Ruben Nunes

Dr. Ruben Nunes

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2015 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALeonardo Azevedo
Leonardo Azevedo
RNRuben Nunes
Ruben Nunes
ASAmilcar Soares
Amilcar Soares
EMEvaldo C. Mundin
Evaldo C. Mundin
GNGuenther Schwedersky Neto
Guenther Schwedersky Neto
We have developed a new iterative geostatistical seismic amplitude variation with angle (AVA) inversion algorithm that inverts prestack seismic data, sorted by angle gathers, directly for high-resolution density, P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and facies models. This novel iterative geostatistical inverse procedure is based on two key main principles: the use of stochastic sequential simulation and cosimulation as the perturbation technique of the model parameter space and a global optimizer based on a crossover genetic algorithm to converge the simulated earth models toward an objective function, in this case, the mismatch between the recorded and synthetic prestack seismic data. As a geostatistical approach, all the elastic models simulated during the iterative procedure honors the well-log data at its own locations, the marginal prior distributions of P-wave velocity and S-wave velocity, and density estimated from the available well-log data, and the corresponding joint distributions between density versus P-wave velocity and P-wave versus S-wave velocity. We successfully tested and implemented this new algorithm on a synthetic prestack data set that mimicked the main properties of a real reservoir, and on a real seismic data set acquired over a deepwater turbidite oil reservoir. In both cases, the results showed a good convergence between the recorded and synthetic seismic. The synthetic example showed high-resolution inverted petroelastic models that reproduced the true petroelastic models. The inverted petroelastic models retrieved from the real case study found high resolution and do agree with previous seismic reservoir characterization studies.

1 August 2010 in Computers & Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RNRuben Nunes
Ruben Nunes
JAJosé Almeida
José Almeida

27 November 2013 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALeonardo Azevedo
Leonardo Azevedo
RNRuben Nunes
Ruben Nunes
PCPedro Correia
Pedro Correia
ASAmilcar Soares
Amilcar Soares
LGLuis Guerreiro
Luis Guerreiro
GNGuenther Schwedersky Neto
Guenther Schwedersky Neto
Due to the nature of seismic inversion problems, there are multiple possible solutions that can equally fit the observed seismic data while diverging from the real subsurface model. Consequently, it is important to assess how inverse-impedance models are converging toward the real subsurface model. For this purpose, we evaluated a new methodology to combine the multidimensional scaling (MDS) technique with an iterative geostatistical elastic seismic inversion algorithm. The geostatistical inversion algorithm inverted partial angle stacks directly for acoustic and elastic impedance (AI and EI) models. It was based on a genetic algorithm in which the model perturbation at each iteration was performed recurring to stochastic sequential simulation. To assess the reliability and convergence of the inverted models at each step, the simulated models can be projected in a metric space computed by MDS. This projection allowed distinguishing similar from variable models and assessing the convergence of inverted models toward the real impedance ones. The geostatistical inversion results of a synthetic data set, in which the real AI and EI models are known, were plotted in this metric space along with the known impedance models. We applied the same principle to a real data set using a cross-validation technique. These examples revealed that the MDS is a valuable tool to evaluate the convergence of the inverse methodology and the impedance model variability among each iteration of the inversion process. Particularly for the geostatistical inversion algorithm we evaluated, it retrieves reliable impedance models while still producing a set of simulated models with considerable variability.

10 November 2017 in Geophysical Prospecting
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALeonardo Azevedo
Leonardo Azevedo
RNRuben Nunes
Ruben Nunes
ASAmílcar Soares
Amílcar Soares
GNGuenther Schwedersky Neto
Guenther Schwedersky Neto
TMTeresa S. Martins
Teresa S. Martins

29 August 2016 in Mathematical Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RNRuben Nunes
Ruben Nunes
ASAmilcar Soares
Amilcar Soares
LALeonardo Azevedo
Leonardo Azevedo
PPPedro Pereira
Pedro Pereira

2 January 2017 in Mathematical Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAmilcar Soares
Amilcar Soares
RNRuben Nunes
Ruben Nunes
LALeonardo Azevedo
Leonardo Azevedo