Objectives: Police-recorded crimes are used by police forces to document community differences in crime and design spatially targeted strategies. Nevertheless, crimes known to police are affected by selection biases driven by underreporting. This paper presents a simulation study to analyze if crime statistics aggregated at small spatial scales are affected by larger bias than maps produced for larger geographies. Methods: Based on parameters obtained from the UK Census, we simulate a synthetic population consistent with the characteristics of Manchester. Then, based on parameters derived from the Crime Survey for England and Wales, we simulate crimes suffered by individuals, and their likelihood to be known to police. This allows comparing the difference between all crimes and police-recorded incidents at different scales. Results: Measures of dispersion of the relative difference between all crimes and police-recorded crimes are larger when incidents are aggregated to small geographies. The percentage of crimes unknown to police varies widely across small areas, underestimating crime in certain places while overestimating it in others. Conclusions: Micro-level crime analysis is affected by a larger risk of bias than crimes aggregated at larger scales. These results raise awareness about an important shortcoming of micro-level mapping, and further efforts are needed to improve crime estimates.

Worry about crime is known to be higher in some European regions than others. However, cross-national surveys, which are the main source of information to map worry about crime across Europe, are designed to be representative of large areas (countries), and regions often suffer from small and unrepresentative sample sizes. This research produces reliable model-based small area estimates of worry about crime at regional level from European Social Survey data, in order to map the phenomenon and examine its macro-level predictors. Model-based small area estimation techniques borrow strength across areas to produce reliable estimates of parameters of interest. Estimates of worry about crime are higher in most South and East European regions, in contrast to Northern and Central Europe.

There is growing interest within National Statistical Institutes in combining available datasets containing information on a large variety of social domains. Statistical matching approaches can be used to integrate data sources through a common set of variables where each dataset contains different units that belong to the same target population. However, a common problem is related to the assumption of conditional independence among variables observed in different data sources. In this context, an auxiliary dataset containing all the variables jointly can be used to improve the statistical matching by providing information on the correlation structure of variables observed across different datasets. We propose modifying the prediction models from the auxiliary dataset through a calibration step and show that we can improve the outcome of statistical matching in a variety of settings. We evaluate the proposed approach via simulation and an application based on the European Union Statistics for Income and Living Conditions and Living Costs and Food Survey for the United Kingdom.

Small area estimation (SAE) plays a crucial role in the social sciences due to the growing need for reliable and accurate estimates for small domains. In the study of well-being, for example, policy makers need detailed information about the geographical distribution of a range of social indicators. We investigate data dimensionality reduction using factor analysis models and implement SAE on the factor scores under the empirical best linear unbiased prediction approach. We contrast this approach with the standard approach of providing a dashboard of indicators or a weighted average of indicators at the local level. We demonstrate the approach in a simulation study and a real data application based on the European Union Statistics for Income and Living Conditions for the municipalities of Tuscany.

This article deals with mean squared error (MSE) estimation of a multivariate empirical best linear unbiased predictor (MEBLUP) under the unit-level multivariate nested-errors regression model for small area estimation via parametric bootstrap. A simulation study is designed to evaluate the performance of our algorithm and compare it with the univariate case bootstrap MSE which has been shown to be consistent to the true MSE. The simulation shows that, in line with the literature, MEBLUP provides unbiased estimates with lower MSE than EBLUP. We also provide a short empirical analysis based on real data collected from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.