Herbert M. Sauro

Prof. Dr. Herbert M. Sauro

Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5061, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2003 in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHM Hucka
M Hucka
AFA Finney
A Finney
Herbert M. SauroHerbert M. Sauro
Herbert M. Sauro
HBH Bolouri
H Bolouri
JDJ C Doyle
J C Doyle
SFSbml Forum
Sbml Forum
Motivation: Molecular biotechnology now makes it possible to build elaborate systems models, but the systems biology community needs information standards if models are to be shared, evaluated and developed cooperatively. Results: We summarize the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 1, a free, open, XML-based format for representing biochemical reaction networks. SBML is a software-independent language for describing models common to research in many areas of computational biology, including cell signaling pathways, metabolic pathways, gene regulation, and others. Availability: The specification of SBML Level 1 is freely available from http://www.sbml.org/ Contact: sysbio-team@caltech.edu * To whom correspondence should be addressed.

7 August 2009 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NNNicolas Le Novère
Nicolas Le Novère
MHMichael Hucka
Michael Hucka
HMHuaiyu Mi
Huaiyu Mi
SMStuart Moodie
Stuart Moodie
FSFalk Schreiber
Falk Schreiber
HKHiroaki Kitano
Hiroaki Kitano

6 December 2005 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NNNicolas Le Novère
Nicolas Le Novère
AFAndrew Finney
Andrew Finney
MHMichael Hucka
Michael Hucka
UBUpinder S Bhalla
Upinder S Bhalla
FCFabien Campagne
Fabien Campagne
BWBarry L Wanner
Barry L Wanner

1 August 2020 in Molecular Systems Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSarah M Keating
Sarah M Keating
DWDagmar Waltemath
Dagmar Waltemath
Matthias KönigMatthias König
Matthias König
FZFengkai Zhang
Fengkai Zhang
Andreas DrägerAndreas Dräger
Andreas Dräger
MHMichael Hucka
Michael Hucka
Systems biology has experienced dramatic growth in the number, size, and complexity of computational models. To reproduce simulation results and reuse models, researchers must exchange unambiguous model descriptions. We review the latest edition of the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML), a format designed for this purpose. A community of modelers and software authors developed SBML Level 3 over the past decade. Its modular form consists of a core suited to representing reaction‐based models and packages that extend the core with features suited to other model types including constraint‐based models, reaction‐diffusion models, logical network models, and rule‐based models. The format leverages two decades of SBML and a rich software ecosystem that transformed how systems biologists build and interact with models. More recently, the rise of multiscale models of whole cells and organs, and new data sources such as single‐cell measurements and live imaging, has precipitated new ways of integrating data with models. We provide our perspectives on the challenges presented by these developments and how SBML Level 3 provides the foundation needed to support this evolution.

6 June 2014 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMichal Galdzicki
Michal Galdzicki
KCKevin P Clancy
Kevin P Clancy
EOErnst Oberortner
Ernst Oberortner
MPMatthew Pocock
Matthew Pocock
JQJacqueline Y Quinn
Jacqueline Y Quinn
Herbert M. SauroHerbert M. Sauro
Herbert M. Sauro

15 September 2006 in PLOS Computational Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VCVijay Chickarmane
Vijay Chickarmane
CTCarl Troein
Carl Troein
UNUlrike A Nuber
Ulrike A Nuber
Herbert M. SauroHerbert M. Sauro
Herbert M. Sauro
CPCarsten Peterson
Carsten Peterson
Recent ChIP experiments of human and mouse embryonic stem cells have elucidated the architecture of the transcriptional regulatory circuitry responsible for cell determination, which involves the transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG. In addition to regulating each other through feedback loops, these genes also regulate downstream target genes involved in the maintenance and differentiation of embryonic stem cells. A search for the OCT4–SOX2–NANOG network motif in other species reveals that it is unique to mammals. With a kinetic modeling approach, we ascribe function to the observed OCT4–SOX2–NANOG network by making plausible assumptions about the interactions between the transcription factors at the gene promoter binding sites and RNA polymerase (RNAP), at each of the three genes as well as at the target genes. We identify a bistable switch in the network, which arises due to several positive feedback loops, and is switched on/off by input environmental signals. The switch stabilizes the expression levels of the three genes, and through their regulatory roles on the downstream target genes, leads to a binary decision: when OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG are expressed and the switch is on, the self-renewal genes are on and the differentiation genes are off. The opposite holds when the switch is off. The model is extremely robust to parameter changes. In addition to providing a self-consistent picture of the transcriptional circuit, the model generates several predictions. Increasing the binding strength of NANOG to OCT4 and SOX2, or increasing its basal transcriptional rate, leads to an irreversible bistable switch: the switch remains on even when the activating signal is removed. Hence, the stem cell can be manipulated to be self-renewing without the requirement of input signals. We also suggest tests that could discriminate between a variety of feedforward regulation architectures of the target genes by OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG. One key issue in developmental biology is how embryonic stem cells are regulated at the genetic level. Recent high throughput experiments have elucidated the architecture of the gene regulatory network responsible for embryonic stem cell fate decisions in human and mouse. In this work the authors develop a computational model to describe the mutual regulation of the genes involved in these networks and their subsequent effects on downstream target genes. They find that the core genetic network incorporates the functionality of a bistable switch, which arises due to positive feedback loops in the system. Also, this switch behaviour is very robust with respect to model parameters. The switch and architecture by which the genetic network regulates the downstream genes, is responsible for either maintaining the genes responsible for self-renewal on, and genes involved with differentiation off, or the opposite outcome, depending on whether the switch is on/off, respectively. The model also provides several predictions which can lead to further understanding of the network. The methods employed are fairly standard and transparent which facilitates further uncovering in future experimental investigations of genetic networks.