Building footprint extraction from remotely sensed imagery is a critical task in the field of illegal building discovery, urban dynamic monitoring, and disaster emergency response. Recent research has made significant progress in this area by utilizing deep learning techniques. However, it remains difficult to efficiently balance the spatial detail and rich semantic features. In particular, the extracted building edge is often inaccurate, especially in areas where the buildings are densely distributed, and the boundary of adjacent building instances is difficult to distinguish accurately. Additionally, identifying buildings with varying scales remains a challenging problem. To address the above problems, we designed a novel framework that aggregated multilevel contextual information extracted from multiple encoders. Furthermore, we introduced an instance constraint into contrastive learning to enhance the robustness of the feature representation. Experimental results demonstrated that our proposed method achieved 91.07% and 74.58% on the intersection over union metric on the WHU and Massachusetts datasets, respectively, outperforming the most recent related methods. Notably, our method significantly improved the accuracy of building boundaries, especially at the building instance level, and the integrity of multi-scale buildings.
The age of a shelterbelt is not only an important parameter for determining the function of a shelterbelt, it is also strongly related to the biomass and carbon flux of shelterbelt ecosystems. Therefore, timely and accurate identifications of shelterbelt ages are key for shelterbelt monitoring and management. This study developed a method for estimating shelterbelt age (i.e., years after planting) from a time series of remote sensing images. Firstly, the shelterbelts were divided into three states based on a single remote sensing image of each. Then, a three-stage growth process was established by analysis. Finally, the shelterbelt ages were determined based on time series remote sensing images over a two-year monitoring period in the study area. The actual shelterbelt ages based on field measurements were used to analyze the accuracy of the results. The total number of samples was 243. The results showed that the age identification accuracy was 68.7%. The main factors affecting the identification accuracy were missing images, cloud cover, and the length of the monitoring period. Despite some uncertainties, the proposed method may be used to obtain critical data for shelterbelt management and conducting quick surveys of current shelterbelt conditions over a large area.