Damian Junk

Dr. Damian Junk


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2013 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHyeonJoo Cheon
HyeonJoo Cheon
EHElise G Holvey‐Bates
Elise G Holvey‐Bates
JSJohn W Schoggins
John W Schoggins
SFSamuel Forster
Samuel Forster
PHPaul Hertzog
Paul Hertzog
GSGeorge R Stark
George R Stark
A single high dose of interferon‐β (IFNβ) activates powerful cellular responses, in which many anti‐viral, pro‐apoptotic, and anti‐proliferative proteins are highly expressed. Since some of these proteins are deleterious, cells downregulate this initial response rapidly. However, the expression of many anti‐viral proteins that do no harm is sustained, prolonging a substantial part of the initial anti‐viral response for days and also providing resistance to DNA damage. While the transcription factor ISGF3 (IRF9 and tyrosine‐phosphorylated STATs 1 and 2) drives the first rapid response phase, the related factor un‐phosphorylated ISGF3 (U‐ISGF3), formed by IFNβ‐induced high levels of IRF9 and STATs 1 and 2 without tyrosine phosphorylation, drives the second prolonged response. The U‐ISGF3‐induced anti‐viral genes that show prolonged expression are driven by distinct IFN stimulated response elements (ISREs). Continuous exposure of cells to a low level of IFNβ, often seen in cancers, leads to steady‐state increased expression of only the U‐ISGF3‐dependent proteins, with no sustained increase in other IFNβ‐induced proteins, and to constitutive resistance to DNA damage.

12 March 2015 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VAValery Adorno-Cruz
Valery Adorno-Cruz
GKGolam Kibria
Golam Kibria
XLXia Liu
Xia Liu
MDMary Doherty
Mary Doherty
DJDamian Junk
Damian Junk
HLHuiping Liu
Huiping Liu
With the goal to remove the roots of cancer, eliminate metastatic seeds, and overcome therapy resistance, the 2014 inaugural International Cancer Stem Cell (CSC) Conference at Cleveland, OH, convened together over 320 investigators, including 55 invited world-class speakers, 25 short oral presenters, and 100 poster presenters, to gain an in-depth understanding of CSCs and explore therapeutic opportunities targeting CSCs. The meeting enabled intriguing discussions on several topics including: genetics and epigenetics; cancer origin and evolution; microenvironment and exosomes; metabolism and inflammation; metastasis and therapy resistance; single cell and heterogeneity; plasticity and reprogramming; as well as other new concepts. Reports of clinical trials targeting CSCs emphasized the urgent need for strategically designing combinational CSC-targeting therapies against cancer. Cancer Res; 75(6); 924–9. ©2015 AACR.

5 January 2016 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMary R. Doherty
Mary R. Doherty
JSJacob Smigiel
Jacob Smigiel
DJDamian Junk
Damian Junk
MJMark Jackson
Mark Jackson
The connection between epithelial-mesenchymal (E-M) plasticity and cancer stem cell (CSC) properties has been paradigm-shifting, linking tumor cell invasion and metastasis with therapeutic recurrence. However, despite their importance, the molecular pathways involved in generating invasive, metastatic, and therapy-resistant CSCs remain poorly understood. The enrichment of cells with a mesenchymal/CSC phenotype following therapy has been interpreted in two different ways. The original interpretation posited that therapy kills non-CSCs while sparing pre-existing CSCs. However, evidence is emerging that suggests non-CSCs can be induced into a transient, drug-tolerant, CSC-like state by chemotherapy. The ability to transition between distinct cell states may be as critical for the survival of tumor cells following therapy as it is for metastatic progression. Therefore, inhibition of the pathways that promote E-M and CSC plasticity may suppress tumor recurrence following chemotherapy. Here, we review the emerging appreciation for how plasticity confers therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence.

11 December 2017 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMary R. Doherty
Mary R. Doherty
HCHyeonJoo Cheon
HyeonJoo Cheon
DJDamian Junk
Damian Junk
SVShaveta Vinayak
Shaveta Vinayak
VVVinay Varadan
Vinay Varadan
MJMark Jackson
Mark Jackson
Significance: Current cancer therapies fail to repress tumor recurrence and metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) because they fail to target cells that possess epithelial–mesenchymal (E-M) plasticity and acquire cancer stem cell (CSC) properties. Identifying and engaging signaling pathways that regulate E-M/CSC plasticity within TNBC therefore remains an unmet critical clinical need. Recent evidence demonstrates that presence of E-M/CSC plasticity in TNBC correlates with a repressed interferon/STAT gene signature. Our data demonstrate that exogenous IFN-β targets and represses E-M/CSC plasticity by reengaging type I IFN signaling in CSC. Our findings have clinical relevance, as IFN-β signaling correlates with improved patient survival and repressed CSC in TNBC. Thus, our work suggests a therapeutic use for IFN-β in the repression of E-M/CSC–driven tumor recurrence and metastasis in TNBC.

16 June 2005 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOMarc M Oshiro
Marc M Oshiro
CKChristina J Kim
Christina J Kim
RWRyan J Wozniak
Ryan J Wozniak
DJDamian Junk
Damian Junk
JMJosé L Muñoz-Rodríguez
José L Muñoz-Rodríguez
BFBernard W Futscher
Bernard W Futscher
Introduction: Desmocollin 3 (DSC3) is a member of the cadherin superfamily of calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecules and a principle component of desmosomes. Desmosomal proteins such as DSC3 are integral to the maintenance of tissue architecture and the loss of these components leads to a lack of adhesion and a gain of cellular mobility. DSC3 expression is down-regulated in breast cancer cell lines and primary breast tumors; however, the loss of DSC3 is not due to gene deletion or gross rearrangement of the gene. In this study, we examined the prevalence of epigenetic silencing of DSC3 gene expression in primary breast tumor specimens. Methods: We used bisulfite genomic sequencing to analyze the methylation state of the DSC3 promoter region from 32 primary breast tumor specimens. We also used a quantitative real-time RT-PCR approach, and analyzed all breast tumor specimens for DSC3 expression. Finally, in addition to bisulfite sequencing and RT-PCR, we used an in vivo nuclease accessibility assay to determine the chromatin architecture of the CpG island region from DSC3-negative breast cancer cells lines. Results: DSC3 expression was downregulated in 23 of 32 (72%) breast cancer specimens comprising: 22 invasive ductal carcinomas, 7 invasive lobular breast carcinomas, 2 invasive ductal carcinomas that metastasized to the lymph node, and a mucoid ductal carcinoma. Of the 23 specimens showing a loss of DSC3 expression, 13 (56%) were associated with cytosine hypermethylation of the promoter region. Furthermore, DSC3 expression is limited to cells of epithelial origin and its expression of mRNA and protein is lost in a high proportion of breast tumor cell lines (79%). Lastly, DNA hypermethylation of the DSC3 promoter is highly correlated with a closed chromatin structure. Conclusion: These results indicate that the loss of DSC3 expression is a common event in primary breast tumor specimens, and that DSC3 gene silencing in breast tumors is frequently linked to aberrant cytosine methylation and concomitant changes in chromatin structure.

5 June 2003 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MOMarc M Oshiro
Marc M Oshiro
GWGeorge S Watts
George S Watts
RWRyan J Wozniak
Ryan J Wozniak
DJDamian Junk
Damian Junk
JMJose L Munoz-Rodriguez
Jose L Munoz-Rodriguez
BFBernard W Futscher
Bernard W Futscher