Giovanni Avola

Dr. Giovanni Avola

Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2009 in Scientia Horticulturae
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FGF. Gresta
F. Gresta
Giovanni AvolaGiovanni Avola
Giovanni Avola
GLG.M. Lombardo
G.M. Lombardo
LSL. Siracusa
L. Siracusa
GRG. Ruberto
G. Ruberto

1 March 2018 in Environmental and Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthew Haworth
Matthew Haworth
GMGiovanni Marino
Giovanni Marino
SCSalvatore Luciano COSENTINO
Salvatore Luciano COSENTINO
Cecilia BrunettiCecilia Brunetti
Cecilia Brunetti
ACAnna De Carlo
Anna De Carlo
MCMauro Centritto
Mauro Centritto

3 April 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giovanni AvolaGiovanni Avola
Giovanni Avola
Alessandro MateseAlessandro Matese
Alessandro Matese
Ezio RiggiEzio Riggi
Ezio Riggi
In precision agriculture systems, remote sensing has played an essential role in crop and environment monitoring, and hyperspectral imaging is a particularly effective tool in this regard

24 May 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giovanni AvolaGiovanni Avola
Giovanni Avola
Salvatore Filippo Di GennaroSalvatore Filippo Di Gennaro
Salvatore Filippo Di Gennaro
CCClaudio Cantini
Claudio Cantini
Ezio RiggiEzio Riggi
Ezio Riggi
FMFrancesco Muratore
Francesco Muratore
Alessandro MateseAlessandro Matese
Alessandro Matese
The application of spectral sensors mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) assures high spatial and temporal resolutions. This research focused on canopy reflectance for cultivar recognition in an olive grove. The ability in cultivar recognition of 14 vegetation indices (VIs) calculated from reflectance patterns (green520–600, red630–690 and near-infrared760–900 bands) and an image segmentation process was evaluated on an open-field olive grove with 10 different scion/rootstock combinations (two scions by five rootstocks). Univariate (ANOVA) and multivariate (principal components analysis—PCA and linear discriminant analysis—LDA) statistical approaches were applied. The efficacy of VIs in scion recognition emerged clearly from all the approaches applied, whereas discrimination between rootstocks appeared unclear. The results of LDA ascertained the efficacy of VI application to discriminate between scions with an accuracy of 90.9%, whereas recognition of rootstocks failed in more than 68.2% of cases.

1 September 2008 in Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giovanni AvolaGiovanni Avola
Giovanni Avola
RTR. Tuttobene
R. Tuttobene
FGF. Gresta
F. Gresta
VAV. Abbate
V. Abbate

26 April 2016 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matthew HaworthMatthew Haworth
Matthew Haworth
SCSalvatore Luciano COSENTINO
Salvatore Luciano COSENTINO
GMGiovanni Marino
Giovanni Marino
Cecilia BrunettiCecilia Brunetti
Cecilia Brunetti
DSDanilo Scordia
Danilo Scordia
MCMauro Centritto
Mauro Centritto
Genetic analyses have suggested that the clonal reproduction of Arundo donax has resulted in low genetic diversity. However, an earlier common garden phenotyping experiment identified specimens of A. donax with contrasting biomass yields (ecotypes 6 and 20). We utilized the same well‐established stands to investigate the photosynthetic and stress physiology of the A. donax ecotypes under irrigated and drought conditions. Ecotype 6 produced the largest yields in both treatments. The A. donax ecotypes exhibited identical high leaf‐level rates of photosynthesis (PN) and stomatal conductance (Gs) in the well‐watered treatment. Soil drying induced reductions in PN and Gs, decreased use of light energy for photochemistry, impaired function of photosystem II and increased heat dissipation similarly in the two ecotypes. Levels of biologically active free‐abscisic acid (ABA) and fixed glycosylated‐ABA increased earlier in response to the onset of water deficit in ecotype 6; however, as drought progressed, the ecotypes showed similar increases in both forms of ABA. This may suggest that because of the low genetic variability in A. donax the genes responding to drought might have been activated similarly in the two ecotypes, resulting in identical physiological responses to water deficit. Despite the lack of physiological ecotypic differences that could be associated with yield, A. donax retained a high degree of PN and biomass gain under water deficit stress conditions. This may enable utilization of A. donax as a fast growing biomass crop in rain‐fed marginal lands in hot drought prone climates.