Hubert Marotte

Hubert Marotte

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xavier RoblinXavier Roblin
Xavier Roblin
HMHubert Marotte
Hubert Marotte
MRMelanie Rinaudo
Melanie Rinaudo
ETEmilie Del Tedesco
Emilie Del Tedesco
AMAmelie Moreau
Amelie Moreau
SPStéphane Paul
Stéphane Paul

1 November 2013 in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPStéphane Paul
Stéphane Paul
ETEmilie Del Tedesco
Emilie Del Tedesco
HMHubert Marotte
Hubert Marotte
MRMelanie Rinaudo-Gaujous
Melanie Rinaudo-Gaujous
AMAmelie Moreau
Amelie Moreau
Xavier RoblinXavier Roblin
Xavier Roblin
Data on the value of therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) to predict mucosal healing (MH) in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are scarce. All consecutive patients with IBD receiving ongoing IFX (5 mg/kg) treatment and developing secondary failure to IFX were enrolled in a prospective study between June 2010 and May 2011. IFX trough levels, antibodies to IFX concentrations, C-reactive protein levels, and fecal calprotectin were measured before IFX optimization and at week 8. A proctosigmoidoscopy was performed on the day of first IFX optimization and at week 8 in all patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). MH was defined by fecal calprotectin 0.5 μg/mL was associated with MH (sensitivity [se], 0.88; specificity [sp], 0.77; P = 0.0001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.89). On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with MH after IFX optimization was a delta IFX >0.5 µg/mL (likelihood ratio = 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.08; P = 0.048) in patients with IBD. Therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX strongly predicts the likelihood of achieving MH following IFX dose intensification in both CD and UC.

20 September 2016 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jacques Éric GottenbergJacques Éric Gottenberg
Jacques Éric Gottenberg
OBOlivier Brocq
Olivier Brocq
APAleth Perdriger
Aleth Perdriger
SLSlim Lassoued
Slim Lassoued
JBJean-Marie Berthelot
Jean-Marie Berthelot
PRPhilippe Ravaud
Philippe Ravaud
Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors have improved the quality of life for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who show insufficient response to methotrexate.1 However, as many as one-third of patients2,3 have persistent disease activity and insufficient (inadequate) response to anti-TNF agents according to international recommendations.4 Therefore, alternatives are needed.

1 July 2006 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHubert Marotte
Hubert Marotte
PFP Farge
P Farge
PGP Gaudin
P Gaudin
CAC Alexandre
C Alexandre
BMB Mougin
B Mougin
PMP Miossec
P Miossec
Objective: To evaluate a possible association between wrist and periodontal destruction in rheumatoid arthritis, and between periodontal destruction, dry mouth, and labial salivary gland biopsy and the contribution of genetic factors (the shared epitope (SE) and IL1B (+3954) or TNFA (−238 or −308) gene polymorphisms). Methods: 147 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled. Periodontal damage was defined according to the Hugoson and Jordan criteria on panoramic dental x rays. Typing for the SE and cytokine polymorphisms was undertaken by enzyme linked oligosorbent assay. Odds ratios (OR), relative risk (RR), and χ2 values were calculated to quantify associations. Results: An association was observed between wrist and periodontal bone destruction (χ2 = 11.82; p<0.001): 63 patients had both wrist and periodontal destruction, 31 had wrist destruction alone, 20 had periodontal destruction alone, and 33 had no destruction at either site. An association was seen between a positive labial salivary gland biopsy and periodontal bone destruction (RR = 2.73 (95% CI, 1.35 to 5.51), p<0.01, n = 41) or wrist bone destruction (RR = 4.52 (1.96 to 10.45), p<0.001, n = 41). The SE was associated with wrist bone destruction (OR = 2.5 (1.16 to 5.42), p<0.05) and periodontal bone destruction (OR = 2.2 (1.04 to 4.84), p<0.05). No association was found between the selected cytokine polymorphisms and bone destruction. Conclusions: A strong association was found between wrist and periodontal bone destruction. The destruction risk was further increased in patients with sicca syndrome. The SE appears to be a severity genetic marker for both wrist and periodontal bone destruction.

23 September 2008 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASalahuddin Ahmed
Salahuddin Ahmed
HMHubert Marotte
Hubert Marotte
KKKevin Kwan
Kevin Kwan
JRJeffrey H. Ruth
Jeffrey H. Ruth
PCPhillip L. Campbell
Phillip L. Campbell
AKAlisa E. Koch
Alisa E. Koch
Regulation of IL-6 transsignaling by the administration of soluble gp130 (sgp130) receptor to capture the IL-6/soluble IL-6R complex has shown promise for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, enhancing endogenous sgp130 via alternative splicing of the gp130 gene has not yet been tested. We found that epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), an anti-inflammatory compound found in green tea, inhibits IL-1β–induced IL-6 production and transsignaling in RA synovial fibroblasts by inducing alternative splicing of gp130 mRNA, resulting in enhanced sgp130 production. Results from in vivo studies using a rat adjuvant-induced arthritis model showed specific inhibition of IL-6 levels in the serum and joints of EGCG-treated rats by 28% and 40%, respectively, with concomitant amelioration of rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. We also observed a marked decrease in membrane-bound gp130 protein expression in the joint homogenates of the EGCG-treated group. In contrast, quantitative RT-PCR showed that the gp130/IL-6Rα mRNA ratio increased by ∼2-fold, suggesting a possible mechanism of sgp130 activation by EGCG. Gelatin zymography results showed EGCG inhibits IL-6/soluble IL-6R–induced matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity in RA synovial fibroblasts and in joint homogenates, possibly via up-regulation of sgp130 synthesis. The results of these studies provide previously undescribed evidence of IL-6 synthesis and transsignaling inhibition by EGCG with a unique mechanism of sgp130 up-regulation, and thus hold promise as a potential therapeutic agent for RA.

28 June 2019 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFabrice Cognasse
Fabrice Cognasse
SLSandrine Laradi
Sandrine Laradi
PBPhilippe Berthelot
Philippe Berthelot
TBThomas Bourlet
Thomas Bourlet
HMHubert Marotte
Hubert Marotte
HHHind Hamzeh-Cognasse
Hind Hamzeh-Cognasse
Blood platelets play a central hemostatic role, (i) as they repair vascular epithelial damage, and (ii) they play immune defense roles, as they have the capacity to produce and secrete various cytokines, chemokines, and related products. Platelets sense and respond to local dangers (infectious or not). Platelets, therefore, mediate inflammation, express and use receptors to bind infectious pathogen moieties and endogenous ligands, among other components. Platelets contribute to effective pathogen clearance. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are danger signals released during inflammatory stress, such as burns, trauma and infection. Each pathogen is recognized by its specific molecular signature or pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). Recent data demonstrate that platelets have the capacity to sense external danger signals (DAMPs or PAMPs) differentially through a distinct type of pathogen recognition receptor (such as Toll-like receptors). Platelets regulate the innate immune response to pathogens and/or endogenous molecules, presenting several types of “danger” signals using a complete signalosome. Platelets, therefore, use complex tools to mediate a wide range of functions from danger sensing to tissue repair. Moreover, we noted that the secretory capacity of stored platelets over time and the development of stress lesions by platelets upon collection, processing, and storage are considered stress signals. The key message of this review is the “inflammatory response to stress” function of platelets in an infectious or non-infectious context.