Living organisms are surrounded with heavy metals such as methylmercury, manganese, cobalt, cadmium, arsenic, as well as pesticides such as deltamethrin and paraquat, or atmospheric pollutants such as quinone. Extensive studies have demonstrated a strong link between environmental pollutants and human health. Redox toxicity is proposed as one of the main mechanisms of chemical-induced pathology in humans. Acting as both a sensor of oxidative stress and a positive regulator of antioxidants, the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) has attracted recent attention. However, the role NRF2 plays in environmental pollutant-induced toxicity has not been systematically addressed. Here, we characterize NRF2 function in response to various pollutants, such as metals, pesticides and atmospheric quinones. NRF2 related signaling pathways and epigenetic regulations are also reviewed.

Previous studies have demonstrated that exposure to nickel nanoparticles (Nano-Ni) causes oxidative stress and severe, persistent lung inflammation, which are strongly associated with pulmonary toxicity. However, few studies have investigated whether surface modification of Nano-Ni could alter Nano-Ni-induced lung injury, inflammation, and fibrosis in vivo. Here, we propose that alteration of physicochemical properties of Nano-Ni through modification of Nano-Ni surface may change Nano-Ni-induced lung injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. At first, dose–response and time-response studies were performed to observe lung inflammation and injury caused by Nano-Ni. In the dose–response studies, mice were intratracheally instilled with 0, 10, 20, 50, and 100 μg per mouse of Nano-Ni and sacrificed at day 3 post-exposure. In the time-response studies, mice were intratracheally instilled with 50 µg per mouse of Nano-Ni and sacrificed at days 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 42 post-instillation. At the end of the experiment, mice were bronchoalveolar lavaged (BAL) and the neutrophil count, CXCL1/KC level, LDH activity, and concentration of total protein in the BAL fluid (BALF) were determined. In the comparative studies, mice were intratracheally instilled with 50 μg per mouse of Nano-Ni or with the same molar concentration of Ni as Nano-Ni of either partially [O]-passivated Nano-Ni (Nano-Ni–P) or carbon-coated Nano-Ni (Nano-Ni–C). At day 3 post-exposure, BAL was performed and the above cellular and biochemical parameters in the BALF were analyzed. The MMP-2/9 protein levels and activities in the BALF and mouse lung tissues were also determined. Mouse lung tissues were also collected for H&E staining, and measurement of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in the genomic DNA. At day 42 post-exposure, mouse right lung tissues were collected for H&E and Trichrome stainings, and left lung tissues were collected to determine the hydroxyproline content. Exposure of mice to Nano-Ni resulted in a dose–response increase in acute lung inflammation and injury reflected by increased neutrophil count, CXCL1/KC level, LDH activity, and concentration of total protein in the BALF. The time-response study showed that Nano-Ni-induced acute lung inflammation and injury appeared as early as day 1, peaked at day 3, and attenuated at day 7 post-instillation. Although the neutrophil count, CXCL1/KC level, LDH activity, and concentration of total protein in the BALF dramatically decreased over the time, their levels were still higher than those of the controls even at day 42 post-exposure. Based on the results of the dose- and time-response studies, we chose a dose of 50 µg per mouse of Nano-Ni, and day 3 post-exposure as short-term and day 42 post-exposure as long-term to compare the effects of Nano-Ni, Nano-Ni–P, and Nano-Ni–C on mouse lungs. At day 3 post-exposure, 50 μg per mouse of Nano-Ni caused acute lung inflammation and injury that were reflected by increased neutrophil count, CXCL1/KC level, LDH activity, concentration of total protein, and MMP-2/9 protein levels and activities in the BALF. Nano-Ni exposure also caused increased MMP-2/9 activities in the mouse lung tissues. Histologically, infiltration of large numbers of neutrophils and macrophages in the alveolar space and interstitial tissues was observed in mouse lungs exposed to Nano-Ni. Nano-Ni–P exposure caused similar acute lung inflammation and injury as Nano-Ni. However, exposure to Nano-Ni–C only caused mild acute lung inflammation and injury. At day 42 post-exposure, Nano-Ni caused extensive interstitial fibrosis and proliferation of interstitial cells with inflammatory cells infiltrating the alveolar septa and alveolar space. Lung fibrosis was also observed in Nano-Ni–P-exposed lungs, but to a much lesser degree. Only slight or no lung fibrosis was observed in Nano-Ni–C-exposed lungs. Nano-Ni and Nano-Ni–P, but not Nano-Ni–C, caused significantly elevated levels of TBARS in mouse lung tissues and 8-OHdG in mouse lung tissue genomic DNA, suggesting that Nano-Ni and Nano-Ni–P induce lipid peroxidation and oxidative DNA damage in mouse lung tissues, while Nano-Ni–C does not. Our results demonstrate that short-term Nano-Ni exposure causes acute lung inflammation and injury, while long-term Nano-Ni exposure causes chronic lung inflammation and fibrosis. Surface modification of Nano-Ni alleviates Nano-Ni-induced pulmonary effects; partially passivated Nano-Ni causes similar effects as Nano-Ni, but the chronic inflammation and fibrosis were at a much lesser degree. Carbon coating significantly alleviates Nano-Ni-induced acute and chronic lung inflammation and injury.

Background: As the demand and application of engineered nanomaterials have increased, their potential toxicity to the central nervous system has drawn increasing attention. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are novel cell–cell communication that plays a crucial role in pathology and physiology. However, the relationship between TNTs and nanomaterials neurotoxicity remains unclear. Here, three types of commonly used engineered nanomaterials, namely cobalt nanoparticles (CoNPs), titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂NPs), and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), were selected to address this limitation. Results: After the complete characterization of the nanomaterials, the induction of TNTs formation with all of the nanomaterials was observed using high-content screening system and confocal microscopy in both primary astrocytes and U251 cells. It was further revealed that TNT formation protected against nanomaterial-induced neurotoxicity due to cell apoptosis and disrupted ATP production. We then determined the mechanism underlying the protective role of TNTs. Since oxidative stress is a common mechanism in nanotoxicity, we first observed a significant increase in total and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (namely ROS, mtROS), causing mitochondrial damage. Moreover, pretreatment of U251 cells with either the ROS scavenger N-acetylcysteine or the mtROS scavenger mitoquinone attenuated nanomaterial-induced neurotoxicity and TNTs generation, suggesting a central role of ROS in nanomaterials-induced TNTs formation. Furthermore, a vigorous downstream pathway of ROS, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, was found to be actively involved in nanomaterials-promoted TNTs development, which was abolished by LY294002, Perifosine and Rapamycin, inhibitors of PI3K, AKT, and mTOR, respectively. Finally, western blot analysis demonstrated that ROS and mtROS scavengers suppressed the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, which abrogated TNTs formation. Conclusion: Despite their biophysical properties, various types of nanomaterials promote TNTs formation and mitochondrial transfer, preventing cell apoptosis and disrupting ATP production induced by nanomaterials. ROS/mtROS and the activation of the downstream PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are common mechanisms to regulate TNTs formation and mitochondrial transfer. Our study reveals that engineered nanomaterials share the same molecular mechanism of TNTs formation and intercellular mitochondrial transfer, and the proposed adverse outcome pathway contributes to a better understanding of the intercellular protection mechanism against nanomaterials-induced neurotoxicity. Graphical