Catherine Tuleu

Prof. Catherine Tuleu

Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, London WC1N 1AX, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 July 2015 in Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FLFelipe L Lopez
Felipe L Lopez
TETerry B Ernest
Terry B Ernest
Catherine TuleuCatherine Tuleu
Catherine Tuleu
MGMine Orlu Gul
Mine Orlu Gul
Most conventional drug delivery systems are not acceptable for pediatric patients as they differ in their developmental status and dosing requirements from other subsets of the population. Technology platforms are required to aid the development of age-appropriate medicines to maximize patient acceptability while maintaining safety, efficacy, accessibility and affordability. The current approaches and novel developments in the field of age-appropriate drug delivery for pediatric patients are critically discussed including patient-centric formulations, administration devices and packaging systems. Despite the incentives provided by recent regulatory modifications and the efforts of formulation scientists, there is still a need for implementation of pharmaceutical technologies that enable the manufacture of licensed age-appropriate formulations. Harmonization of endeavors from regulators, industry and academia by sharing learning associated with data obtained from pediatric investigation plans, product development pathways and scientific projects would be the way forward to speed up bench-to-market age appropriate formulation development. A collaborative approach will benefit not only pediatrics, but other patient populations such as geriatrics would also benefit from an accelerated patient-centric approach to drug delivery.

1 June 2014 in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JWJennifer Walsh
Jennifer Walsh
ACAnne Cram
Anne Cram
KWKatharina Woertz
Katharina Woertz
JBJoerg Breitkreutz
Joerg Breitkreutz
GWGesine Winzenburg
Gesine Winzenburg
Catherine TuleuCatherine Tuleu
Catherine Tuleu
The development of paediatric medicines can be challenging since this is a diverse patient population with specific needs. For example, the toxicity of excipients may differ in children compared to adults and children have different taste preferences. Acceptable palatability of oral paediatric medicinal products is of great importance to facilitate patient adherence. This has been recognised by regulatory authorities and so is becoming a key aspect of paediatric pharmaceutical development studies. Many active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) have aversive taste characteristics and so it is necessary to utilise taste masking techniques to improve the palatability of paediatric oral formulations. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of different approaches to taste masking APIs in paediatric oral dosage forms, with a focus on the tolerability of excipients used. In addition, where possible, the provision of examples of some marketed products is made.

2 October 2014 in Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFang Liu
Fang Liu
SRSejal R Ranmal
Sejal R Ranmal
HBHannah Batchelor
Hannah Batchelor
MOMine Orlu-Gul
Mine Orlu-Gul
TETerry B. Ernest
Terry B. Ernest
Catherine TuleuCatherine Tuleu
Catherine Tuleu
Patient acceptability of a medicinal product is a key aspect in the development and prescribing of medicines. Children and older adults differ in many aspects from the other age subsets of population and require particular considerations in medication acceptability. This review highlights the similarities and differences in these two age groups in relation to factors affecting acceptability of medicines. New and conventional formulations of medicines are considered regarding their appropriateness for use in children and older people. Aspects of a formulation that impact acceptability in these patient groups are discussed, including, for example, taste/smell/viscosity of a liquid and size/shape of a tablet. A better understanding of the acceptability of existing formulations highlights opportunities for the development of new and more acceptable medicines and facilitates safe and effective prescribing for the young and older populations.

1 February 2009 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STSarah A. Thomson
Sarah A. Thomson
Catherine TuleuCatherine Tuleu
Catherine Tuleu
IWIan Chi Kei Wong
Ian Chi Kei Wong
SKSimon Keady
Simon Keady
KPKendal G. Pitt
Kendal G. Pitt
ASAlastair G. Sutcliffe
Alastair G. Sutcliffe
OBJECTIVE. The goal was to assess the acceptability and suitability of placebo minitablets for preschool-aged children. METHODS. One hundred children 2 to 6 years of age were recruited from a major London hospital. How to swallow the minitablet was discussed with the child, and chewing was discouraged. The parents were asked to administer 1 minitablet (placebo, 3-mm diameter) to the child. The outcomes were recorded as (1) swallowed, (2) chewed, (3) spat out, or (4) refused to take. RESULTS. Of the youngest children (2 years of age), almost one half (46%) swallowed the minitablet. The proportion increased to 53% for children 3 years of age. Children ≥4 years of age were more likely to swallow the minitablet than not to swallow the minitablet, with 85% of 5-year-old children swallowing the minitablet. The ability to swallow the minitablet was not affected by gender. CONCLUSIONS. This study demonstrated the potential to use minitablets for the treatment of preschool-aged children and suggests that minitablets can be used as a potential new formulation for children in this age range.

1 August 2005 in International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJoseph F. Standing
Joseph F. Standing
Catherine TuleuCatherine Tuleu
Catherine Tuleu

17 November 2020 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PJPatricija Januskaite
Patricija Januskaite
Xiaoyan XuXiaoyan Xu
Xiaoyan Xu
SRSejal R Ranmal
Sejal R Ranmal
Simon GaisfordSimon Gaisford
Simon Gaisford
ABAbdul W Basit
Abdul W Basit
AGAlvaro Goyanes
Alvaro Goyanes
3D printing (3DP) in the pharmaceutical field is a disruptive technology that allows the preparation of personalised medicines at the point of dispensing. The paediatric population presents a variety of pharmaceutical formulation challenges such as dose flexibility, patient compliance, taste masking and the fear or difficulty to swallow tablets, all factors that could be overcome using the adaptable nature of 3DP. User acceptability studies of 3D printed formulations have been previously carried out in adults; however, feedback from children themselves is essential in establishing the quality target product profile towards the development of age-appropriate medicines. The aim of this study was to investigate the preference of children for different 3D printed tablets (Printlets™) as an important precursor to patient acceptability studies. Four different 3DP technologies; digital light processing (DLP), selective laser sintering (SLS), semi-solid extrusion (SSE) and fused deposition modeling (FDM) were used to prepare placebo printlets with similar physical attributes including size and shape. A single-site, two-part survey was completed with participants aged 4–11 years to determine their preference and opinions based on visual inspection of the printlets. A total of 368 participants completed an individual open questionnaire to visually select the best and worst printlet, and 310 participants completed further non-compulsory open questions to elaborate on their choices. Overall, the DLP printlets were the most visually appealing to the children (61.7%) followed by the SLS printlets (21.2%), and with both the FDM (5.4%) and SSE (11.7%) printlets receiving the lowest scores. However, after being informed that the SSE printlets were chewable, the majority of participants changed their selection and favoured this printlet, despite their original choice, in line with children’s preference towards chewable dosage forms. Participant age and sex displayed no significant differences in printlet selection. Printlet descriptions were grouped into four distinct categories; appearance, perceived taste, texture and familiarity, and were found to be equally important when creating a quality target product profile for paediatric 3D printed formulations. This study is the first to investigate children’s perceptions of printlets, and the findings aim to provide guidance for further development of paediatric-appropriate medicines using different 3DP technologies.