Muhammad Jalees

Dr. Muhammad Jalees

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Environment, Development and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MJMuhammad Jalees
Muhammad Jalees
UFUmar Farooq
Umar Farooq
MAMehwish Anis
Mehwish Anis
GHGhulam Hussain
Ghulam Hussain
AIArfa Iqbal
Arfa Iqbal
SSSana Saleem
Sana Saleem

1 April 2011 in Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTahira Fazeelat
Tahira Fazeelat
MAMuhammad Asif
Muhammad Asif
MJMuhammad Jalees
Muhammad Jalees
ASAbdus Saleem
Abdus Saleem
ANArif Nazir
Arif Nazir
SNShahid Nadeem
Shahid Nadeem

9 March 2019 in Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MJMuhammad Jalees
Muhammad Jalees
MFMuhammad Umar Farooq
Muhammad Umar Farooq
SBSarosh Basheer
Sarosh Basheer
SASadia Asghar
Sadia Asghar

1 October 2014 in Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMuhammad Asif
Muhammad Asif
TFTahira Fazeelat
Tahira Fazeelat
MJMuhammad Jalees
Muhammad Jalees

23 June 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UFUmar Farooq
Umar Farooq
AZAbdul Mannan Zafar
Abdul Mannan Zafar
WRWarda Raheem
Warda Raheem
MJMuhammad Jalees
Muhammad Jalees
Ashraf Aly HassanAshraf Aly Hassan
Ashraf Aly Hassan
Estimating groundwater quality parameters through conventional methods is time-consuming through laboratory measurements for megacities. There is a need to develop models that can help decision-makers make policies for sustainable groundwater reserves. The current study compared the efficiency of multivariate linear regressions (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models in the prediction of groundwater parameters for total dissolved solids (TDS) for three sub-divisions in Lahore, Pakistan. The data for this study were collected every quarter of a year for six years. ANN was applied to investigate the feasibility of feedforward, backpropagation neural networks with three training functions T-BR (Bayesian regularization backpropagation), T-LM (Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation), and T-SCG (scaled conjugate backpropagation). Two activation functions were used to analyze the performance of algorithmic training functions, i.e., Logsig and Tanh. Input parameters of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), chloride (Cl−), and sulfate (SO42−) was used to predict TDS as an output parameter. The computed values of TDS by ANN and MLR were in close agreement with their respective measured values. Comparative analysis of ANN and MLR showed that TDS root means square error (RMSE) for city sub-division and Pearson’s coefficient of correlation (r) for ANN and MLR were 2.9% and 0.981 and 4.5% and 0.978, respectively. Similarly, for the Farrukhabad sub-division, RMSE and r for ANN were 4.9% and 0.952, while RMSE and r for MLR were 5.5% and 0.941, respectively. For the Shahadra sub-division, RMSE was 10.8%, r was 0.869 for ANN, RMSE was 11.3%, and r was 0.860 for MLR. The results exhibited that the ANN model showed less error in results than MLR. Therefore, ANN can be employed successfully as a groundwater quality prediction tool for TDS assessment.

5 May 2016 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MJMuhammad Jalees
Muhammad Jalees
ZAZukhruf Asim
Zukhruf Asim