Madhumita Sahoo

Dr. Madhumita Sahoo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

7 September 2014 in Natural Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAnirban Dhar
Anirban Dhar
SSSatiprasad Sahoo
Satiprasad Sahoo
SDSaumava Dey
Saumava Dey
MSMadhumita Sahoo
Madhumita Sahoo

5 June 2015 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAnirban Dhar
Anirban Dhar
SSSatiprasad Sahoo
Satiprasad Sahoo
MSMadhumita Sahoo
Madhumita Sahoo

24 November 2017 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMadhumita Sahoo
Madhumita Sahoo
AKAman Kasot
Aman Kasot
ADAnirban Dhar
Anirban Dhar
AKAmlanjyoti Kar
Amlanjyoti Kar

11 November 2016 in Hydrological Sciences Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMadhumita Sahoo
Madhumita Sahoo
TDTanmoy Das
Tanmoy Das
KKKomal Kumari
Komal Kumari
ADAnirban Dhar
Anirban Dhar
Forecasting of space–time groundwater level is important for sparsely monitored regions. Time series analysis using soft computing tools is powerful in temporal data analysis. Classical geostatistical methods provide the best estimates of spatial data. In the present work a hybrid framework for space–time groundwater level forecasting is proposed by combining a soft computing tool and a geostatistical model. Three time series forecasting models: artificial neural network, least square support vector machine and genetic programming (GP), are individually combined with the geostatistical ordinary kriging model. The experimental variogram thus obtained fits a linear combination of a nugget effect model and a power model. The efficacy of the space–time models was decided on both visual interpretation (spatial maps) and calculated error statistics. It was found that the GP–kriging space–time model gave the most satisfactory results in terms of average absolute relative error, root mean square error, normalized mean bias error and normalized root mean square error.

7 August 2023 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAlireza Moghaddam Nia
Alireza Moghaddam Nia
Debasmita MisraDebasmita Misra
Debasmita Misra
MKMahsa H. Kashani
Mahsa H. Kashani
MGMohsen Ghafari
Mohsen Ghafari
MSMadhumita Sahoo
Madhumita Sahoo
MJMaryam Sadat Jaafarzadeh
Maryam Sadat Jaafarzadeh
Tropical Indian river basins are well-known for high and low discharges with high peaks of flood during the summer and the rest of the year, respectively. A high intensity of rainfall due to cyclonic and monsoon winds have caused the tropical Indian rivers to witness more runoff. These rivers are also known for carrying a significant amount of sediment load. The complex and non-linear nature of the sediment yield and runoff processes and the variability of these processes depend on precipitation patterns and river basin characteristics. There are a number of other elements that make it difficult to forecast with great precision. The present study attempts to model rainfall–runoff–sediment yield with the help of five machine learning (ML) algorithms—support vector regression (SVR), artificial neural network (ANN) with Elman network, artificial neural network with multilayer perceptron network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and local linear regression, which are useful in river basins with scarce hydrological data. Daily, weekly, and monthly runoff and sediment yield (SY) time series of Vamsadhara river basin, India for a period from 1 June to 31 October for the years 1984 to 1995 were simulated using models based on these multiple machine learning algorithms. Simulated results were tested and compared by means of three evaluation criteria, namely Pearson correlation coefficient, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, and the difference of slope. The results suggested that daily and weekly predictions of runoff based on all the models can be successfully employed together with precipitation observations to predict future sediment yield in the study basin. The models prepared in the present study can be helpful in providing essential insight to the erosion–deposition dynamics of the river basin.