Mariana Mayer Pinto

Dr. Mariana Mayer Pinto

University of New South Wales (UNSW) Australia, Sydney, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2017 in Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMelanie J. Bishop
Melanie J. Bishop
MPMariana Mayer Pinto
Mariana Mayer Pinto
LALaura Airoldi
Laura Airoldi
LFLouise B. Firth
Louise B. Firth
RMRebecca Morris
Rebecca Morris
KDKatherine Dafforn
Katherine Dafforn
© 2017 The Authors The growing number of artificial structures in estuarine, coastal and marine environments is causing “ocean sprawl”. Artificial structures do not only modify marine and coastal ecosystems at the sites of their placement, but may also produce larger-scale impacts through their alteration of ecological connectivity - the movement of organisms, materials and energy between habitat units within seascapes. Despite the growing awareness of the capacity of ocean sprawl to influence ecological connectivity, we lack a comprehensive understanding of how artificial structures modify ecological connectivity in near- and off-shore environments, and when and where their effects on connectivity are greatest. We review the mechanisms by which ocean sprawl may modify ecological connectivity, including trophic connectivity associated with the flow of nutrients and resources. We also review demonstrated, inferred and likely ecological impacts of such changes to connectivity, at scales from genes to ecosystems, and potential strategies of management for mitigating these effects. Ocean sprawl may alter connectivity by: (1) creating barriers to the movement of some organisms and resources - by adding physical barriers or by modifying and fragmenting habitats; (2) introducing new structural material that acts as a conduit for the movement of other organisms or resources across the landscape; and (3) altering trophic connectivity. Changes to connectivity may, in turn, influence the genetic structure and size of populations, the distribution of species, and community structure and ecological functioning. Two main approaches to the assessment of ecological connectivity have been taken: (1) measurement of structural connectivity - the configuration of the landscape and habitat patches and their dynamics; and (2) measurement of functional connectivity - the response of organisms or particles to the landscape. Our review reveals the paucity of studies directly addressing the effects of artificial structures on ecological connectivity in the marine environment, particularly at large spatial and temporal scales. With the ongoing development of estuarine and marine environments, there is a pressing need for additional studies that quantify the effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity. Understanding the mechanisms by which structures modify connectivity is essential if marine spatial planning and eco-engineering are to be effectively utilised to minimise impacts

8 January 2015 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KDKatherine Dafforn
Katherine Dafforn
GTGlasby Tim
Glasby Tim
LALaura Airoldi
Laura Airoldi
NRNatalie K Rivero
Natalie K Rivero
MPMariana Mayer Pinto
Mariana Mayer Pinto
EJEmma L Johnston
Emma L Johnston

31 August 2020 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABA. B. Bugnot
A. B. Bugnot
MPMariana Mayer Pinto
Mariana Mayer Pinto
LALaura Airoldi
Laura Airoldi
EHE. C. Heery
E. C. Heery
EJE. L. Johnston
E. L. Johnston
KDKatherine Dafforn
Katherine Dafforn

19 June 2017 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEma Strain
Ema Strain
COCelia Olabarria
Celia Olabarria
MPMariana Mayer Pinto
Mariana Mayer Pinto
VCV Cumbo
V Cumbo
RMRl Morris
Rl Morris
MBMj Bishop
Mj Bishop

1 July 2017 in Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EHEliza C. Heery
Eliza C. Heery
MBMelanie J. Bishop
Melanie J. Bishop
LCLincoln P. Critchley
Lincoln P. Critchley
ABAna B. Bugnot
Ana B. Bugnot
LALaura Airoldi
Laura Airoldi
KDKatherine Dafforn
Katherine Dafforn
© 2017 The Authors Extensive development and construction in marine and coastal systems is driving a phenomenon known as “ocean sprawl”. Ocean sprawl removes or transforms marine habitats through the addition of artificial structures and some of the most significant impacts are occurring in sedimentary environments. Marine sediments have substantial social, ecological, and economic value, as they are rich in biodiversity, crucial to fisheries productivity, and major sites of nutrient transformation. Yet the impact of ocean sprawl on sedimentary environments has largely been ignored. Here we review current knowledge of the impacts to sedimentary ecosystems arising from artificial structures. Artificial structures alter the composition and abundance of a wide variety of sediment-dependent taxa, including microbes, invertebrates, and benthic-feeding fishes. The effects vary by structure design and configuration, as well as the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the environment in which structures are placed. The mechanisms driving effects from artificial structures include placement loss, habitat degradation, modification of sound and light conditions, hydrodynamic changes, organic enrichment and material fluxes, contamination, and altered biotic interactions. Most studies have inferred mechanism based on descriptive work, comparing biological and physical processes at various distances from structures. Further experimental studies are needed to identify the relative importance of multiple mechanisms and to demonstrate causal relationships. Additionally, past studies have focused on impacts at a relatively small scale, and independently of other development that is occurring. There is need to quantify large-scale and cumulative effects on sedimentary ecosystems as artificial structures proliferate. We highlight the importance for comprehensive monitoring using robust survey designs and outline research strategies needed to understand, value, and protect marine sedimentary ecosystems in the face of a rapidly changing environment

20 February 2019 in Functional Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAdriana Vergés
Adriana Vergés
EMErin McCosker
Erin McCosker
MPMariana Mayer Pinto
Mariana Mayer Pinto
MCMelinda A. Coleman
Melinda A. Coleman
TWThomas Wernberg
Thomas Wernberg
PSPeter D. Steinberg
Peter D. Steinberg
Temperate reefs from around the world are becoming tropicalised, as warm‐water species shift their distribution towards the poles in response to warming. This is already causing profound shifts in dominant foundation species and associated ecological communities as canopy seaweeds such as kelp are replaced by tropical species. Here, we argue that the cascading consequences of tropicalisation for the ecosystem properties and functions of warming temperate reefs depend largely on the taxa that end up dominating the seafloor. We put forward three potential tropicalisation trajectories, that differ in whether seaweeds, turf or corals become dominant. We highlight potential gains to certain ecosystem functions for some tropicalisation endpoints. For example, local benthic fish productivity may increase in some tropicalised reefs as a higher proportion of primary production is directly consumed, but this will be at the expense of other functions such as carbon export. We argue that understanding these changes in flows of energy and materials is essential to formulate new conservation strategies and management approaches that minimise risks as well as capture potential opportunities. Regardless of which trajectory is followed, tropicalised systems represent largely novel ecosystem configurations. This poses major challenges to traditional conservation and environmental management approaches, which typically focus on maintaining or returning species to particular locations. We outline management practices that may either mitigate predicted structural and functional changes or make the most of potential new opportunities in tropicalised reefs. These include marine protected areas to increase resilience and connectivity, the development of new fisheries that target range‐expanding invaders, and assisted evolution and migration strategies to facilitate the dominance of large habitat formers like corals or seaweeds. We highlight important ecological and ethical challenges associated with developing novel approaches to manage tropicalised reefs, which may need to become increasingly interventionist. As technological innovations continue to emerge, having clear goals and considering the ethics surrounding interventions among the broader community are essential steps to successfully develop novel management approaches. A plain language summary is available for this article.