Francesca Antonacci

Dr. Francesca Antonacci

Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2008 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJeff Kidd
Jeff Kidd
GCGregory M. Cooper
Gregory M. Cooper
WDWilliam F. Donahue
William F. Donahue
HHHillary S. Hayden
Hillary S. Hayden
NSNick Sampas
Nick Sampas
FMF. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
F. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa

10 November 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMark J. P. Chaisson
Mark J. P. Chaisson
JHJohn Huddleston
John Huddleston
MDMegan Y. Dennis
Megan Y. Dennis
PSPeter H. Sudmant
Peter H. Sudmant
MMMaika Malig
Maika Malig
FMF. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
F. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa

30 August 2009 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CACan Alkan
Can Alkan
JKJeff Kidd
Jeff Kidd
TMTomas Marques
Tomas Marques
GAGozde Aksay
Gozde Aksay
Francesca AntonacciFrancesca Antonacci
Francesca Antonacci
FMF. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
F. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
Evan Eichler and colleagues have developed an algorithm called mrFAST to map short, next-generation sequence reads across the genome that allows for the accurate prediction of copy-number variation. Despite their importance in gene innovation and phenotypic variation, duplicated regions have remained largely intractable owing to difficulties in accurately resolving their structure, copy number and sequence content. We present an algorithm (mrFAST) to comprehensively map next-generation sequence reads, which allows for the prediction of absolute copy-number variation of duplicated segments and genes. We examine three human genomes and experimentally validate genome-wide copy number differences. We estimate that, on average, 73–87 genes vary in copy number between any two individuals and find that these genic differences overwhelmingly correspond to segmental duplications (odds ratio = 135; P < 2.2 × 10−16). Our method can distinguish between different copies of highly identical genes, providing a more accurate assessment of gene content and insight into functional constraint without the limitations of array-based technology.

29 October 2010 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPeter H. Sudmant
Peter H. Sudmant
JKJacob O. Kitzman
Jacob O. Kitzman
Francesca AntonacciFrancesca Antonacci
Francesca Antonacci
CACan Alkan
Can Alkan
MMMaika Malig
Maika Malig
FMF. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
F. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
Evolution, Gene Number, and Disease: Slight variations in the numbers of copies of genes influence human disease and other characters. Variants can be hard to detect when they lie in heavily duplicated and widely similar regions of sequence known as “dark matter.” Sudmant et al. (p. 641 ) have methods to tease apart the duplicated regions to reveal singly unique nucleotide identifiers. These have turned out to be among the most variable seen in different human population groups—most notably among genes for neurodevelopment and neurological diseases. Such polymorphisms can be genotyped with specificity and may help us understand how variation in copy number may affect human evolution and disease.

14 February 2010 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSanthosh Girirajan
Santhosh Girirajan
JRJill A Rosenfeld
Jill A Rosenfeld
GCGregory M Cooper
Gregory M Cooper
Francesca AntonacciFrancesca Antonacci
Francesca Antonacci
PSPriscillia Siswara
Priscillia Siswara
FMF. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
F. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
Evan Eichler and colleagues identify a recurrent microdeletion on 16p12.1 associated with developmental, cognitive and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. They also show that more severe phenotypes are frequently correlated with the presence of a second large genomic rearrangement, supporting a complex model of pathogenesis that may underlie the variable expressivity typical of many microdeletion syndromes. We report the identification of a recurrent, 520-kb 16p12.1 microdeletion associated with childhood developmental delay. The microdeletion was detected in 20 of 11,873 cases compared with 2 of 8,540 controls (P = 0.0009, OR = 7.2) and replicated in a second series of 22 of 9,254 cases compared with 6 of 6,299 controls (P = 0.028, OR = 2.5). Most deletions were inherited, with carrier parents likely to manifest neuropsychiatric phenotypes compared to non-carrier parents (P = 0.037, OR = 6). Probands were more likely to carry an additional large copy-number variant when compared to matched controls (10 of 42 cases, P = 5.7 × 10−5, OR = 6.6). The clinical features of individuals with two mutations were distinct from and/or more severe than those of individuals carrying only the co-occurring mutation. Our data support a two-hit model in which the 16p12.1 microdeletion both predisposes to neuropsychiatric phenotypes as a single event and exacerbates neurodevelopmental phenotypes in association with other large deletions or duplications. Analysis of other microdeletions with variable expressivity indicates that this two-hit model might be more generally applicable to neuropsychiatric disease.

1 May 2012 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMegan Y. Dennis
Megan Y. Dennis
XNXander Nuttle
Xander Nuttle
PSPeter H. Sudmant
Peter H. Sudmant
Francesca AntonacciFrancesca Antonacci
Francesca Antonacci
TGTina A. Graves
Tina A. Graves
FMF. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa
F. Kumara Eugene Mastrorosa