xu
Ruina Xu
GWGaoyuan Wang
Gaoyuan Wang
PJPei-Xue Jiang
Pei-Xue Jiang
The rapid development of high-power electronic, energy, and propulsion systems has led us to the point where the performances of these systems are limited by their cooling capacities. Current electronics can generate heat fluxes up to 10–100 W/cm2, and heat flux over 1000 W/cm2 needs to be dissipated with a minimum coolant flow rate in next-generation power electronics. The multiple efficient heat transfer mechanisms have made spray cooling a high heat flux, uniform and efficient cooling technique proven effective in various applications. However, the cooling capacity and efficiency of spray cooling need to be further improved to meet the demands of next-generation ultrahigh-power applications. Engineering of surface properties and structures, which is enabled by state-of-the-art manufacturing techniques, can fundamentally affect the liquid–wall interactions in spray cooling, thus becoming the most promising way to enhance spray cooling. However, the mechanisms of surface-enhanced spray cooling are diverse and ambiguous, causing a lack of clear guiding principles for engineered surface design. Here, the progress in surface engineering-enhanced spray cooling is reviewed for surface structures of millimeter, micrometer, and nanometer scales and hierarchical structured surfaces, and the performances from the reviewed literature are evaluated and compared. The reviewed data show that spray cooling can achieve a critical heat flux (CHF) above 945.7 W/cm2 and a heat transfer coefficient (HTC) up to 57 W/cm2K on structured surfaces without the assistance of secondary gas flow and a CHF and an HTC up to 1250.1 W/cm2 and 250 W/cm2K, respectively, on a smooth surface with the assistance of secondary gas flow. A CHF enhancement up to 110% was achieved on a hybrid micro- and nanostructured surface. A clear map of enhancement mechanisms related to the scales of surface structures is proposed, which can help the design of engineered surfaces in spray cooling. Some future concerns are proposed as well. This work helps the understanding and design of engineered surfaces in spray cooling and provides insights for interdisciplinary applications of heat transfer and advanced engineering materials.

16 August 2017 in Accounts of Chemical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RXRuina Xu
Ruina Xu
RLRong Li
Rong Li
JMJin Ma
Jin Ma
DHDi He
Di He
PJPei-Xue Jiang
Pei-Xue Jiang
Geological carbon sequestration (GCS) in deep saline aquifers is an effective means for storing carbon dioxide to address global climate change. As the time after injection increases, the safety of storage increases as the CO2 transforms from a separate phase to CO2(aq) and HCO3– by dissolution and then to carbonates by mineral dissolution. However, subsequent depressurization could lead to dissolved CO2(aq) escaping from the formation water and creating a new separate phase which may reduce the GCS system safety. The mineral dissolution and the CO2 exsolution and mineral precipitation during depressurization change the morphology, porosity, and permeability of the porous rock medium, which then affects the two-phase flow of the CO2 and formation water. A better understanding of these effects on the CO2–water two-phase flow will improve predictions of the long-term CO2 storage reliability, especially the impact of depressurization on the long-term stability. In this Account, we summarize our recent work on the effect of CO2 exsolution and mineral dissolution/precipitation on CO2 transport in GCS reservoirs. We place emphasis on understanding the behavior and transformation of the carbon components in the reservoir, including CO2(sc/g), CO2(aq), HCO3–, and carbonate minerals (calcite and dolomite), highlight their transport and mobility by coupled geochemical and two-phase flow processes, and consider the implications of these transport mechanisms on estimates of the long-term safety of GCS. We describe experimental and numerical pore- and core-scale methods used in our lab in conjunction with industrial and international partners to investigate these effects. Experimental results show how mineral dissolution affects permeability, capillary pressure, and relative permeability, which are important phenomena affecting the input parameters for reservoir flow modeling. The porosity and the absolute permeability increase when CO2 dissolved water is continuously injected through the core. The MRI results indicate dissolution of the carbonates during the experiments since the porosity has been increased after the core-flooding experiments. The mineral dissolution changes the pore structure by enlarging the throat diameters and decreasing the pore specific surface areas, resulting in lower CO2/water capillary pressures and changes in the relative permeability. When the reservoir pressure decreases, the CO2 exsolution occurs due to the reduction of solubility. The CO2 bubbles preferentially grow toward the larger pores instead of toward the throats or the finer pores during the depressurization. After exsolution, the exsolved CO2 phase shows low mobility due to the highly dispersed pore-scale morphology, and the well dispersed small bubbles tend to merge without interface contact driven by the Ostwald ripening mechanism. During depressurization, the dissolved carbonate could also precipitate as a result of increasing pH. There is increasing formation water flow resistance and low mobility of the CO2 in the presence of CO2 exsolution and carbonate precipitation. These effects produce a self-sealing mechanism that may reduce unfavorable CO2 migration even in the presence of sudden reservoir depressurization.

16 December 2016 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLRong Li
Rong Li
PJPeixue Jiang
Peixue Jiang
CGCheng Gao
Cheng Gao
FHFeng Huang
Feng Huang
RXRuina Xu
Ruina Xu
XCXue Chen
Xue Chen

20 November 2018 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KZKecheng Zeng
Kecheng Zeng
PJPei-Xue Jiang
Pei-Xue Jiang
ZLZengmin Lun
Zengmin Lun
RXRuina Xu
Ruina Xu

15 November 2019 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDi He
Di He
PJPei-Xue Jiang
Pei-Xue Jiang
RXRuina Xu
Ruina Xu

30 June 2017 in Langmuir
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XCXue Chen
Xue Chen
JCJiannan Chen
Jiannan Chen
XOXiaolong Ouyang
Xiaolong Ouyang
YSYu Song
Yu Song
RXRuina Xu
Ruina Xu
PJPei-Xue Jiang
Pei-Xue Jiang