Despite adequate glycemic and blood pressure control, diabetic hypertensives remain at increased cardiovascular risk. Aortic stiffness and pulse pressure (PP) amplification may provide complementary information to correct cardiovascular risk. We aim to determine whether these hemodynamic parameters are interrelated or not and to explore the factors related to pressure pulsatility.A cross-sectional study was conducted in 351 patients, involving controls, hypertensives without diabetes and diabetic patients with or without hypertension. Hemodynamic parameters were determined by applanation tonometry. Multivariate regression analyses evaluated the interest of therapeutic strategies.Aortic stiffness and PP amplification were not interrelated (P = 0.32) in multivariate-adjusted analysis and were both independently associated with previous cardiovascular events. Although disproportionately increased aortic stiffness in diabetic hypertensives (P < 0.001), no difference was found for PP amplification. The present dissociation between these two hemodynamic parameters may be related to the effect of increased heart rate (P < 0.001) in the presence of diabetes, in men and women. In diabetic hypertensives, aortic stiffness was correlated with glycated hemoglobin level (P = 0.04), but not with blood pressure or heart rate. Antihypertensive and statin treatments were correlated with PP amplification but not with aortic stiffness.Aortic stiffness and PP amplification were not interrelated, suggesting that these markers may provide complementary information for cardiovascular risk. New therapeutic strategies targeting pressure pulsatility should take into account the impact of hyperglycemia and increased heart rate in diabetic hypertensives. Gender influence on the role of autonomic nervous system in attenuating pressure wave reflections remains to be further established.

Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health threat worldwide. Some authors have suggested that end-users of nursing homes have an influence on antibiotic prescribing. The objective of this study is to describe the views of end-users and professionals on residents’ behavior towards antibiotic therapy in terms of knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes towards this drug class and its prescribing process. This is a concurrent mixed methodology study using questionnaires and semi-directive individual interviews with nursing homes residents, nurses, and doctors practicing in these facilities. The questionnaires analyzed were collected from 35 residents (24.3%) and 109 nurses (75.7%). The qualitative interview involved 26 of total participants that agreed to be interviewed. We noticed misconceptions being held by the residents regarding the antibiotic resistance phenomenon. Additionally, nurses were not considered as a source of information about antibiotics. Nurses and residents had conflicting opinions about residents requesting antibiotics, and the findings depict a stereotypical view of the nurse profession as a reflection of a cognitive representation. The authors conclude that, despite many campaigns, further efforts are needed to tackle antimicrobial resistance. Initiatives could include raising awareness about antimicrobial resistance, clarifying the role of nurses, and communicating well with residents about their needs in nursing homes.

Elderly residents in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) constitute a population noted to have a large number of medications prescribed and administered. The aim of this article is to explore the nursing role for medication management, with an emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship, guided by disciplinary knowledge of King’s theory of goal attainment and skill-based medication knowledge. The outcome is a nursing workforce truly engaged in working with interdisciplinary colleagues and focusing on care planning that includes medication management to improve the health status of residents in long-term care facilities.

Public involvement (PI) is of great interest. However, little is known about this topic in the design, development, and/or implementation of health interventions in geriatric facilities. This study aimed to provide a critical overview of the involvement of caregivers and end-users in interventions in these facilities, based on Rifkin’s analytical framework. This systematic review, supplemented by a questionnaire to the corresponding authors, covered non-drug intervention reports targeting nurses, doctors, residents, and their relatives. Articles were published in Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, and Cinahl, from January 2016 to April 2018. Ninety-seven articles were included. The review shows a low level or partial PI in geriatric facilities where it exists. These results are further supported by the authors’ responses to the questionnaire. PI remains uncommon in geriatric institutions and consists of a consumerist model, suggesting the need for improved practices. More efforts are needed to experiment with recommendations to meet the challenges of PI and enhance the public ownership of interventions. The protocol was registered on Prospero under the number CRD42018098504.

Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in elderly living in nursing homes, and antibiotics prescription for this infection is particularly challenging. In these facilities, due to the absence of on-site physicians, nurses play an essential role when an infection is suspected, as they are the ones who collect and communicate by phone all the information needed by the physician for the decision-making process. In that context, our study aims to reduce antibiotic consumption in nursing homes, using a multimodal intervention, by strengthening nurses’ involvement during the process of prescription for UTI. Methods/design: This is a planned 2-arm cluster randomized study of 40 nursing homes randomly assigned either to the control group or to the intervention group, using a 1:1 ratio. The intervention consists of reinforcing the nurses’ knowledge concerning antibiotics and UTI; assist their clinical judgment using a decision aid diagram; improving their communication skills with the residents, their relatives, and the prescribers; and also increasing their involvement in the intervention’ process by organizing a competition opposing the nursing homes of the interventional group to select additional intervention tools. Analysis: The main outcome is the reduction of the relative frequency of antibiotics prescription for UTIs in the interventional group. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the French Committee for the Protection of Persons (N. 19.01.04/SI CNRIPH 18.12.07.48123). An article including the main outcome will be submitted to a peer review journal.