Cem Karaali

Cem Karaali


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 December 2025 in Cirugía y Cirujanos
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKCem Karaali
Cem Karaali
HEHuseyin Esin
Huseyin Esin
EPEmel E. Pala
Emel E. Pala
MKMurat Keser
Murat Keser
OUOlçun U. Unal
Olçun U. Unal
MEMustafa Emiroglu
Mustafa Emiroglu
Objetivo: El propósito principal en las pacientes con cáncer de mama que reciben quimioterapia neoadyuvante (NAC) es lograr una respuesta patol...

30 November 2019 in The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKCem Karaali
Cem Karaali
MEMustafa Emiroglu
Mustafa Emiroglu
SASabri Atalay
Sabri Atalay
ISIsmail Sert
Ismail Sert
ADAyberk Dursun
Ayberk Dursun
CACengiz Aydın
Cengiz Aydın
Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a new antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SP) and antibiotics in discharge prescriptions used as a continuation of SP. Methodology: The study included elective patients with clean and clean-contaminated wounds. The accuracy of the assigned SP was evaluated according to international guidelines. Primary outcome measures comprised appropriateness of prophylactic antibiotic indication, correct timing of initial dose, discontinuation of SP within 24 hours, and antibiotic prescription at discharge. A secondary outcome measure was to determine whether the effect of ASP was sustained long-term. Results: The total compliance rate for all stages of SP increased from 8% to 52.1% after the intervention (p < 0.05). When analyzed according to individual SP components, it was found that although ASP did not change first dose timing rates, it did affect the rates of prophylactic antibiotic indication, discontinuation of SP within 24 hours and antibiotic prescription at discharge, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). In addition, ASP continued to increase its effectiveness throughout the 3rd year. Conclusions: Based on the findings of our study, it seems clear that the modified ASP introduced in our general surgery clinic can be used effectively and simply; in addition, this ASP increases its efficacy with time.

31 July 2020 in The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKCem Karaali
Cem Karaali
MEMustafa Emiroglu
Mustafa Emiroglu
HEHüseyin Esin
Hüseyin Esin
ISIsmail Sert
Ismail Sert
CACengiz Aydın
Cengiz Aydın
HOHedef Ozgun
Hedef Ozgun
Introduction: One of the most important aspects of inappropriate antibiotic use among general surgeons in Turkey is the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SP). In order to shed light on the current situation, we conducted a survey of general surgeons in our country. Our aim was to evaluate the approach taken by our general surgeons in prescribing SP, while providing data pertinent to the effectiveness of the ‘Rational Drug Use’ (AIK) national action plan. Methodology: A questionnaire on the subject of personal SP usage and compliance with guidelines was distributed amongst general surgeons between 2018-2019. The questions related to individual approaches taken by surgeons when treating patients with either clean or clean-contaminated wounds. Results of the questionnaires were collated and compliance with ASHP guidelines was evaluated. Results: A total of 317 completed questionnaires were evaluated. According to the questionnaire results, the rate of total compliance with ASHP guidelines was 26.8%. The compliance rate for preoperative SP was 69.7% in the clean wound group and 54.6% in the clean-contaminated wound group. Although 96.5% of the participants reported correct timing for the first dose of SP, this number dropped to 79.5% apropos the adminstration of further doses of prophylaxis. The percentage of surgeons prescribing continued antibiotics at discharge for clean and clean-contaminated cases was 22.7% and 38.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that inappropriate use of SP is widespread in our country, and that antibiotics continue to be prescribed at discharge.

1 October 2022 in European Journal of Breast Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gülden DinizGülden Diniz
Gülden Diniz
APAyşe Gül Pulular
Ayşe Gül Pulular
DKDudu Solakoğlu Kahraman
Dudu Solakoğlu Kahraman
UVUmut Varol
Umut Varol
SSSevil Sayhan
Sevil Sayhan
CKCem Karaali
Cem Karaali
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has important roles in immunity, cell proliferation, and carcinogenesis. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein also known as hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 1 and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin, has restricted expression in immune cells and healthy epithelial cells, but it is up-regulated in several human cancers. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic values of NGAL and KIM-1 expression in tumor cells and to detect the presence of NGAL-positive neutrophils (PNL) in the tumor microenvironment. The expression of NGAL and KIM-1 protein were assessed by immunohistochemical staining in tissue specimens from 412 primary breast cancer cases. In this series, the mean age of the patients was 55.6±12.4 years. In 218 (52.9%) cases, there was NGAL expression in tumor cells. In 104 (25.2%) cases there was KIM-1 expression in tumor cells. NGAL-positive inflammatory cells were seen in tumors of 45 (10.9%) cases. There was no significant relationship between NGAL-positive PNL presence in the tumor microenvironment and other clinicopathological features. However, there was a significant association between the presence of in situ carcinomas and NGAL expression (p = 0.008) and KIM-1 expression (p = 0.020) in tumor cells. This study has demonstrated positivity of NGAL and KIM-1 in breast cancer cells. Considering the development of anti-KIM-1 therapies, the presence of KIM-1 expression may be a new treatment option in breast cancer, especially in in situ component-rich tumors. These findings should be confirmed in larger series.

1 January 2024 in European Journal of Breast Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKCem Karaali
Cem Karaali
MEMümin Emiroğlu
Mümin Emiroğlu
MDMustafa Değirmenci
Mustafa Değirmenci
MKMurat Keser
Murat Keser
SSSemra Salimoğlu
Semra Salimoğlu
ETEsra Canan Kelten Talu
Esra Canan Kelten Talu
Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is an immunohistochemical marker that is examined in all invasive breast cancers and has prognostic and predictive value. ER-positive breast cancers refer to those that show positivity for ER at 1% cellular expression or higher. The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines suggest using the term “low ER-positive breast cancer” for tumors with ER expression between 1% and 10%. Low ER-positive breast cancers exhibit similarities, in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival rates, to triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) rather than ER-positive breast cancers. In this study, our aim was to compare the clinicopathological characteristics of low ER-positive breast cancer cases diagnosed and followed in our clinic with TNBCs. A total of 26 cases of low ER-positive breast cancer diagnosed at University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital between 2010 and 2016 were retrieved from hospital records. The relevant histopathology slides and blocks were retrieved and re-evaluated retrospectively through microscopic examination. Thirteen cases that met the criteria were included in the study. Additionally, a consecutive series of 13 TNBC cases that did not receive neoadjuvant treatment within the same time period were identified. In the low ER-positive group, the presence of tumor necrosis, as well as histological grade, nuclear grade and Ki-67 proliferation index were significantly lower compared to the TNBC group. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was significantly more common in the low ER-positive group compared to the TNBC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of tumor size, histological tumor type, axillary lymph node involvement, tumor margins, peritumoral and intratumoral inflammation, local recurrence, distant metastasis, survival, and other characteristics. Although our study consisted of a small number of cases, some features showed significant differences between low ER-positive breast cancers and TNBCs. Histological and nuclear grades, as well as the presence of a DCIS component, were associated with low ER-positive breast cancer. In contrast, the presence of tumor necrosis, as well as Grade 3 features and a high Ki-67 proliferation index indicated TNBC.

1 June 2019 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CKCem Karaali
Cem Karaali
MEMustafa Emiroğlu
Mustafa Emiroğlu
BÇBülent Çalık
Bülent Çalık
ISIsmaıl Sert
Ismaıl Sert
EKEyup Kebapci
Eyup Kebapci
CACengiz Aydın
Cengiz Aydın