Anthony Bonavia

Dr. Anthony Bonavia

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJames Francescangeli
James Francescangeli
KKKunal Karamchandani
Kunal Karamchandani
MPMeghan Powell
Meghan Powell
ABAnthony Bonavia
Anthony Bonavia
The serotonin syndrome is a medication-induced condition resulting from serotonergic hyperactivity, usually involving antidepressant medications. As the number of patients experiencing medically-treated major depressive disorder increases, so does the population at risk for experiencing serotonin syndrome. Excessive synaptic stimulation of 5-HT2A receptors results in autonomic and neuromuscular aberrations with potentially life-threatening consequences. In this review, we will outline the molecular basis of the disease and describe how pharmacologic agents that are in common clinical use can interfere with normal serotonergic pathways to result in a potentially fatal outcome. Given that serotonin syndrome can imitate other clinical conditions, an understanding of the molecular context of this condition is essential for its detection and in order to prevent rapid clinical deterioration.

11 August 2017 in Pediatric Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAnthony Bonavia
Anthony Bonavia
KSKai Singbartl
Kai Singbartl

3 September 2018 in Blood Purification
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAnthony Bonavia
Anthony Bonavia
AGAndrew Groff
Andrew Groff
KKKunal Karamchandani
Kunal Karamchandani
KSKai Singbartl
Kai Singbartl
Cytokines play a critical role in coordinating and amplifying a host immune response to infection. The normal pattern of localized and systemic release of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines varies on the basis of the disease process. A dysregulated cytokine response can lead to a hyper-inflammatory condition called a cytokine storm. This is believed to contribute to the pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock, a condition carrying high morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption is an emerging technology utilized in the treatment of dysregulated inflammatory states such as sepsis, although there is a paucity of clinical evidence supporting its outcomes benefits. We assess the peer-reviewed literature relating to cytokine hemoadsorption in the context of sepsis and suggest areas of future research incorporating this novel technology.

1 December 2015 in Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKarthik Raghunathan
Karthik Raghunathan
ABAnthony Bonavia
Anthony Bonavia
BNBrian H. Nathanson
Brian H. Nathanson
CBChristopher A. Beadles
Christopher A. Beadles
ASAndrew D. Shaw
Andrew D. Shaw
PLPeter K. Lindenauer
Peter K. Lindenauer
In this retrospective cohort study including 60,734 adults with septic shock (admitted across 360 intensive care units in the United States), crystalloid choice during resuscitation impacts outcomes. When compared with isotonic saline used exclusively, the administration of balanced crystalloids during initial resuscitation is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and no difference in length of stay or costs per day. When colloids are coadministered, length of stay and costs per day increase without improving survival, independent of crystalloid choice. Background: Currently, guidelines recommend initial resuscitation with intravenous (IV) crystalloids during severe sepsis/septic shock. Albumin is suggested as an alternative. However, fluid mixtures are often used in practice, and it is unclear whether the specific mixture of IV fluids used impacts outcomes. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the specific mixture of IV fluids used during initial resuscitation, in severe sepsis, is associated with important in-hospital outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study includes patients with severe sepsis who were resuscitated with at least 2 l of crystalloids and vasopressors by hospital day 2, patients who had not undergone any major surgical procedures, and patients who had a hospital length of stay (LOS) of at least 2 days. Inverse probability weighting, propensity score matching, and hierarchical regression methods were used for risk adjustment. Patients were grouped into four exposure categories: recipients of isotonic saline alone (“Sal” exclusively), saline in combination with balanced crystalloids (“Sal + Bal”), saline in combination with colloids (“Sal + Col”), or saline in combination with balanced crystalloids and colloids (“Sal + Bal + Col”). In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome, and hospital LOS and costs per day (among survivors) were secondary outcomes. Results: In risk-adjusted Inverse Probability Weighting analyses including 60,734 adults admitted to 360 intensive care units across the United States between January 2006 and December 2010, in-hospital mortality was intermediate in the Sal group (20.2%), lower in the Sal + Bal group (17.7%, P < 0.001), higher in the Sal + Col group (24.2%, P < 0.001), and similar in the Sal + Bal + Col group (19.2%, P = 0.401). In pairwise propensity score–matched comparisons, the administration of balanced crystalloids by hospital day 2 was consistently associated with lower mortality, whether colloids were used (relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.92) or not (relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.89). The association between colloid use and in-hospital mortality was inconsistent, and survival was not uniformly affected, whereas LOS and costs per day were uniformly increased. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: During the initial resuscitation of adults with severe sepsis/septic shock, the types of IV fluids used may impact in-hospital mortality. When compared with the administration of isotonic saline exclusively during resuscitation, the coadministration of balanced crystalloids is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and no difference in LOS or costs per day. When colloids are coadministered, LOS and costs per day are increased without improved survival. A large randomized controlled trial evaluating crystalloid choice is warranted. Meanwhile, the use of balanced crystalloids seems reasonable. (Anesthesiology 2015; 123:1385-93)

20 November 2008 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
USUmut Sarpel
Umut Sarpel
ABAnthony Bonavia
Anthony Bonavia
AGAlexis Grucela
Alexis Grucela
SRSasan Roayaie
Sasan Roayaie
MSMyron E. Schwartz
Myron E. Schwartz
DLDaniel M. Labow
Daniel M. Labow

2 April 2019 in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKunal Karamchandani
Kunal Karamchandani
JKJohn C. Klick
John C. Klick
MDMelissa Linskey Dougherty
Melissa Linskey Dougherty
ABAnthony Bonavia
Anthony Bonavia
SASteven R. Allen
Steven R. Allen
ZCZyad J. Carr
Zyad J. Carr
Acute and chronic pain in trauma patients remains a challenging entity, particularly in the setting of the escalating opioid epidemic. It has been reported that chronic opioid use increases the likelihood of hospital admissions as a result of traumatic injuries. Furthermore, patients admitted with traumatic injuries have a greater than average risk of developing opioid use disorder after discharge. Practitioners providing care to these patients will encounter the issue of balancing analgesic goals and acute opioid withdrawal with the challenge of reducing postdischarge persistent opioid use. Additionally, the practitioner is faced with the worrisome prospect that inadequate treatment of acute pain may lead to the development of chronic pain and overtreatment may result in opioid dependence. It is therefore imperative to understand and execute alternative nonopioid strategies to maximize the benefits and reduce the risks of analgesic regimens in this patient population. This narrative review will analyze the current literature on pain management in trauma patients and highlight the application of the multimodal approach in potentially reducing the risks of both short- and long-term opioid use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Narrative review, moderate to High.